|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
quinnox
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:39 PM Original message |
History shows why the Register endorsement is so pivotal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
49. I am so enthusiastic to work for the Clinton Campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Whatever: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. It's bad for Clinton but would have been a great endorsement for Obama, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. you got it: polls dont favor obama bad, ooops polls favor obama = the word of god nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. No, it still wouldn't have meant anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Actually, many carry those newspapers into the voting booths with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. I see that too and I'm sorry but those people are idiots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I believe those papers are a safety guard for many who don't vote a straight ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Nothing wrong with that but voting for all the endorsed candidates and initiatives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gwells
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
53. There are no voting booths in a caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. How many tv ads have you seen highlighting newspaper endorsements... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. And John Edwards...let's not forget him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yuugal
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
47. Not sure whether the endorsement would have helped Edwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. LOL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. Ever? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
38. And lost 49 states n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. That wasn't the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:32 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Never won the presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Either won or finished a strong second. How many won? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Possibly, but I don't think Clinton can survive a "strong second". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I think Hillary could survive a strong second -- to Edwards, especially... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. It'd be tough to overcome, in my opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. . I doubt Obama's support would go to Edwards in NH since Edwards doesn't have the money to compete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. It's hard to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. You could be right. I am not confident in any specific predictions right now - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
36. This is true and anything can change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
32. nah, she's never depended on Iowa. She can survive a second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. She's never been the expected winner in Iowa? Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. You couldn't have been. She was undecided as to whether |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:11 AM Response to Reply #35 |
51. Cali is right, she was never the favorite to win Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. delete-wrong placlle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Pivotal??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. The last candidate who won after a DMR endorsement was Mondale in 1984. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Really? So much for 'pivotal'! LOL! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Yup, although for some, it depends on what the meaning of "pivotal" is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I'm not expecting Hillary to win Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 03:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. We'll see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Not if it's Obama who beats her. And then Edwards' supporters will go to Obama. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. This might give Clinton a shot at finishing second in Iowa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
25. I think an endorsement of Hillary won't have as much impact as it might had it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
26. Congratulations! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. And here I was going to say how statesman like of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Franc_Lee
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
27. Interesting, however when it comes to Barack Obama? ... All bets are off, the man is an exception... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caseman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
34. Don't like Hilary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:35 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Are you misspelling her name because you don't like her or is there another reason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caseman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Yes, I took the missing l to do this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Hey that's good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
44. So many sore losers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Spin, spin, spin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 02:19 AM Response to Reply #44 |
52. Excellent post.(eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DivorcingNeo
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. Oprah and her circus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
48. Congratulations to Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC