Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Last Stand in Iowa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:53 PM
Original message
Obama's Last Stand in Iowa
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 10:56 PM by TeamJordan23
Closing Argument: Obama's Last Stand in Iowa
December 26, 2007 9:49 PM

ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports: Claiming he got one of his Christmas wishes, eight hours of sleep, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., hit the campaign trail with a week to go until the Iowa caucus.

Obama said his other Christmas wish is to win the caucus.

At a campaign stop in Webster, Iowa, Obama said he thinks he’ll get just that, “Despite the skepticism, despite folks saying we couldn't do it -- here we are 10 months later and we are on the verge of winning Iowa.”

Obama delivered a slightly different stump speech, all under the umbrella message that has defined his campaign: change. The slightly different rhetoric will likely make up his final argument trying to woo Iowa voters over one last time.

At a campaign stop in Mason City, Iowa, Obama responded, without mentioning names, to former President Bill Clinton’s assertion that a vote for Obama would be a roll of the dice.

“The argument that's being made in these last 7 days... don't, you know, try something different because that's going to be too risky, you might not know what you're going to get. So even though you know what's been done in the past doesn't work, stick with it.”

Bill Clinton’s name also came up at a later event in Webster in which Obama compared questions about the former president’s run to his own.

“Back in 1991, there was a candidate being attacked in a similar way and he said that people were questioning his experience, he said you know what, there's a wrong kind of experience and a right kind of experience. My experience is the experience...is rooted in the real lives of real people.”

Obama spoke of “seeds of doubt” that he claims rival campaigns have planted in this campaign. “The problem is at the end of the campaign what ends up happening is people running negative ads or negative mail. They plant seeds of doubt. They say 'oh Obama he's young, is he electable enough?' …You know they say he's got that funny name, you know and they are looking through my kindergarten papers, I keep on telling folks that I’m Christian but they keep on planting seeds of doubt on this and that.”

Bringing up his top rivals by name, Obama also referenced their health care plans, for the first time using the word “punish” to describe their mandates for health care.

“Some of you have heard them say, Obama doesn't cover everybody. What they're really saying is they will punish you in some way if you don't buy healthcare and what I've said is, the problem isn't that people don't want healthcare, the problem is they can't afford it. And so if we can control costs, people will get it. So there's a philosophical difference there.”

Obama, making his way through the state on a “Stand for Change” bus tour is also courting caucus goers to be their second choice. He opened up his events asking people that even if they have made their minds up for another candidate, “we still want to be your second choice.”

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/12/closing-argumen.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Last Stand" Like Custer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If Hillary wins Iowa by a signigicant margin, it's probably going to be over for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Naw....He's got a bunch of support and a bunch of money. He's not going
anywhere for a while...even if he doesn't do well in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Good thing she won't.
It will be Obama or Edwards, with Hillary in 2nd or 3rd place.

Her campaign will deflate faster than Howard Dean's after his scream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Zogby: Obama is the only Democrat leading all 5 Republicans.
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 11:13 PM by AtomicKitten
Zogby: Obama is only Dem leading all 5 Republicans

Sen. Barack Obama is the only Democratic presidential candidate who polled higher than all five of the top Republican contenders in its latest national telephone survey of potential "general election matchups," Zogby International reports this morning.

Democrat John Edwards polled higher than three of the Republicans. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton edged out two, though all but one of her matchups produced results signalling nearly dead-even races.

Zogby's results, based on a survey of 1,000 "likely" voters that it says produced a margin of error of +/- 3.2 percentage points on each figure:

Obama led:

• Rudy Giuliani, 48%-39%.
• Mike Huckabee, 47%-42%.
• Sen. John McCain, 47%-43%.
• Mitt Romney, 53%-35%.
• Fred Thompson, 52%-36%.

(So, Obama's leads over Giuliani, Romney and McCain are outside the margin of error -- but not his leads over Huckabee and McCain. Remember, each figure's margin is +/- 3.2 points. So the spread between the results needs to be at least 6.5 points to be outside the margin.)

Edwards:

• Led Huckabee, 47%-41%.
• Led Romney, 50%-38%.
• Led Thompson, 51%-35%.
• Trailed Giuliani, 45%-44%.
• Trailed McCain, 46%-42%.

(So, Edwards' leads over Romney and Thompson are outside the margin of error -- but not his lead over Huckabee. And he trails Giuliani and McCain by less than the margin of error.)

Clinton:

• Led Romney, 46%-44%.
• Led Thompson, 48%-42%.
• Trailed Giuliani, 46%-42%.
• Trailed Huckabee, 48%-43%.
• Trailed McCain, 49%-42%.

(So, the only matchup outside the margin of error is McCain's advantage over Clinton. Zogby reports that Clinton "has improved her position slightly. A November Zogby Interactive poll showed her losing by small margins to all five of the top GOP candidates.")

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/12/zogby-obama-is.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Zogby predicted Lazio would beat Hillary,
If the 2008 election is about Republikkkan crime, corruption and incompetence the Democrats win easily. If the next election is about whether America is ready for a "black" president, then that's not so easy, especially with the electoral college favoring rural and western states. Furthermore, I don't think Obama can carry all the Gore/Kerry states, let alone add new states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Do you have a link to back up Zogby predicting that Lazio would beat Clinton?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Zogby predicted Gore was 1% ahead of Bush on Election Day 2000.
Every other polling company said Bush was ahead.

My memory doesn't fade or become selective like yours.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love it-'seeds of doubt' vs. being vitriolic and condemning the
campaign that is planting those seeds. He's a statesman! He's being diplomatic and logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
5.  Last stand? Really? That is one of the worst article titles I've seen here.
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 11:26 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
And, BTW, I'd respond the same way if any of our candidates' names were in the title.

Sheesh.

MKJ

edit for punctuation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
6.  maybe mrs O was right...If O doesn't win Iowa it's over..GOOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC