|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:06 AM Original message |
Frank Rich: "Mrs. Clinton’s shrill campaign continues to cast her as Nixon to Mr. Obama's Kennedy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. Any of the men called "shrill"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. There is certainly nothing 'shrill' about Hillary's speaking style/pitch... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
60. Once again, Team Hillary shoots down valid criticism with shouts of sexism..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Don't you get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:47 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. Gotcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
68. Your buddies at the DLC call Edwards Shrill n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:22 AM Response to Original message |
3. Upper East Side cocktail party nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. His Expertise Is In Reviewing Plays |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
against all enemies
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
70. With that comment you have lost all credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAbuchan08
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
86. Have you ever been to Manhattan? That's Hillary country - for the uninformed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:29 AM Response to Original message |
4. Shrill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
61. Using the english language properly is not sexism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Funny how only woman are judged by the tone n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAbuchan08
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:53 PM Response to Reply #65 |
87. I judge Bush by his tone all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:34 AM Response to Original message |
5. So does this mean Hillary is a crook? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:35 AM Response to Original message |
6. what an unreadable piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
44. Cali, you put perfectly into words my reaction, as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andromeda
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
7. What a sexist piece. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Edwards is "Angry" not shrill. And "Shrill" is not exclusive to women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
8. "Shrill" Is A Word Applied To Women By Men Who Can't Get Laid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. No, you're wrong. I just googled "shrill" lot's of applications to men and asexual groups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:04 AM Response to Reply #19 |
41. I Think You Missed The Intent Of My Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greeneyedboy
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:48 PM Response to Reply #8 |
88. exactly. love Frank Rich, not a big Clinton fan, but "shrill" is a low blow. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
10. k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
11. You people crack me up; Rich said her campaign was shrill, not Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Awww... What a load of petty reactionary whining by this bunch.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:48 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. When Did It Become Reactionary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
99. I'm trying really hard to not pick on anyone unless opinions are requested. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:06 AM Response to Original message |
12. Shrill is not the best word to describe the Hillary campaign...more like condescending... arrogant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
92. Give it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
13. "Mrs. Clinton" - that gives the game away. Sexism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:14 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Do tell; when did she stop being a "Mrs."? That is lame. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:24 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Informed Folks Haven't Used "Mrs." As A Salutation In Nearly Forty Years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Lighten up, Frances. I hear * called Mr. all the time. Why the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Mr. And Ms. Is Gender Netral Language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. And had this article been pro-Clinton, you'd be whooping it up. As it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:43 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I Am Defending Feminist , Progressive Principles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. No, you're making mountains out of molehills. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:50 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Opposing Sexism Is Not A Trivial Matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:56 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. I'm dismayed you're dismayed, but why don't you comment on any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:59 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Once Someone Uses Racist Or Sexist Imagery I Don't Give Any Credence To What They Say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:09 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Gimme a break; you just don't want to face the real issues addressed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:33 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. I Just Strenuously Object To The Use Of Sexist Imagery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:35 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Hahaha! You're like a broken record! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #47 |
53. I Am Dismayed That You Find Sexist Imagery Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #47 |
97. Really! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Her own White House web page refers to her as "Mrs. Hillary Clinton." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. I Am Disappointed That The White House Still Uses Language More Suitable To The 1950's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:00 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. DSB - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Of course you are correct DSB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:45 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Isn't that interesting-thanks for looking it up. I wonder how this will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
90. It's a standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:39 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. WTF? Most people I know use Mrs. And I work with fairly well-off people extensively. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Being Well Off Is Not Synonymous With Having Progressive And Feminist Values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #30 |
59. I live in NY in a solidly liberal area. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:50 AM Response to Reply #15 |
34. What?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:51 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Ms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. ah. ok. Ill go with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:57 AM Response to Reply #15 |
38. what tripe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:01 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. " It is interesting who wants gender neutral language and who doesn't." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Well, MRS. Clinton sure likes using her HUSBAND MR. Clinton, doesn't she? MR. Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:42 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Again With The Mrs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #13 |
46. Blame the New York Times Copy Desk, not Rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:38 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. He's An Editorialist Not A Reporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #48 |
66. Commonly accepted? Not in the Times, it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Two Points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RufusTFirefly
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:43 AM Original message |
All your points miss THE point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleBlue
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
91. Mrs. is still proper English, and still used in British English today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
20. What an absolute crock of crap. Obama couldn't be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
49. i wish i could recommend your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:47 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:36 AM Response to Reply #20 |
98. I wish I could come across just one of your posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
21. Dang: Rich just exposed himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
24. Excellent piece by "Mr. Rich." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. i heard it was unreadable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
43. Hillary's got this odd, ponderous speaking style that can seem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmkramer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #43 |
57. They said the same thing about Al Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:42 AM Response to Reply #57 |
58. They Said Al Gore Addressed His Fellow Americans As If He Was Addressing Five Years Old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
73. What if it's our true opinion of her speaking style? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elspeth
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
62. Shrill is an anti-female slur. Frank Rich needs to check his balls at the door and use his brain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
63. "Mrs. Clinton’s shrill campaign continues to cast her as Nixon to Mr. Obama's Kennedy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #63 |
72. But Kennedy would still have carried the electoral vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Good catch. So the math seems to say...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Interesting article; thanks for posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
67. Obama should apologize for his surrogate's sexist attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #67 |
74. Yes he should, but will he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #67 |
81. Why would a candidate apologize for what a newspaper editorial writer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
76. I have to go along with Mr. Rich. Hillary's goon squad, and many of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antiimperialist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
77. Frank Rich hates the Clintons and Gore, for some reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Stop the whining! Playing the "hate" card is as tiresome a red herring as the "sexism" card. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Thats funny considering all the whining you do on here everyday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:20 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. That's all you've got, Hillaryworlder? I contribute more than ad hominem attacks, unlike you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #84 |
93. WTF ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. If you want rational discussion with me, try not insulting me as a conversation starter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 09:34 AM Response to Reply #94 |
100. How can we have a rational discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
83. Rich is a liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Give examples of when Rich was a "liar" because I think you're full of Hillaryworld BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
89. I liked it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #89 |
95. Thank you for seeing right through to the heart of Rich's message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
96. Gawd dammit, Rich! You sexist! Haven't you talked to Krugman lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC