|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:33 PM Original message |
Des Moines Register Editorial Board declares Edwards not Corporate friendly enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. That part disgusted me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. Wow. That explains a lot! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. It's indictive probably of the changing of the editors from 2004 until now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. is it a locally owned paper? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. It's own by Gannett |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
46. That's all we need to know. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. What I found sickening was this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. ::cracking up at last line of post::: n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. Newspapers are corporations, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
8. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. considering they endorsed Edwards in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Someone must have offered them a good deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. They endorsed Edwards in 2004 because they thought he was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Why do we have to be gracious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. You don't have to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. yeah, they woulda been all hootin' and hollering if it had been edwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Do you know what I think is lame? You suckin up to a war monger in John McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
34. LOL!!!!! McCain is crazier than a freaking loon! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #15 |
42. But they ADMITTED that Edwards isn't a big enough corporate suckup for them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. The Des Moines Register stated that it did not endorse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tired_old_fireman
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. I know, isn't anti-corporate a good thing for a democrat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #30 |
41. BINGO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:43 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. Great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. And this is exactly the way it needs to be "spun".. hate to sound calculating, but %*$&, I do NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
13. Same applies to Obama - I noted their endorsement seemed to applaud politics as usual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. This is the lyin' excuse they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
40. Absolutely! The Des Moines Register's endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. That was the best part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. I wonder if Edwards is gonna come out swinging at Clinton now? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cal04
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. Campaigns Woo 3 Iowans for Paper’s Endorsement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
20. That solidifies it - I'm voting for Edwards!!!!!!!!!!!!! rec'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
21. And they were all pissy because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. They want media consolidation rules lifted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
26. Big Kick and R!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
27. But they also said: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Geez.. this endorsement is RIFE with contradition ! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. It really is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:05 AM Response to Reply #27 |
44. Well of course they seldom see it...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
28. They were willing to overlook Clinton's negativity I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Good point. I'm sure Iowans won't overlook it, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
36. It's not even mentioned...so she's ready to lead after she's pissed off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
35. The rag that excluded Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
38. Edwards should campaign using this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tex-wyo-dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. Totally agree, JE should use their reason to support Hil... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
39. Kicking for relevance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
45. Wow! Not Corporate friendly enough?That's a bad thing in Iowa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
47. I hope the American people had enough of corporatism to stand up to it & demand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tex-wyo-dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
48. "not corporate friendly enough"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
49. More negativity from ObamaNation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. You realize this is about Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
51. So, are Iowans "corporate" then?? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC