|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 05:09 PM Original message |
2nd choice support in Iowa: Edwards 28%, Obama 20%, Hillary 14% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. That may not be enough for Edwards to get 1st though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. I've been waiting for a second choice poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think Edwards will win Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
forsberg (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 06:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. I think alot of Gephardts support went to Edwards in 04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 01:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Lot's of Gephardt supporters, and lots of Deaniacs, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. The 29 percent for Edwards, 24 for Obama, 15 for Hillary numbers are most important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Actually, it DOES make sense to include the 2nd-choice numbers for the supporters of the top tier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 02:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
6. "Among those who have participated in a caucus before, it’s Edwards 25%, Clinton 25% and Obama 23%" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. The fact that Edwards is tied for the lead among prior caucus participants is more important than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 03:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Agreed (in retrospect). Prior caucus participant support numbers should have been the focus of my OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. "Candidacies could be made or lost". Nice that the United States of Iowa gets to decide for us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 02:40 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Actually, they don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. Now we know why Newsweek put him on the cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 06:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. I think so too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. I honestly don't know if the DMR endorsement swings many votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-16-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. They are afraid he is going to win, and don't want egg on their face |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
14. Hmmm....better Edwards than her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-17-07 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think that means Hillary loses. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC