Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama camp implicates Hillary policies in Bhutto assassination (Six degrees of Hillary)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:54 PM
Original message
Obama camp implicates Hillary policies in Bhutto assassination (Six degrees of Hillary)
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Obama Adviser: Bhutto Assassination Reminds Us That Hillary Made Wrong Call On Iraq War
By Greg Sargent - December 27, 2007, 2:49PM

Okay, the battling among Dems over how the Bhutto assassination will affect the Dem primary is officially underway. Today after Barack Obama's closing argument speech in Iowa, Obama adviser David Axelrod parried questions from reporters who pressed him on whether the killing could help Hillary.

Here's one key exchange:
REPORTER: But looking ahead, does the assassination put on the front burner foreign policy credentials in the closing days?

AXELROD: Well, it puts on the table foreign policy judgment, and that's a discussion we welcome. Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq, and he warned at the time it would divert us from Afghanistan and al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that. Al Qaeda's resurgent, they're a powerful force now in Pakistan, they may have been involved -- we've been here, so I don't know whether the news has been updated, but there's a suspicion they may have been involved in this.

I think his judgment was good. Senator Clinton made a different judgment, so let's have that discussion.

Late Update: The Hillary campaign has now responded, accusing Axelrod of "politicizing" the situation. From Hillary spokesperson Phil Singer:
"This is a time to be focused on the tragedy of the situation, its implications for the U.S. and the world, and to be concerned for the people of Pakistan and the country’s stability. No one should be politicizing this situation with baseless allegations."
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/obama_adviser_bhutto_assassination_reminds_us_that_hillary_made_wrong_call_on_iraq_war.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe they should tell Evan Bayh
Who already released a statement saying people needed to think about experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. But this different, right?
I mean it IS Obama. So that's ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. When will you ever criticize Hillary?
Ever?

She Is Not A Diva.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. When will you ever criticize Obama?
Ever?

He is not a rock star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. And Hillary is not an effective statesperson
and Obama has never claimed to be a rock star. Here's a shock, his supporters like him for his style of politics and his policies. What is that so hard for you to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. I was actually responding to a comment
that says "Hillary is not a diva." I agree with you that many of his supporters support him for his style of politics and his policies, and I have no difficulty understanding that, thank you very much.

And yes, I'm aware that he's never claimed to be a rock star, just as Hillary has never claimed to be an effective statesperson. I suggest reading what I responded to before responding yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. What's it to you?
Jesus Christ, you got out of your way to criticize her.

I didn't know I had some obligation to criticize her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
57. Axelrod is using a strategy ploy to get out in front of Obama's INEXPERIENCE!!
by blaming Clinton for a concocted apparition from the dark side of the Obama camp!

It's ALL smoke and mirrors from the Obama campaign...to save the empty suit from political embarrassment..

It won't work..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
52. I am so sick of this tactic by Hillary supporters
When called to the mat about the extreme hypocrisy of their candidate, they STILL try to swing the criticism back to another candidate. I'm sick of it not because I think its effective, but because its so damn transparent that I can't believe people that would claim to share the same ideology as me would employ it.

For shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. Do you go bare foot when you walk on water?
Or can you use shoes.

Wouldn't that fuck up the shoes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM
Original message
Oh god forbid think about experience! Think about Donnie McClurkin and mentorJoe Lieberman instead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sick. You guys are really sick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
55. Team Hillary is scarping the bottom of the barrel this evening.
Its shocking in how disgusting it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama is a sneaky little sob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yep he likes stabbing people in the back.
GLBT community baby boomer's just to mention a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. shameless. you must have gone to underoo man's headline fabrication school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. His advisor should have keep his mouth shut on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, he should have...
Let's remember also, that Obama isn't too popular in Pakistan....

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2007-08-03-pakistan-obama_N.htm

Yeah, that Obama, some uniter he is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. Nevermind that Bhutto herself agreed with him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep theres the man who calims to have the message of "hope and change".
Yea right. :eyes:

What a fucking dick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Invading Iraq pulled the focus off of al Qaeda: T/F?
This is an illegitimate issue in what way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. This is a time of mourning not politicizing.
But then again when your campaign is in the toilet, you can expect shit like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Then how would you have answered this question?
REPORTER: But looking ahead, does the assassination put on the front burner foreign policy credentials in the closing days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. I would have answered with what I just said.
Whats so fucking difficult to understand about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. How would Evan Bayh have answered?
And what's so fucking difficult to understand about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Who cares? I don't ive a rats ass what he says.
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:07 PM by William769
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. No condemnation of Bayh for politicizing Bhutto's assassination?
Hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I'm a Hypocrite?
:rofl:

I don't like the SOB. want to try something else? Because everything you have tried here so far has failed.

P.S. you should understand what the word means before using it, then you wouldn't look like a ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Attacking others after doing the same thing yourself equals hypocrisy
That's rather simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. And how does Bayh fit in here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
61. but you care about Axelrod?
that is just like a Hillarite,
pay no mind to the problems in your own house, attack the neighbors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. One is paid by the Obama campaign and one is NOT paid the the Clinton campaign.
Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Axelrod responded to a question re: foreign policy
You want he should shut up because it's inconvenient for your candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. every single member of DU knows the answer is True
and yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
53. and i think he should have said exactly that. 23 Dems voted yay on iraq...
and 3 of them are running. axelrod should have wised up and put it like that in order to tout Obama's judgement. he doesn't need to fall for the bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. And here I was wondering who would be the first to blame Clinton,
"I don't see how this helps Obama. It can only hurt. Even if there is a connection between Iraq and Bhutto's death, this can only hurt. You don't blame your opponent for a political murder for which there is no direct connection between the assassin and your opponent. As for the Iraq invasion connection, that is tenuous. You cannot say but for the Iraq invasion, Bhutto would not have been killed. That is not the sole proximate cause of death. even HRC is not accountable for the supervening illegal acts of others."

"Wow! I can not believe he said that. Beyond the fact that the problems of resources in Pakistan are not related to Iraq (indeed, the Bush Administration has given away resources that the Pakistanis diverted to issues other than fighting Al Qaida), where was Obama on funding of Iraq and Pakistan for his tenure in the Senate? What did He do? According to Axelrod, is Obama to blame for the Bhutto assassination too? Outrageous stuff from the Obama campaign."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. What the fuck is this implicate shit?
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:02 PM by killbotfactory
nowhere did he say that Clinton should be blamed for the assassination.

The people who supported this stupid criminal war in Iraq do have some blame for diverting nearly HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS into a fucking quagmire while diverting resources to go after Al-Qeada in Afghanistan/Pakistan. That's undeniable. Spin it however the fuck you want, I'm pissed about it, and have been for the past four years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Oh please... it's in black and white
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:04 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq, and he warned at the time it would divert us from Afghanistan and al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that. Al Qaeda's resurgent, they're a powerful force now in Pakistan, they may have been involved -- we've been here, so I don't know whether the news has been updated, but there's a suspicion they may have been involved in this.

He is drawing a line from the IWR vote to Bhutto's assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It's in the fucking title
"Obama camp implicates Hillary in Bhutto assassination (Six degrees of Hillary)"

Are you fucking kidding me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. He draws a line from Hillary's vote to Bhutto's assassination. It's hardly ambiguous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. As if she was the only vote that counts? WTF?
NOWHERE does Axelrod blame Hillary - he blames the Iraq war. He didn't say it was her fault; only that it would not help her - as Scarborough and others were claiming this AM (and BTW, WHY were RW hacks claiming that this would HELP Hillary? You wonder?)

Hillary IS responsible, just as are all the other senators who voted for the IWR, and all the senators who have continued to fund the clusterfuck since - INCLUDING Obama.

That's the facts, jack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Notice he changed the title slightly...
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:09 PM by jenmito
I guess he finally realized he went too far with that ridiculous claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Yes, in response to complaints as to comprehension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I think it was due to complaints of a false statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. Implicating a person's actions as contributory to an event is what it is


But since words are supposed to communicate, when several people complain about the wording of something it is best to change it so that it will be better understood. So I did. Seemed like the best thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Axelrod was pressed on whether the killing could help Hillary.
He answered appropriately and honestly. It is a fact that going into Iraq (voting for the IWR) took our eye off the ball re: bin Laden and al Qaeda-those most likely involved in the assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. BTW, do you have any sense of irony?
You have been running around the board all day eagerly predicting Hillary's corrupt response, posting about Even Bayh's comments (which I condemned in your thread, by the way), and generally having a grand time playing partisan games with the Bhutto assassination.

Then your candidate's team goes WAY over the line (by any measure) in politicizing the assassination and you are indignant.

I criticized Bayh's comments. I don't know why you wouldn't see Axlerod's remarks as the same kind of dumb overly aggressive screw-up that is best forgotten, just like Bayh's tasteless comments were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. It's not ironic. Axelrod didn't volunteer a statement about how this could help Obama or hurt
Hillary. He answered reporters who kept pressing him with the question of how it could help or hurt Hillary. That's a far cry from volunteering remarks about how this incident shows Obama should be president and Hillary should not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. This place has just gotten sicker than I thought possible n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Where/how? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Areporter asked him a political question, and he advocated for Obama. Nothing wrong with what
he said. This IS a political issue--a juicy one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. The OP was making a point about Obama people's behavior--a point which you've underlined nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Your behavior, however, has been stellar
Bwah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. And I deeply respect your judgement on the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. of course not, had Clinton's camp made that suggestion you would be
screeching from the rooftops.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. The OP says that Axelrod was dealing with questions about whether
or not the Bhutto assassination "would help Hillary". What was Axelrod supposed to say--"yes, Obama is totally incompetent in this area, I think Hillary is the best!" It was a dumb question, because I don't think it helps Hillary or any of our candidates for a foreign leader to be asassinated. But he responded to a political question, and I applaud him for not ceding any ground on Obama's behalf. He's a good advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
62. Axelrod might have said "that question is inappropraite today, thanks."
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. WTF??? Unbelievable. Exaggerate much? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Okay, I added "policies"
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:06 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. First of all, he responded to reporters who pressed him on whether the killing could help Hillary
He didn't offer up that statement on his own like Evan Bayh did when saying times like this remind us we need an experienced, seasoned CIC. And HOW did they implicate HILLARY in tje assassination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. bad move nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. Bad move to answer a reporter's question???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. I guess Phil Singer wasn't aware Evan Bayh politicized the assassination without being asked about
it. Please. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
60. Kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
64. Axlerod is to Obama as Shaheen was to Clinton.
Except Clinton had the sense to fire Shaheen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC