|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DuctapeFatwa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:23 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should 3rd party/independent political activity be outlawed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kalian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hell no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. No, but anti-disruption rules at DU should be more rigorously enforced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Absolutely! At DU, you're supposed to support the Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuctapeFatwa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I'm asking about law, not rules on message boards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Killarney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
20. I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Of course not., but being a vulture who preys on idealists is shameful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. Anyone constitutionally eligible can run -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurikanDemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. Only for the Democratic Party. Republicans should be able to do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. No, I think third parties should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Meldread (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. No, in fact I run on the total opposite side of the track. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhite5 (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 12:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. I very much agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-22-04 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. You've got to be kidding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. No, but pseudo-radicalism sure is funny!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
12. Look at me! I can make strawmen polls! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
13. Perot probably HELPED Clinton win in 1992 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edzontar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 11:05 AM Response to Reply #15 |
26. He criticized Bush endlessly. He softened him up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
14. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
16. "right to peaceably assemble" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddhamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
17. the Democratic Party's new slogan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dhalgren (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #17 |
22. The way a lot of Democrats think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
18. So, who are the 8 fascists, I wonder? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:55 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Don't hold your breath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
19. Zeig Heil! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:54 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. It should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DuctapeFatwa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 12:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Your post contains an inaccuracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doomsayer13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
21. 3rd party is self defeating but free speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning bush (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
25. What a ridiculous question. I chose not to vote. --nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveSZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 11:07 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. What is this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cuban_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-23-04 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
30. Not only 'No', but 'HELL NO!' ... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC