|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:21 AM Original message |
Poll question: What Percentage Of The Popular Vote Will Nader Get In 2004? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Florida_Geek
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. Other than Jeb and Goodhair in Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. Math. With. Ralllllllllllph! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxster
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. I'm guessing about half of his 2000 results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
4. Depends on how much the media whores play him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I bet he receives 3% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. Nader does not have near the support and momentum that he did in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Nader is totally inconsequential in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. In the vote tallies, sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. You got it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmbryant
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Absolutely correct. All this Nader fuss is much ado about nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:11 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. My concern is that his results won't automatically be miniscule. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cornus
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I voted for Nader in 2000, not again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peaches2003
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. The popular vote doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal72
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
12. Dean neutralized Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monte Carlo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 12:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. From 2.8% down to .3%...Only 1 in 10 of those who supported him in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC