Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

88% of abortions occur during the 1st 12 weeks of pregnancy; less than 1% during the 3rd trimester.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:22 AM
Original message
88% of abortions occur during the 1st 12 weeks of pregnancy; less than 1% during the 3rd trimester.
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 03:23 AM by Tejanocrat


3rd trimester abortions occur for many reasons, including because the woman did not learn until the 3rd trimester of a fatal defect in the fetus (or a 3rd-term-developed health complication for the woman).

Why should abortion not be a decision between a woman and her doctor under such circumstances?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're totally right
and most people are ignorant to this fact. I wonder how many would oppose severely handicapped babies being born and raised in special orphanages at significant tax payer expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. 59% of abortions could be eliminated if women had greater access to contraception and education
More knowledge and control over their bodies, I'm positive is the best toll for reducing the rate of abortions in this country, not restricting access to medical care.

I see that the rate drops off dramatically from 9 weeks on. This clearly shows that, and please forgive the cliche, an once of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

And you are so correct about 3rd trimester abortions. These are clearly procedures given to women who wanted to have children, but made a heartbreaking decision to end their pregnancies.

If the anti-abortion/pro-life crowd really wanted to reduce abortions down between 80-90%, they would jump on board to a. help prevent unwanted pregnancies and b. help prevent birth defects with better and cheaper access to health care.

The facts are so overwhelming it's mind boggling that most of this crowd stand in absolute opposition to both positions.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Don't forget the effect of a decent job and reliable health care...
Although I guess you could say that access to health care and contraception are the same thing. But look at how abortions declined under the Clinton Administration, and all that happened was that working class people had more money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Excellent point
All these factors help adjust the pregnancy rate to more wanted ones than unwanted ones.

Examples of why progressive policies are much better than regressive right wing ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Abortion should be a decision between a woman and her doctor under ALL circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't believe that people think women have late term abortions for "convenience"
Yet there are many out there who believe just that, thanks to relentless forced birther propaganda. This requires one to believe that (a) there are women who will go through several months of pregnancy and then impulsively decide to terminate and (b) that said women will find doctors willing to terminate healthy late-term pregnancies. Both these types of people are mythical and it says something pretty disturbing about the mentality of the people who believe in their existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Is Biden our ONLY candidate who opposes 3rd-term reproductive choice and no choice for poor women
who receive publicly funded health care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r for equality
One more very important reason we must do everything we can to elect a Democrat as the next POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have transcribed surgery reports in California for over 30 years.
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 10:04 PM by AtomicKitten
Not once have I ever come across anything in the ballpark of a so-called "partial birth abortion," and, yes, that would have to be done in an acute care facility.

The only time that kind of late term intervention would happen is if the mother's life is in jeopardy. Most catastrophic chromosomal abnormalities are evident and acted upon much earlier on in the pregnancy.

The term "partial birth abortion" is and has always been a red herring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hell, without massive health problems, I don't think they're even LEGAL in most states.
The right-wing needs a huge dose of facts crammed down their throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Digit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. I have posted previously on my own situation which happened years ago
I was 5 months along when the fetus died inside of me. Unfortunately, I was being cared for by a rabid prolifer and did not even realize it. I knew the instant it happened which is kind of weird, but I had a "connection" with the life growing inside of me up until the time I felt the "disconnect".

I called my doctor and we had a sonogram...no heartbeat. He continued to leave it inside of me, "just in case". Meanwhile, more sonograms showed my uterus was growing smaller, and pregancy tests came out negative....no heartbeat still.

After a month of this agony, I called my old gynecologist. Another sonogram...uterus getting yet smaller, and no heartbeat.

Finally, when it began taking a toll on my mental health, I begged them to intervene and at first they tried to induce. Arghhhhh, the pain!

Then they did a D&C. My old doctor told me it was too mascerated to determine the sex as my body had been absorbing it for quite awhile. I had known it was a boy and had wanted confirmation of this.

If I had continued on with the nutcase ob, I might be dead right now.

Oh, I went on to eventually have a healthy daughter years later, so no need to feel sorry for me.

I just wonder where something like this would land on the "I had an abortion in a later trimester" bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thank you for posting this. It sickens me when I hear people justify votes to ban 3rd trimester
rights on the phony argument that it just affects women who needlessly put of their decision to terminate their pregnancy.

I can't believe that any self-identified liberals tolerate Biden's vote to criminalize third-term abortions (and his votes against all abortion rights for women on public health care).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC