|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-26-07 01:47 AM Original message |
About Hillary |
Let me say up-front that I'm not violently opposed to a Hillary candidacy. I think she'd make a decent president if elected, certainly a zillion times better than Chimpy (which, admittedly, may be damning with faint praise). I do think running Hillary would be risky, given the baggage she carries with her but assuming she runs a decent campaign, I'm pretty sure she would win.
That said, Hillary and her supporters are starting to worry me. I've twice been accused here recently of not endorsing Hillary for sexist reasons. This is ridiculous. It's just as easy to accuse Hillary supporters of racism for not backing Obama. Granted, some people (even on DU) are against Hillary for sexist reasons but the majority of us simply don't believe she'd be the best candidate. Is that really so hard to believe? Presumably, most Hillary supporters feel the same way about Obama, Edwards, et al so why is it so difficult to believe that we would feel the same way about Hillary? Want a female candidate I'd be entuasiastic about supporting? OK, Barbara Boxer. Also, Hillary's supporters (and, on occasion, Hillary herself) give me the impression that she is expecting the nomination by right. That was a cartoon a while ago that featured Hillary and one of the other candidates (might have been Obama) in which Hillary was saying something along the lines of "That's my presidency you're running for" and rightly or wrongly, that's the impression some of us are getting. Granted, the media coverage of Hillary (and most of the candidates but as teh front-runner until recently, Hillary got it worst) has been diabolical. The MSM probably reached it's lowest point when there was actually a discussion about Hillary showing cleavage. You know you've reached a new low when your news media feels they should comment that a candidate has girl-parts. BREAKING STORY: Shock, horror, Hillary has tits! Newsflash to the MSM: Unless she's diagnosed with breast cancer or starts posing for Playboy, I don't really care about Hillary's breasts (or Edward's haircut, for that matter). Still, Hillary worries me. Her healthcare proposal strikes me as going in exactly the wrong direction, funelling more money and power to the insurance companies. Most people lack health insurance because they can't afford it, are they going to be able to afford it simply because Hillary's proposal requires it? I doubt it. If I'm misunderstanding her proposal, then someone please explain it to me (going back to my second point about her supporters, I have yet to see a Hillary supporter defend her proposals for anything). Then there's the video game issue. Now, I'm a gamer so I may be more up-to-speed on this than most but Hillary co-sponsoring legislation about Manhunt 2 is, well, weird. First off, the original game was crap and minus the publicity (when it was wrongly tied to a murder) probably wouldn't have sold especially well. I haven't played it but I'd imagine the same holds true for this iteration. The problem is that the US (and my own country) has a rating system for movies and video games for a reason. Sponsoring legislation to raise the rating of a game strikes me as either failing to understand the nature of the gaming business or pandering of the worst sort and neither option is reassuring. Then there's her faith. Now, I'm a man of faith (Satanist as it happens but still faith) and faith has it's place in politics but teh rumours flying around about HRC's faith are concerning. If Hillary shares a mainstream version of teh Christian faith or even one of the more peaceful minority versions (say, Quaker), fine. There's no problem with that at all. But she could have diffused a great deal of worry simply by coming out and saying something like "Yes, I am a Christian but I'm not an extremist like President The-Rapture-Is-An-Exit-Strategy". I'm also baffled as to why she hasn't done so. Something like 55% of the nation professes Christianity but is not represented by the Unholy Trinity of Falwell, Robertson and Phelps (one down, two to go). Reassuring those voters that you share much the same faith as them just strikes me as an obvious move when religion plays such a huge part in US politics. Perhaps she feels she shouldn't have to respond to such rumours. That's very laudable but possibly short-sighted in this day and age. Finally, there's ending the abuses that The Long Night has inflicted upon us. Granted, most of the other candidates haven't said much about rolling back the extra-constitutional powers which Bush has appropriated either but as front-runner, HRC should be out front on this issue. W's administration has stolen vast powers which the executive was never meant to have from signing statements to (effectively) declaring wars. That desperately needs to be rolled back and Hillary, as front-runner, could send a powerful message by pledging to do so but she hasn't. Perhaps it's naive of me to expect that any potential President would opt to surrender any part of their powers (same as I'm naive enough to expect them to disavow torture without a second's thought) but still, concerning. Let me reiterate: Hillary would not be an awful president. She wouldn't be my choice but I wouldn't be too upset if she ended up in office (and I'm not supporting Obama, so you can put that instant dismissal away right now). I just have concerns. I could have done this for Obama and Edwards too and may yet do so but as the leading candidate, Hillary gets examined first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-26-07 02:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. HRC would be an awful POTUS. We've been there. We've done that. |
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 02:37 AM by countmyvote4real
For the record, I don't care if our CIC/POTUS has tits or balls or any combination of them. I care about their policies. In other words, I care about how they think and what they choose to tell us and then cross-reference that with their public record.
Consequently, I am SO over the Clintons. Why can't they retire already or just split. Don't make us willing participants in their inevitable divorce/separation/marriage or whatever it is that compels HRC to seek this power. I am certain that she doesn't have a clue or care about me. I'm one of her NY constituent, however, her office does do reasonably prompt form letter responses No more dynasties for me. Especially, when we can examine their record. And then she is financed by Rupert Merdoch. (Not entirely, but enough to give me pause.) We can do beter. And we have better options. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yuugal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-26-07 03:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. K & R |
Giving the nomination to the candidate with the most baggage and corporate cash is terrible strategy for the dem party.....if in fact its still pretending to be the workers party. Picture 2009 with Hillary, Pelosi, and Reid: yeah thats gonna be sweet huh? NOT! A trifecta of sellout is what we are going to get.
I feel like I'm watching a train wreck in slow motion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-26-07 03:46 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I'M funded by Murdoch |
Well, indirectly. Fox brought out the company I work for about a month ago.
|
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-26-07 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
4. Here's a funny thing: opposition to Hillary appears in direct proportion to ignorance about Hillary. |
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 07:04 AM by Perry Logan
Senator Clinton supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent in 2005.
Senator Clinton supported the interests of the The Humane Society of the United States 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Trust for Historic Preservation 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 95 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Education Association 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Wilderness Coalition 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 95 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Children's Defense Fund 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Association of University Women 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Organization for Women 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group 91 percent in 2006. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group 100 percent in 2005 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence 100 percent from 1988-2003 (Senate) or 1991-2003 (House). Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Public Health Association 80 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Service Employees International Union 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 93 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 93 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers 84 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Worker 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees 88 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Federation of Government Employees 83 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Committee for an Effective Congress 95 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 100 percent in 2005. According to the National Journal - Composite Liberal Score's calculations, in 2005, Senator Clinton voted more liberal on economic, defense and foreign policy issues than 80 percent of the Senators. According to the National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy's calculations, in 2005, Senator Clinton voted more liberal on social policy issues than 83 percent of the Senators. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Alliance for Retired Americans 100 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Disabled American Veterans 92 percent in 2005. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Bread for the World 100 percent in 2003-2004. Senator Clinton supported the interests of the The Partnership for the Homeless 100 percent in 2003-2004. http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=WNY99268 She was promoting universal coverage before it was cool. Furthermore she helped to create the SCHIP program. And most importantly she was dead on in the debate the other week where she said political will was the most important thing needed to push health care reform through and we know without a doubt she has that. She has fougt unrelentingly for a woman's right to choose as well as women's rights both domestically and abroad Create a Strategic Energy Fund - Hillary has proposed a Strategic Energy Fund that would inject $50 billion into research, development and deployment of renewable energy, energy efficiency, clean coal technology, ethanol and other homegrown biofuels. Hillary's proposal would give oil companies a choice: invest in renewable energy or pay into the fund. Hillary's proposal would also eliminate oil company tax breaks and make sure that oil companies pay their fair share for drilling on public lands. Instead of sending billions of dollars to the Middle East for their oil, Hillary's proposal will create a new clean energy industry in America and create tens of thousands of jobs here. Champion a Market-Based "Cap and Trade" Approach - Hillary supports a market-based, cap and trade approach to reducing carbon emissions and fight global warming. This approach was used successfully to limit sulfur dioxide and reduce levels of acid rain in the 1990s. By capping the amount of emissions in the environment and allowing corporations to buy and sell permits, this approach offers corporations a flexible, cost-efficient method to do their share to reduce emissions and combat global warming. The program will reduce emissions, drive the development of clean technologies, and create a market for projects that store carbon dioxide. 20% Renewable Electricity Standard by 2020 - Hillary believes we need to shift our reliance on high carbon electricity sources to low-carbon electricity sources by investing in renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind. As President, she'll work to require power companies to obtain 20 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2020. Make Federal Buildings Carbon Neutral - Hillary believes that the federal government should lead the way in reducing carbon emissions from buildings. Buildings account for 40 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, and the federal government owns or leases more than 500,000. Hillary would require all federal buildings to steadily increase the use of green design principles, energy efficient technologies, and to generate energy on-site from solar and other renewable sources. By 2030, all new federal buildings and major renovations would be carbon neutral, helping to fight global warming and cutting the $5.6 billion that the federal government spends each year on heating, cooling and lighting. Protecting Against Exposure to Toxic Chemicals - Hillary wants to make the products we use safer, especially for children. There are tens of thousands of chemicals used in the U.S. and hundreds of new chemicals introduced each year, but little health testing is conducted for many of them. Hillary would require chemical companies to prove that new chemicals are safe before they are put on the market, and would set more stringent exposure standards for kids. She would also create a "priority list" of existing chemicals and require testing to make sure they are safe. To improve our understanding of the links between chemicals and diseases like cancer, Hillary would create an "environmental health tracking network" that ties together information about pollution and chronic diseases. Hillary's Record In the White House, Hillary led efforts to make adoption easier, to expand early learning and child care, to increase funding for breast cancer research, and to help veterans suffering from Gulf War syndrome who had too often been ignored in the past. She helped launch a national campaign to prevent teen pregnancy and helped create the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997, which moved children from foster care to adoption more quickly and the number of children who have moved out of foster care into adoption has increased dramatically. She was instrumental in designing and championing the State Children's Health Insurance Program, which has provided millions of children with health insurance. She battled the big drug companies to force them to test their drugs for children and to make sure all kids get the immunizations they need through the Vaccines for Children Program. Immunization rates dramatically improved after the program launched. Hillary has been a leading member of the Environment and Public Works Committee since she was elected to the Senate. Today, she chairs the Superfund and Environmental Health Subcommittee and in that capacity has promoted legislation to evaluate and protect against the impact of environmental pollutants on people's health and clean up toxic waste. Global warming and Clean Air Spoken out forcefully about the need to tackle global warming in hearings, speeches, rallies and on the Senate floor and co-sponsored "cap and trade" legislation. Worked to reduce air pollution that causes asthma and other respiratory diseases by writing and helping to pass new laws to clean up exhaust from school buses, and other diesel-powered equipment. Supported legislation to reduce pollution from power plants, including harmful emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and carbon dioxide - emissions that contribute to poor air quality, smog, acid rain, global warming, and mercury contamination of fish. Aggressively fought the Bush Administration's ill-advised attempts to weaken clean air laws. Improving Water Quality and Protecting Drinking Water Helped to overturn the Bush Administration's attempt to allow more arsenic in drinking water. Cosponsored legislation to protect lakes, rivers and coastal waters by fighting the spread of destructive invasive species, such as the zebra mussel. Helped ot pass new clean water laws, including measures to protect New York City's water supplies and clean up Long Island Sound. Protecting Public Lands Fought oil company efforts to pen the Artic Wildlife Refuge in Alask and Pacific and Atlantic coastal waters to drilling. Cosponsored the Roadless Area Conservation Act, which prohibits road construction and logging in unspoiled, roadless areas of the National Forest System, and voted for additional funding and manpower to combat forest fires in the west. Reducing Dangerous Chemicals and Cleaning Up Hazardous Waste Supported legislation to restore the "polluter pays" principle by reinstating a chemical company fee to fund cleanups of highly contaminated "Superfund" waste sites. Cosponsored the "kids-Safe Chemical Act," which requires chemical companies to provide health and safety before putting new chemicals in consumer products. Proposed legislation to create an environmental health tracking network to enable us to better understand the impact of environmental hazards on human health and well-being. Tackling the Toxic Legacy of 9/11 Pushed for health care benefits for first responders, residents and others whose health has been impacted from breathing the toxic dust and smoke in New York City after 9/11. http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/8/20/134810/677 Hillary Clinton co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a state-level alliance with the Children's Defense Fund, in 1977. In late 1977, President Jimmy Carter (for whom she had done 1976 campaign coordination work in Indiana) appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation, and she served in that capacity from 1978 through the end of 1981. For much of that time she served as the chair of that board, the first woman to do so. During her time as chair, funding for the Corporation was expanded from $90 million to $300 million, and she successfully battled against President Ronald Reagan's initial attempts to reduce the funding and change the nature of the organization. Following the November 1978 election of her husband as Governor of Arkansas, Clinton became First Lady of Arkansas in January 1979, her title for a total of twelve years. Bill appointed her chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee the same year, where she successfully obtained federal funds to expand medical facilities in Arkansas' poorest areas without affecting doctors' fees. Hillary Clinton chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee from 1982 to 1992, where she sought to bring about reform in the state's court-sanctioned public education system. One of the most important initiatives of the entire Clinton governorship, she fought a prolonged but ultimately successful battle against the Arkansas Education Association to put mandatory teacher testing as well as state standards for curriculum and classroom size in place. She introduced Arkansas' Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth in 1985, a program that helps parents work with their children in preschool preparedness and literacy. And a bit of stuff from the White House years: Along with Senator Ted Kennedy, she was the major force behind the State Children's Health Insurance Program in 1997, a federal effort that provided state support for children whose parents were unable to provide them with health coverage. She promoted nationwide immunization against childhood illnesses and encouraged older women to seek a mammogram to detect breast cancer, with coverage provided by Medicare. She successfully sought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health. The First Lady worked to investigate reports of an illness that affected veterans of the Gulf War, which became known as the Gulf War syndrome. Together with Attorney General Janet Reno, Clinton helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice. In 1997, she initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which she regarded as her greatest accomplishment as First Lady. Along with Senator Ted Kennedy, she was the major force behind the State Children's Health Insurance Program in 1997, a federal effort that provided state support for children whose parents were unable to provide them with health coverage.<124> She promoted nationwide immunization against childhood illnesses and encouraged older women to seek a mammogram to detect breast cancer, with coverage provided by Medicare.<125> She successfully sought to increase research funding for prostate cancer and childhood asthma at the National Institutes of Health.<43> The First Lady worked to investigate reports of an illness that affected veterans of the Gulf War, which became known as the Gulf War syndrome.<43> Together with Attorney General Janet Reno, Clinton helped create the Office on Violence Against Women at the Department of Justice.<43> In 1997, she initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which she regarded as her greatest accomplishment as First Lady.<43> As First Lady, Clinton hosted numerous White House Conferences, including ones on Child Care (1997),<126> Early Childhood Development and Learning (1997),<127> and Children and Adolescents (2000),<128> and the first-ever White House Conferences on Teenagers (2000)<129> and Philanthropy (1999).<130> Hillary Clinton traveled to over eighty countries during this time,<131> breaking the mark for most-travelled First Lady held by Pat Nixon.<132> In a September 1995 speech before the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, Clinton argued very forcefully against practices that abused women around the world and in China itself.<133> She was one of the most prominent international figures at the time to speak out against the treatment of Afghan women by the Islamist fundamentalist Taliban that had seized control of Afghanistan.<134><135> She helped create Vital Voices, an international initiative sponsored by the United States to promote the participation of women in the political processes of their countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton "...Hillary Clinton traveled to over eighty countries during this time,<131> breaking the mark for most-travelled First Lady held by Pat Nixon.<132> In a September 1995 speech before the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, Clinton argued very forcefully against practices that abused women around the world and in China itself.<133> She was one of the most prominent international figures at the time to speak out against the treatment of Afghan women by the Islamist fundamentalist Taliban that had seized control of Afghanistan.<134><135> She helped create Vital Voices, an international initiative sponsored by the United States to promote the participation of women in the political processes of their countries..." More: http://clinton.senate.gov/issues/nationalsecurity/israel/index.cfm http://clinton.senate.gov/issues/nationalsecurity/darfur The following are polls from progressive groups, rating Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, on how often they vote for progressive issues. For each group, http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/011142.php Clinton Vs. Barack Obama (progressivepunch) Overall Progressive Score: 92% 90% Aid to Less Advantaged People at Home and Abroad: 98% 97% Corporate Subsidies 100% N/A Education, Humanities and the Arts 88% 100% Environment 92% 100% Fair Taxation 97% 100% Family Planning 88% 80% Government Checks on Corporate Power 95% 97% Healthcare 98% 94% Housing 100% 100% Human Rights & Civil Liberties 82% 77% Justice for All: Civil and Criminal 94% 91% Labor Rights 91% 91% Making Government Work for Everyone, Not Just the Rich or Powerful 94% 90% War and Peace 80% 86% easures to protect New York City's water supplies and clean up Long Island Sound. HILLARY'S EXPERIENCE ON THE WORLD STAGE: Her historic speech at the UN Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 not only galvanized women around the world, it helped spawn a movement that led to advances politically, legally, economically, and socially for women in many countries over the next decade. Among other initiatives, she spearheaded the Clinton Administration's efforts to combat the global crisis of human trafficking. She persuaded the First Ladies of the Americas to use their collective power to eradicate measles and improve girls' education throughout the western Hemisphere. And she is widely credited with helping women in Kuwait finally win the right to vote. As First Lady and now as a two-term senator who represents the most ethnically diverse state in the nation and who sits on the Armed Services Committee, Hillary Clinton has become a fixture on international issues over the past 15 years. She has traveled to more than 80 countries, going from barrios to rural villages to meetings with heads of state. She has consulted with dozens of world leaders - Nelson Mandela, King Abdullah, Tony Blair among them -- on matters as diverse as America and NATO's roles in Kosovo, eradicating poverty in the Third World, and the plight of women living under the Taliban in Afghanistan. Today, she is one of the most influential voices in the world on human rights, democracy, and the promotion of a "new internationalism" in foreign affairs that calls for a balanced use of military force, diplomacy, and social development to strengthen American interests and security globally. While American First Ladies historically have made great (and often overlooked) contributions to our nation, Hillary Clinton's wide-ranging experience on international issues as First Lady is unprecedented. Indeed, she is the only First Lady to have delivered foreign policy addresses at major gatherings of the United Nations, the World Bank, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the World Economic Forum. Hillary Clinton has been fighting for the rights of children for special needs for decades. In her first job out of law school working for the Children's Defense Fund, she conducted research that led to Congress passing the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, the landmark bill mandating that all children with disabilities be educated in the public school system. later, she helped improve the education of children with special needs by working to reauthorize the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act. In 2005, she sponsored an amendment to increase funding for the act by $4 billion dollars. She also cosponsored the Personal Excellence for Children with Disabilities Act, a bill that promised to help schools recruit and retain new special education teachers, and better prepare general education teachers and staff to work with children with special needs. Most recently, she has called for greatly expanded funding to the National Institute for Health to investigate treatments for children with disabilities. And she has put forth a comprehensive and detailed plan to help children and families affected by autism, with numerous elements that correspond very closely to what families in the autism community have been demanding for years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-26-07 07:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. You have this saved to your desktop, right? |
I've seen you post this (or nearly identical pieces) at least half-a-dozen times. You didn't address the points I raised, you just gave me Hillary's resume and pimped how wonderful she was despite the fact that I never once said she would be a bad president.
This is roughly akin to giving a standard stump speech. Oh, and I'm dubious about "cap-and-trade" as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-26-07 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
6. kick for the morning crowd n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC