|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
BluegrassDem
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:33 PM Original message |
The Des Moines Register editorial board is composed of mostly women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:35 PM Original message |
Those dumb broads are ruining journalism! (Spinsters, every one of 'em) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowbear
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
30. Kurt and Hunter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. I believe that the use of the antique terms "broad" and "spinster" is sufficient indication of jest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Think82
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
93. not necessarily on this board : ) a lot of people don't share our Bidenite sense of humor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Those girls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Next thing you know they'll think they control a majority of the nation's votes n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. uppity broads..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
32. HeeHee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. I thought there were 7 members and 6 out of 7 were women? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. 6 members. One man. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Now that is sexist n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BluegrassDem
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Women vote for women in higher numbers...what's sexist about that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Then why aren't there more women in office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:54 AM Response to Reply #27 |
83. because many men won't vote for a woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
56. Yes, but they're not the biggest supporters of women. Women don't vote as a bloc that way. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
69. It's insulting to say that women will vote for Hillary just because she's a woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:09 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. absolutely correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #69 |
84. I beg to differ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
5. I read it was 6 women, one man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. 5 women, one man nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. No comment. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. 6 members. Rox Laird is the only man. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. damn upitty women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. They must not have husbands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Taking jobs from men who really need them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. and sending their kids to child care (if they even bother to have any) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
60. The children, the children - think about the children. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. Why get jobs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Heehee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Did you ever wonder why divorce laws in most states... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. So, Hillary is correct when she claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Yes. I hear she occupied her days by giving White House tours to 4H Clubs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Gee, I dunno. Maybe she used all that corporate money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Thou shalt not covet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:27 AM Response to Reply #46 |
77. I doubt many covet this endorsement.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:51 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:46 AM Response to Reply #79 |
81. A Crappy endorsement from a sleazy paper.. yippee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. and yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #81 |
94. Another Obamamite making whine out of sour grapes.(eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. I'm far from an Obamamite.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:04 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Let us know how you spell your name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I wrote to my congressman and Senators asking them to vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. You do seem to be singling her out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Nope, I've raised the same issue about Edwards, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. OK, this is a good enough resting point to our exchange. Peace n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:08 AM Response to Reply #45 |
73. i figured that out too, but guess what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuffleClaw
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
90. zzzzzzzzzzzzzing ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
75. Actually, unlike Hillary, they didn't get their jobs because of their husbands n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:30 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Clinton got her job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:28 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. Would they have given it to her if she wasn't the wife of Bill Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #80 |
86. Would VP AL Gore ever have gotten his job... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Azathoth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #86 |
100. Al worked his way up and punched his ticket just like every other politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:46 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. In Tennessee no one ever forgot who his father was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:25 PM Response to Reply #80 |
103. Bobby Kennedy didn't live in NY either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #75 |
87. There are those who say Bill would never have gotten his job were it not for Hillary n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
12. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. Its a conspiracy. Women hellbent on taking over the world. They'll be burning bras next. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. and wearing pantaloons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Sacre bleu !!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Here's the list of editorial board members: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Looks like 8 women and one man. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. No. Nine on editorial staff. Six voting members of the board. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
18. gee, would have hated to see what you would have said if the members were black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. That's totally different because, eh... well it is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
95. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Or white male !! LOL ! nT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. If they were black, they'd be endorsing Obama. Duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. That's different, you know.......it just is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemKR
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
62. blatantly sexist post!!!! :-P |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
25. More like the wining and dining of Des Moines Register editors/staff/Yepsen worked wonders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
33. You accusation is very... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. Joe Biden supporters are so reasonable. i love it. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Yes we are. Thanks for the support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
39. Sounds like the same "Oprah is touting Obama cuz he's black' argument. lame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #39 |
105. wait! isn't it because Oprah's a woman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
42. Probably filled with Condi Rice wannabees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
44. The OP is pretty stupid. People at DU need to stop playing on race and gender... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
48. So why didn't they endorse Rudy then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ewellian
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
50. Why did they endorse John McCain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:21 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. McCain? Because they want to end the war ! ::scratches head, confused::: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
55. Most voters are women, too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
57. Did the mostly male ed boards endorse men? Yes? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
58. Oh oh oh oh.....get that folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkySue
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:22 AM Response to Reply #58 |
72. Exactly. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
59. So Much Hate...So Litttle Time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
63. Ya know... I haven't met a woman yet who stored her brain in her uterus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. does that mean women can like take their brains out of their heads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:25 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampster
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. But that's exactly where lots of men put theirs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:19 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Well....now that ya mention it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
67. That's not fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
71. every woman in this forum should be pissed at your comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
76. This is...sad. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginchinchili
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
82. Sad, but predictable. That's what we've come to now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
85. all the dem candidates should demand Kucinich be at debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
88. Before the endorsement: "Edwards will win, and it'll be a huge coup!" After the endorsement: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
91. What a bunch of cackling shrill voiced heifers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
92. Your comment is very sexist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dugggy
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
97. Thank you Demoines Register! This should put Hillary over the top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleBlue
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
98. It would be nice if we had a more representative board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
99. The Des Moines Register has been wrong on their choices since at least 1988 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
101. God who got a hold of all those sour grapes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
102. "The Des Moines Register editorial board is composed of mostly women..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC