It looks like the AFSCME mailer, attributed to the continuing trend of dirty politics and Clintonian triangulation, is starting to backfire.
The controversy continues over those anti-Obama mailers paid for by
Hillary-backing union AFSCME.
(snip)
... two AFSCME members -- Henry Beyer, the executive director of Illinois' AFSCME chapter, and Carter Woodruff, a former state treasurer of AFSCME in Iowa -- criticized the mailer on the grounds that AFSCME has had a long-held position against mandates for healthcare.
Beyer said he was "dismayed" to see the direct mail piece.
"We've always opposed individual mandates. We were very concerned about the Massachusetts plan," he said referencing the health-care plan passed under Gov. Romney in Massachusetts, which required state residents to purchase health insurance.
Woodruff had harsh words for his international union, calling the mailer a
"desperate attempt to attack" Obama and "hypocritical" considering the union's previous stances on mandates. He attributed the attack on Obama's gain in the polls. "Senator Obama has gained with Senator Clinton here in Iowa, and in some polls he was in the lead. Currently they are still neck and neck, and I think they are scared."
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/21/530523.aspxThe Edwards campaign is not pleased with the Clintonian dirty politics either:
"Iowa caucus goers have been sent a direct mail advertisement that appears to be an attack on Senator Obama by John Edwards, but is actually produced and funded by an organization supporting Senator Clinton," read a statement from the former North Carolina senator's campaign.
Jennifer O'Malley Dillon, Iowa State Director for the Edwards Campaign, made the following statement: "
There have been a lot of misleading tactics and tricks in the last few weeks, but we've just never seen anything like this before...
It's fine to have an honest debate about policy, but Iowans deserve better than planted questions and campaign fliers designed to fool them."
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/12/20/the_attack_is_in_the_mail.htmlI fully expect Hillary Clinton feign that she has no idea about any of this, much in the same way she lied about how she had no idea her campaign was planting questions in the crowd. Honesty is not a Clintonian trait, as has been proven too many times to count.