|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:08 PM Original message |
Obama acknowledges he is not for--contrary to what he has been saying--a ban on lobbyists in the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. he would have to keep oprah out of the white house otherwise. she IS a corporate lobbyist nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. Umm. Ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. DESPERATE!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. wait for it... wait for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
6. Ooops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Tom I would expect better from you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I just posted below in a reply I could have given you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Fair enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. No you don't, but thanks for offering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
7. Gosh...shocking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
8. But what Obama has actually proposed is more nuanced and complex and does provide a path for Washing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I am predisposed to believe your assessment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. It looks like a good set of reforms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Then there are those who oppose any candidate simply because their popular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
9. LOL oh I see its more bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. And yes DESPERATE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. And Obama told you this on his psychic hotline? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. its in your article you just conveniently cut it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. I see the official Obamanation "ooops!" spin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. All I see are the words left unsaid.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. color me shocked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. No, color me shocked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemKR
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Mr. "Audacity to Hope" stumbles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
24. Desperate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. In his first two weeks as a US Senator.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. No homework allowed. Talking points are talking points and facts shall never get in the way.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:04 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Obama supported Lieberman when it was important not to.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 04:02 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Maybe Obama just thought it was important to have semi-moderate voices in the Senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 06:13 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Any poor excuse you can muster is better than none |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 06:29 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. You should ask Big Dog about that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleBlue
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
25. Can't ban associations or due influence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caseman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
26. To all the Obama supporters, no offense... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EffieBlack
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
32. He's right - all lobbyists aren't bad and he shouldn't shut the door completely to them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
33. What BS! You conveniently left out the part which details Obama's very restrictive plan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC