|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:14 AM Original message |
During Edwards interview on CBS w/Scheiffer he talked about the DeMoine Register |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Happy to be #5 - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
61. Happy to be #84! lol. YouTubes of Sunday Morning Shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
2. I Didn't See The Interview... But I Heard He Was Going To Be On CNN... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. He's on This Week with GeorgeS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. And Edwards was very strong in that interview too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I am sure the CBS interview will be YouTubed and he did very well on THIS WEEK w/ George S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Edwards scares the crap out of corporations - he'll equalize their power... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. "It seems the DMR does't mind Edwards TALKING about "Two Americas" as long as he doesn't deign to DO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
36. Good post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
62. Corporations need regulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
7. K&R for truthiness!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
8. Rec 10. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I see Iowans as thinking for themselves too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Agree. These folks know they've got first-ups and my guess is they're |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Be still my heart......I have my 2 seatbelts fastened.....rocky ride ahead!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Hi there, Ninga. Good post, as per your usual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 09:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
56. There appears to me to be a lot of delusional holy rollers in Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. Let me tell you why he will not concede that point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Calling Edwards An Ambulance Chaser Is Not Correct... He Went After |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Abraham Lincoln was an "ambulance chaser" for more than 20 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. see below. I think some people misunderstood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. He spent a lot of time defending the railroads, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Unfortunately everybody's got some dirt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
48. 'course, it was easier then since the ambulances were horse-drawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Ha ha ha ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:47 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. you miss my point. That's the image they will try to create |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I understand what you're saying, the neutralizing thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Okay... "My Bad" Or Missing The Point! Thanks For Clarifying n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
13. Did you use the term "shrill" in the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
14. the Register might have done Edwards a favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
15. Good for Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
58. Newspaper support for candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
16. Our man Edwards has the fire of Truth in his heart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #16 |
59. I hope so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. I think that his attendance at the Bilderberg meeting is part of what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
17. Did you see his interview on Late Edition? Wow.. he went into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Thank you, you made my point. Edwards far from panders. He is tough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #17 |
64. Just a hunch... but I'm betting that it will come out later that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
18. I want a leader who scares the crap out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
19. I Just Caught The Interview... He Really Handled It Well!! It's More Than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Chici, glad you saw it. Yes, you are right, his is getting better all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. KICK!! Hanging With "Our" Guy! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
31. Yes, he said they had major disagreements and he did NOT back down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. I sense a shift in the political wind.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisainmilo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
32. Integrity, Guts, and Soul |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. May I quote you? And welcome to the most exciting primary in history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lisainmilo
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:10 AM Response to Reply #40 |
66. Yes, you may, and.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
35. Exactly. When he wins he will dance with the ones that brung him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
37. And the insurance companies scare the crap out of me. I'm with Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
38. Edwards is to corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EV_Ares
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
41. K&R, thanks for a good positive outlook on this. However, I think they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
42. Oh please...he should have handled it like Joe Biden did... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngharry
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Edwards vs Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucognizant
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 06:46 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
43. We faithful - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
44. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
45. #48 and more sure to come. BTW, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
47. Go John! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Infinite Hope
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
49. K&R for the once-in-a-lifetime maverick who is Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
51. Good point. If anyone was worthy of a "pander" it's the Des Moines Register. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
52. Pander, schmander, as I think it was posted at one time. For whom, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MalloyLiberal
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
53. The media hates Edwards because he thinks they need to be regulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:18 AM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Regulated and jailed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connonym
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
54. K&R because Edwards is the man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
57. If |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
63. My husband works in the insurance industry and they are NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark D.
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
65. Scared How |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC