|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:54 PM Original message |
DMR's Clinton endorsement is full of holes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. I like Obama too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Just pointing out the muddle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. You're pointing out YOUR muddle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #7 |
40. The only divisiveness in DU is 70-100 core Hillary haters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Actually I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liskddksil
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
29. Newspaper Endorsements Don't Mean a Single Thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Endorsements from local newspapers are always the result of a strange mix |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. One part of the mix is that they are owned by Gannet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
48. i remember the paper when it had really good journalists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. Thanks for the fantastic analysis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. Boo - Fucking - Hoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:12 AM Response to Reply #4 |
30. it's not so impressive on the other boards either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
5. Heehee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. You're usually more intelligent than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. What's unintelligent about my glee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. If you think this is bad, go check out the DMR board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. What's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:33 AM Response to Reply #18 |
43. Just wait a couple of weeks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. It's the quality of the writing, stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
38. Emptyness is a clue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:58 AM Response to Reply #38 |
54. It felt like a split decision to me as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:14 AM Response to Reply #17 |
32. Ah Yes, Now It's the "Vast Left Wing Conspiracy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:16 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Giggle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:20 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. LOL--"Fun," Hillary Agrees With You N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:21 AM Response to Reply #17 |
37. Actually, I never "desperately hoped" Obama "would get the endorsement" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:55 AM Response to Reply #37 |
50. Whaaaa!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
31. supporters of leading candidates don't whine about the assholeness of rivals.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
35. Love the latest Iowa poll with Obama EIGHT points ahead of Hillary, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Doesn't bother me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. I really just don't understand how ANY true democrat who has been upset for 7+ years can support HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:26 AM Response to Reply #25 |
53. and I don't understand how any true democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. So if this endorsement FOR Clinton is meaningless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Congratulations to Senator Clinton and her supporters on the endorsement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
10. I still say the DMR endorsement hurts her by raising expectations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. This will slow the bleeding though, and she may be able to ride this into the holidays. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
15. I liked the part about Edwards the best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. That's very interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Truly interesting, so, are we talking corporations here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Exactly.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Fighting corporations is great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lyonn
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. How about the corps working with "us" for a change? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:56 AM Response to Reply #41 |
51. Work with us, we work with them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Sat Dec-15-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
26. Is Rahm Emanuel on their board? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fightindonkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
28. Another Obama Fangurl Whiner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Are all your posts attacks on Obama and his supporters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
44. You make your candidate look bad by this constant whining. big deal, dmr didn't endorse obama.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. I agree, big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:54 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Don't be so holier than thou, not a good quality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:57 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. You think that's a well-written endorsement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
47. No sour grapes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
55. So the endorsement is invalid? would your guy want it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:25 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Yo ass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:29 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Busted once again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC