|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:06 AM Original message |
Who here knew Biden used to be anti-Roe v. Wade, STILL opposes all abortion right for women who need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
1. "I voted for the partial-birth abortion ban ... I make no apologies for it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
2. Who here doesn't know Biden is a STAUNCH Catholic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yet you bitch about Kucinich -- also a Catholic -- for originally being anti-choice before becoming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I beg your pardon? I'm not a BIDEN supporter, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I didn't "accuse" you of being a Biden acolyte. I accuse you of bitching about Kucinich for the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I'm not "DEFENDING" Biden, though. See, you assume advocacy when there is none. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fenriswolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 12:03 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. hold on the only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. No--he decided to run for the presidency. THAT's why he flip-flopped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fenriswolf
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 02:28 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. oh yes of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 03:57 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. It's not just "a wiki' though--but that's the way to dismiss pesky facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. damn, now i'm hungry for pork chop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. A little home made applesauce on the side??? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 01:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
31. So was Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 02:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
33. I wouldn't ask a devout Jew to sit down to a pork chop dinner, but I'd be pissed if he outlawed pork |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Well, Biden has said he doesn't want to "outlaw pork"--but his dislike of it is a factor for some, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 02:44 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Well, he'd outlaw "pork" for poor women on publicly funded health care and third-trimester "pork" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 04:05 AM Response to Reply #39 |
41. And that's a justification for withholding your vote, assuming that is a key issue for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. If wishy-washiness on abortion rights was Biden's only flaw (or if there were no good candidates), I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Well, whatever. Like I said, you look at the platform and you make your call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 02:21 AM Response to Reply #56 |
57. On abortion, Biden went from shitty to moderately bad and Kucinich went from shitty to great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #57 |
59. That's not entirely correct. Biden went from somewhat lousy to a hundred percenter, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 12:09 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Hundred percenter? He's 100% anti-abortion for women on public health care, and 100% anti-3rd term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 06:26 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. NARAL, to which I have linked in this thread several times, bases their percentage assessments on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Because the ranking goes by votes, Biden does fine during years where there are no votes on publicly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 07:49 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Take the methodology up with NARAL if you don't like it. It's their system! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
4. BUT Biden would NOT litmus a USSupCt nominee on the issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Nor would Kucinich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dtotire
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 10:57 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. He Would Still Make the Best Candidate n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Didereaux
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. I agree whole-heartedly...BIDEN be da man! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
10. Roe would still stand under Biden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:20 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Only because Biden flip-flopped on Roe v. Wade. How can Biden supporters beat up Kucinich on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I am a Kucinich supporter, as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
11. Biden is a Catholic. He and I hold the same views. Nothing wrong with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. I don't want to assume, so: are you saying you're anti-choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. No, I believe abortion should be legal, for all those who don't believe--as I do-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 01:15 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Do you believe that rich women who can afford private insurance should enjoy that right and poor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:13 AM Response to Reply #32 |
64. You do know your candidate is pro-life ---- don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donsu
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
13. didn't know, thanks - cross him off the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kceres
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I totally agree. I just changed my mind about Biden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
15. Did Biden ever get 0% ratings from NARAL? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. When Roe v. Wade came out, he opposed it. More recently, he got a 36% NARAL rating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. How recently? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Biden had a 36% rating from NARAL on December 31, 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 04:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. And he's been rated a hundred percent in the subsequent years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
medicswife
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
19. How can you call the author of the violence against women act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Have to give credit to Biden when he earns it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. I didn't call Biden anti-women. I was just pointing out Biden's record on reproductive choice after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
23. Biden STAUNCHLY supports Roe v Wade -- regardless of what his personal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
38. This is such a lame attempt by the OP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 05:11 AM Response to Reply #23 |
45. As do I , but I am NOT a fan of partial birth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxanne
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. there is no such thing as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Wed Dec-26-07 03:02 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. OK, so let's call it 'I am sorry I waited TOO LONG' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Wed Dec-26-07 03:20 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. 88% of abortions occur during the 1st 12 weeks of pregnancy; less that 1% during the 3rd trimester. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Wed Dec-26-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Read what I said in my first post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 03:36 AM Response to Reply #52 |
58. But Biden would outlaw third-term abortions even where the fetus has a fatal defect, not to mention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Wed Dec-26-07 11:57 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumpy
![]() |
Wed Dec-26-07 02:13 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Hear hear. And that's the way it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:49 PM Response to Reply #54 |
65. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
28. Interesting. i didn't know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Mon Dec-24-07 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
29. Biden is the only Dem candidate with a current NARAL grade of less than A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 04:26 AM Response to Reply #29 |
42. No he isn't. What a BLATANT falsehood. NARAL doesn't even GIVE letter grades. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Now you're really going to make their heads spin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 12:25 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. I just cannot STAND this stupid bullshit!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
livvy
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 04:41 AM Response to Original message |
44. OK, You got me.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Tue Dec-25-07 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
49. Before 1988, Al Gore was also "pro-life" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
61. Dennis Kucinich was pro-life until he ran for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demommom
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #61 |
68. "Biden will do all he can to protect RoevWade".......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
67. He is on record supporting Roe v. Wade and will not appoint Judges who oppose it. You want more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Czolgosz
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 10:58 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I want more. I want abortion rights for women on public health care and I want Biden's nose out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC