|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:06 PM Original message |
"I'm gonna give you the Democratic Party back; I'm gonna give you the White House back; and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. What? Has he decided to vote for Hillary then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Haha - fat chance! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The way it was worded...couldn't resist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. uh yeah -- and tell me again how much MONEY she's gotten from the HMO's and such? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. Yup.She would give us "back to the lobbyists"Remember she said they are "people too" ! Hah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
42. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. Good one!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
39. Funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. I haven't made up my mind yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
6. I am with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Exactly - no more business as usual! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
41. but it doesn't bother you when Edwards vows to have repukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm liking him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. Its Joe Trippi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Well, what's the reason for Obama NOT saying what liberals want to hear?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Any examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. His unity message is a form of pandering imo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Well, there was that "ex gay" gospel singer episode.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Not really rhetoric |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. He should be "representing" the left imo - that's not pandering. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Obama says what this liberal wants to hear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. But would you mind answering the question I asked you in #10?? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. First |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. It's possible that Obama is more liberal than he sounds to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
38. It's being who he is, and always has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:09 AM Response to Reply #38 |
45. He scores high on trustworthiness because he avoids tough votes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
36. I thinkk that Trippi has something to work with in Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. Howard Dean, is that you? er no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Was it Howard or Joe?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Trippi has taken Howard's formula |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I believed Howard... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. We already have heard it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:28 AM Response to Reply #20 |
47. It makes sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
65. Well, the TRUTH does eventually OUT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
14. i love his there for the people attitude. he rocks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
23. I believe Edwards' promises. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
62. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
28. I think Edwards is right that there can be no compromising with them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Yep, he knows the definition of "insanity" is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Yes. They are ruthless bastards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
29. Edwards panders to the 2% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Or he represents the part of the Democratic Party that hasn't sold its soul. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. ...and more of that "progressive"* utopian-speak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Lol - your message is exactly why we need to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. how can you take back what you never had? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:06 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. The party hasn't always been polluted by the DLC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. but the party has always been dominated by centrists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Not sure about that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. I'm completely sure about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Obviously, it's a matter of perspective... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. no, not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:32 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. I don't particularly care about your studies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. why try to change the subject? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. As usual, you avoid the question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. as usual, you change the subject and start a new question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Lol - good try! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. sorry. You're avoiding historical perspective on this like it's the plague |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 08:14 AM Response to Reply #70 |
76. Not so - historically the party has NOT been owned by corporations... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. This current definition of "centrist" is very different from the old moderates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:40 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. no it isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:40 PM Response to Reply #64 |
73. The devil is always in the details |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. Deleted message |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. "progressives"* like Mythsaje and republicans - cut from the same cloth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #57 |
77. Today you can't talk about centrist Dems without talking about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #29 |
54. Either you're a troll or you just like to stir the pot for its own sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. clearly you're a troll or misinformed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:29 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Then you just like to stir the pot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. if presenting unpopular facts is "stirring the pot," guilty as charged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #63 |
71. Doesn't bother me in the least to be contradficted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. I guess you can either get used to my "ways" or ignore my posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Tue Dec-18-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #60 |
78. That poster preaches the DLC way day in and day out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
35. Bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-16-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
43. Edwards is a great speaker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 08:12 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Yeah, Kerry is a wonderful guy but the campaign was pretty lackluster. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bongo Prophet
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Yep. So lackluster. It was the Bushlovin' media that IGNORED how lustrous it really was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Well, that's true too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
50. Yeah, FUCK 1/3 of Americans!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-17-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #50 |
58. Which third are you worried about?? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC