|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:32 PM Original message |
Kuchinich is a great guy, but he will never win ... can't happen. Forget it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think in the case of the "can't win naysayers" it's more that they don't want him to win, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Oh, please, I'd love for Dennis to win, but idealism is what gave us Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Voting fraud gave us Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Thank you for saving my sanity with your response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
89. Where did I say that Bush fairly won the election? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
43. And 90,000 Nader voters in Florida. If just 1% of them had been less "pure," Gore would have won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #43 |
57. Or Bush would have changed more ballots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Bush changed ballots in FL? I think you're mixing up your conspiracies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #58 |
65. I have to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Oh, not *all* of them would have voted Gore. 1% is sufficient. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:33 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. if you are looking for such a small number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #58 |
140. Uhm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
64. Gore won Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #43 |
90. Precisely n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:41 PM Response to Reply #43 |
136. Yeah, how dare they vote for the candidate they believe in? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
87. Voter fraud and Nader gave us Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #87 |
105. No, ELECTION fraud gave us bush and cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:37 AM Response to Reply #105 |
129. Vote fraud is the term that is generally used. And Nader was an issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #129 |
133. Get the definitions straight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #133 |
135. My definitions are straight. "Vote Fraud" comes from the original book of many years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Too lazy to type 4 more letters to be precise. Ok, whatever. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #137 |
145. Tell that to the New York Book of Style n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Hello? this is a PRIMARY election, which by definition is to pick BEST Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
92. And you've just repeated roughly word for word another post I made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Idealism didn't give us Bush. Fascism gave us Bush. And theft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. And 90,000 Nader voters in Florida. If just 1% of them had been less "pure," Gore would have won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
91. A big enough counterwave would have given us something like 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:30 PM Response to Reply #91 |
111. You left out the Supremes and a Reep-controlled media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superkia
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
109. But when the game table is slanted, your way we lose everytime! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:31 AM Response to Reply #109 |
127. The game table is slanted but it's a matter of survival ... it's the nature of the game |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. That's my take too. It shows a lack of anything more substantial to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
125. you're dead right, DLC stooges would plotz if he won.. princess Clinton must be victorious! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. We are primates. Most humans think like primates. Primates want Alpha Males to lead them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Dennis is offering Democratic voters an opportunity for a bloodless revolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheModernTerrorist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
49. I'm beginning to feel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
88. I don't believe that much in any politician however ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Thug
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. Wow. I guess I'm not a primate. I tend to work against the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
86. Where in my post did I speak out in defense of the alpha male concept? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Thug
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #86 |
121. Well, I didn't say you defended it..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:38 AM Response to Reply #121 |
130. I think it's an attitude that is here ... it's a reality for us to fight against |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Thug
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #130 |
144. On this we agree! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katadin706
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
46. On the contrary . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:04 PM Response to Reply #46 |
85. I said most humans think like primates. The human primate is patriarchal, like our brother chimps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #85 |
94. I'm curious about the numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. Change is incremental, over time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:06 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. Hmm, that may be the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:35 AM Response to Reply #102 |
128. I said incremental and it is the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think he has the same problem, in reverse, as Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Personally, I think Dennis looks quite "presidential" .. deports himself with wit, intellegence, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I agree that he deports himself with wit, intelligence and often makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Thug
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. What the hell does "looks Presidential" mean? Like doddering idiot RayGun with a Slicko grease-do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Please don't put words in my mouth. I never said it was the determining factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Thug
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. It shouldn't be a factor at all. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:52 PM Response to Reply #37 |
56. Shouldn't isn't isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. Just remember Abe Lincoln. He weren't purty. But he was a hell of a President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. I agree but I think before the age of constant video stream it was a differentt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. We are the poorer for this sort of thing. Americans are way too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Couldn't agree more. Thanks for getting what I am trying to say! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
51. So how do we fight that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. Kucinich has my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. I love how he often uses the word "Imagine..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
10. I think that even with all the bellyaching, many folks don't really want change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
62. I think you're correct, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. He is low on my 08 list, and it has little to do with electability. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. So it must be his height? or the UFO thing? which is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. No, but good luck with your candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. It was a genuine question, no condescension intended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. Here's my thing on Kucinich.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. This is much less about "liberal v. conservative" than it is about saving America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. No, it won't fucking happen if we fucking imagine it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. it's a terrible waste of a great candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Well, if you imagine it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. I'm imagining the revival of America, and have a candidate who is too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
96. It's funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
18. Unfortunately, just as in '04, Dennis has run a lousy campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 02:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. I can blame the M$M all I want to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dantyrant
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #23 |
60. Sure, but that's now what I'm talking about n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
50. And that's just the tip of the iceburg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. How many of these posts must we endure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Well, excuse me!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #26 |
84. Get this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dark
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #84 |
108. Then you will have no room to bitch if Mittens or Hucky win the election and we're stuck with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:05 AM Response to Reply #108 |
124. I've always known better than to blame Nader for 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:52 PM Response to Reply #124 |
138. Excellent! Can I recommend your post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #138 |
149. Of course you can, lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:05 PM Response to Reply #124 |
142. Bravo, LWolf... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 08:06 PM Response to Reply #142 |
150. My hat is on: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not Me
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
29. DK has my vote in the primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
47. I don't see any other choice really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
38. Kucinich is last on my list. It has little to do with "electability." He'd be incompetent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. So where have our "allies on the Hill" gotten us so far? No where, that's where. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. 67. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. If you're going to keep throwing those numbers out, don't forget the unlucky 13 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. "real" defined retroactively, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:13 PM Response to Reply #55 |
61. Yes, only conspiracy-prone nutcases doubt the sound judgment of the DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. 67. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:25 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. 42 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whosinpower
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #38 |
53. What have your allies on the hill given you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. 67. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
79. 867-5309 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stuartrida
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
59. You should have seen him as Cleveland's mayor. Big drama, little results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #59 |
70. didn't he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:28 PM Response to Reply #70 |
78. Yes, but that was "wrong" of him to do so.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #59 |
82. Speaking as an expatriate Clevelander, your post is incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #82 |
95. I can understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:03 PM Response to Reply #95 |
101. It's laziness IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:20 AM Response to Reply #95 |
126. DLC are right of centre.. they are the ones who continually shout down real progressives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:30 PM Response to Reply #38 |
69. inflexible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #69 |
74. Two reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #74 |
148. So you insist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
48. If he can't run a campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #48 |
72. Now DK "can't run a campaign"? cuz one newspaper sez so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. How's he doing in the polls again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:23 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. so who's you candidate in the primary? do you let polls influence your vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:32 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Biden's my intellectual choice. I may well vote strategically for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:25 PM Response to Reply #80 |
110. I like Biden too, and Edwards as well.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Edwards has been surprising me in his polling vs. the GOP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #112 |
116. I could feel okay about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. No need to accept inevitability until it's actually here, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Because he hired two campaign managers who had never worked a campaign before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:51 PM Response to Reply #75 |
99. So THIS is how they win,eh?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #99 |
104. Yes, you win by raising money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #104 |
106. Gotta remember Dennis has a day job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
67. SCHIP. 'nuff said. {nt} |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:52 PM Response to Reply #67 |
83. But not enough thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
93. Yeah but if you go around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #93 |
103. What WAS I thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FtWayneBlue
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
76. Any who do not believe that DK can win, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #76 |
81. Or, rather, believes America when 46% of it says would vote against him, while 8% would vote for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:16 PM Response to Reply #81 |
122. rasmussen sez it, so it must be true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:24 AM Response to Reply #122 |
123. There are many good reasons to vote for Dennis Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #123 |
134. I never said Dennis would be a shoo-in, did I ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
97. He was alright until his Paul embrace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Ending the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #97 |
107. They are both anti-war. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:01 PM Response to Reply #97 |
113. They're both anti-war, and both committed to ideology over practicality. In fact, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #113 |
115. Yes they are both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. Ron Paul can draw a lot of support from a disillusioned Republican party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:56 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. You might be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. Ron Paul is very pro-corporate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #97 |
139. They both voted against war with Iraq, something that can't be said about HRC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SunDrop23
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
114. He can't win. I agree. We've covered this a thousand times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
messiah
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
131. The media reflects the views of the public in regards to DK very well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crawfish
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
132. Of course he can't win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
141. We can't live without the "Swift Boat" dynamic in the elections. We're addicted to the struggle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
143. STOP Bringing UP Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libface
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
146. So Kucinich raised a total of $131,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 05:40 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. Whatever "leader" America gets in November |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC