Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"A foe of Yucca is a friend to Las Vegas" - Hillary most consistent on the issue...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:29 PM
Original message
"A foe of Yucca is a friend to Las Vegas" - Hillary most consistent on the issue...
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 05:30 PM by SaveElmer


One subject I haven’t read much about lately is the federal government’s long-term plan to bury the nation’s high-level nuclear waste in Nevada’s Yucca Mountain, which is just 90 miles from the population center in Las Vegas. I haven’t read very much simply because there hasn’t been that much.

Until now.

For a good while, Nevada’s senior U.S. senator, Harry Reid, with an assist from the rest of the Nevada congressional delegation, has used his persuasive abilities and his position as majority leader of the U.S. Senate to thwart at every turn the nuclear power industry’s plan to bury its problems in our desert. That is no small undertaking.

Harry has gone up against every monied interest in Washington and, so far, has defeated their efforts to jam the dump down our throats. What was a virtual certainty when President George W. Bush chose Yucca Mountain as the place to dump the nation’s nuke garbage — in the face of scientific evidence showing it was one of the worst and most dangerous places to do so — quickly became an underdog effort once Harry Reid got on the case.

In short, if there were a Superman fighting nuclear waste and the devastation that could result from it in the world’s entertainment capital, Sen. Reid would be wearing that cape. As an aside, what is most incredible to me is that the newspaper the Sun is delivered with and certain Republican leaders in this state are doing all they can to persuade the voters to “unelect” Harry the next time out. Do they think Nevadans are that stupid?

But I digress. The newspaper stories this past Thursday made clear that the government’s efforts to dump on Nevada have not slowed down. The effort by the Energy Department to move toward licensing next year got a boost when a judicial tribunal ruled the process can move forward.

It was a tactical loss for Nevada, to be sure, and more important, it brought home the need to continue to press our fight against what Clark County’s studies have shown could be economically devastating for our community. Forget our health. What about our money?! Think about no jobs, no home values, no business values ... actually, no business!

So why talk about these two subjects today?

Because they are related. If you step back and try to look at this presidential race in simple terms, I suggest you look at the candidates’ positions on Yucca Mountain, because that will tell you almost all of what you need to know.

The three top Democratic candidates all profess to oppose Yucca Mountain — especially when they are campaigning in Nevada, an effort made easier when most of the world now realizes how dangerous and foolish it would be to dump high-level waste in Yucca Mountain.

But what did they do when it came time to stand up and be counted on a critical vote on Yucca Mountain’s future in 2002? Did they side with President Bush, who promised Nevada he would not dump on us but did it anyway? Or, did they take the side of Nevadans who needed their help more than ever before?

Hillary Clinton, who has nuclear power plants in her own state, was under significant pressure to screw Nevada — as Congress did in 1987 when it singled out Nevada as the only state to be considered for a nuclear waste dump — but she didn’t. She was on our side in 2002 when we needed her and voted with us, and she is on our side now.

What about John Edwards, who also has power plants in his home state and was under similar pressure from the nuclear power industry when he was a U.S. senator? He caved. He wasn’t running for president back then so he couldn’t have cared less about us out here. He voted with President Bush.

As for Sen. Barack Obama, the record is less clear. He is from a state covered with nuke power plants and would, therefore, be under the kind of pressure that made his Illinois colleagues vote to cover their own behinds at the expense of ours out here in the Silver State, but he was not in the Senate at the time. He is free to say whatever he wants and hope Nevadans believe him.

As for me, I am going with the person who exhibited political courage and scientific understanding. When the chips were down she voted with Nevada’s families. There is honor in her position. There is courage in her vote. And there is one more irrefutable reason why Nevadans should be prepared to tell the country where we stand and with whom we stand for president.

Brian Greenspun is editor of the Las Vegas Sun.


http://politics.lasvegassun.com/2007/12/a-foe-of-yucca.html






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please...Hilary's votes mean nothing....
...execpt when you can use them to bash her! Thanks for the post! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. When Hillary becomes president she'll do the right thing for Nevada.(eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I will just quietly say that I believe nuclear power is essential to combatting climate change,
and that opposition to Yucca is 10% pandering to those who oppose anything nuclear and 90% pandering to NIMBY kneejerkers.

Disagree if you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So, do you want nuclear waste in your backyard?
I wouldn't call it pandering...I'd call it listening to those peopel's concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I would not have a problem with a nuclear storage facility in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. aren't the supporters of Yucca Mountain the Nimby's?
by the way, Biden opposes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I know. I disagree with Biden on this.
I believe that the fears of nuclear waste are valid, to an extent. However, I believe that the pollution caused by coal is far, far worse, both in direct effects and in its effects on global warming. I would prefer renewable energy, of course, but until I see a proposal for such, I support both construction of nuclear plants and construction of subterranean storage facilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rock_Garden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm grateful that Hillary said no to Yucky Mountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. And who hasn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nevadans had no problem when they were spending a Billion to dig that hole.
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 06:34 PM by Vincardog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. No, no, no!

I have family there and follow both Reno and Las Vegas papers. There has been strong, steady opposition all along (despite the economic temptation). It's not just a "nimby" issue: there are great concerns about the transportation involved before the waste would arrive at Yucca.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC