Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Adviser: Bhutto Assassination Reminds Us That Hillary Made Wrong Call On Iraq War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:59 PM
Original message
Obama Adviser: Bhutto Assassination Reminds Us That Hillary Made Wrong Call On Iraq War
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:01 PM by babylonsister
FWIW, this one is the true headline despite the crap the Clinton supporters are spewing. Maybe their gal embarrasses them? :shrug:


http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/obama_adviser_bhutto_assassination_reminds_us_that_hillary_made_wrong_call_on_iraq_war.php

Obama Adviser: Bhutto Assassination Reminds Us That Hillary Made Wrong Call On Iraq War
By Greg Sargent - December 27, 2007, 2:49PM

Okay, the battling among Dems over how the Bhutto assassination will affect the Dem primary is officially underway. Today after Barack Obama's closing argument speech in Iowa, Obama adviser David Axelrod parried questions from reporters who pressed him on whether the killing could help Hillary.

Here's one key exchange:

REPORTER: But looking ahead, does the assassination put on the front burner foreign policy credentials in the closing days?

AXELROD: Well, it puts on the table foreign policy judgment, and that's a discussion we welcome. Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq, and he warned at the time it would divert us from Afghanistan and al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that. Al Qaeda's resurgent, they're a powerful force now in Pakistan, they may have been involved -- we've been here, so I don't know whether the news has been updated, but there's a suspicion they may have been involved in this.

I think his judgment was good. Senator Clinton made a different judgment, so let's have that discussion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. That Obama advisor (and whomever authorized that comment) should be ashamed of themselves
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM by LostinVA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. seriously. with 2 other candidates voting yay on iraq, and he calls out clinton...
he can kinda go f himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Sounds like he was specifically asked about Clinton.
"...questions from reporters who pressed him on whether the killing could help Hillary." Your argument doesn't hold water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. number 1, that question does not have hillary in it. 2...
Obama is a big boy and doesn't need to play the media's game. He should know better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Then you're not reading it correctly. He was specifically asked about
how Hillary benefits, per the article. I can't read it for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. i read it. i said THAT QUESTION. and in THAT "EXCHANGE" as ...
it is written there, it does NOT invoke her name, he does. and like i said, he's a big boy, he doesn't have to play their games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Why? What did he say that was wrong?
He simply said that Iraq diverted us from Pakistan and Afghanistatn. Very true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. How should he have responded to the question?
I guess he should ignore the fact that the Iraq war was a gigantic distraction from our fight against the terrorists who have been implicated in this attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. i think you put it very well, that the iraq war was a giant distraction....
etc. :). You should run. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary is gonna be PISSED. i hope she can deal with this calmly. i would be angry. jmo folks.
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:03 PM by annie1
that's kinda messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. What does she have to be angry about? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Obama said "we see the results of" ...'the iraq war and hillary's judgement.',....
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:19 PM by annie1
right after the death of a great leader and friend of hillary's. i personally think he shouldn't have gone there. that's just my opinion. it's not going to send me over the edge or anything, but i think there is a way to tout his own judgement in a time like this without pointing fingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I see the statement entirely differently. He was responding to a direct question.
We agree to disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Um it was NOT OBAMA - it was Axelrod...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. sry sry, i just came back to change that. sry. (shoot, time expired).
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 06:55 PM by annie1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama should tell him to shut up.
This looks really bad, and the msm is raising eyebrows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Why? What did he say that was wrong? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Because today is not a day for finger pointing.
They are focusing on the wrong thing.

I like Obama better than Hillary, and I just feel that these kind of comments will hurt him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I don't inerpret those comments as finger pointing.
We need to have a serious discussion on how to deal with Islamic terrorism. Nobody is blaming anyone for her death except those who shot her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Read the comments here and all over the internets.
This is hurting Obama. Close your eyes if you want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I don't know if it's hurting or helping, but I think he responded to the question appropriately. nt
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:22 PM by calteacherguy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you Babylon Sister. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama voted to fund Iraq war again and again. Is it his fault too?
Double standards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. He didn't say this was anyone's fault. What are you talking about?
He said this:

AXELROD: Well, it puts on the table foreign policy judgment, and that's a discussion we welcome. Barack Obama had the judgment to oppose the war in Iraq, and he warned at the time it would divert us from Afghanistan and al Qaeda, and now we see the effect of that. Al Qaeda's resurgent, they're a powerful force now in Pakistan, they may have been involved -- we've been here, so I don't know whether the news has been updated, but there's a suspicion they may have been involved in this.

I think his judgment was good. Senator Clinton made a different judgment, so let's have that discussion.


What's wrong with that? Good response, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. SO what does it have to do with IWR????
It's politicizing. Call it what you want. "The politics of hope" was so 2004..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. At least Clinton does not avoid voting on important issues.
The Obama people have it entirely wrong this time too. I am not a big Clinton fan but I do tire of Obama trying to remind everyone that he opposed the war in the first place. How do we know that for sure? He was not even in the Senate and if he was he probably would not have even shown up for the vote. He seems to avoid voting on anything that might stick to him later on depending on how things go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is the key phrase
"Obama adviser David Axelrod parried questions from reporters who pressed him on whether the killing could help Hillary."

It's a stupid-assed discussion led by Fear Inc., also known as the MSM, and the Clinton campaign is privately overjoyed about it. Of course Axelrod is going to bring the conversation around to judgment. That's where she's weak. It's called politics, folks, don't be so shocked and awed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R. The issues are related, and we need to have the discussion.
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:12 PM by calteacherguy
The Iraq war encouraged more terrorism, and distracted us from Pakistan and Afghanistan. Nobody is responsible for her death but those who shot her, but the issues are related and we need to have the discussion.

It's time for a better way. My vote is with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Just when I thout you couldn't go any lower, I was wrong. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. What are you referring to? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. I didn't expect that Obama
would start taking pages out of the Karl Rove playbook. Yes, its and adviser, but he's ultimately responsible for things said by his campaign.

Did he say that Clinton killed Bhutto, that she was involved in the assassination, or that she was responsible? No. He simply put the two together.

Did *&co. say the Saddam committed 9/11, that he was involved in 9/11, or that he was responsible? No. They simply put the two together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. This has nothing to do with Karl Rove. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. So, we were distracted from our mission in Afghanistan,and Pakistan.
on that I agree, but am I to think That BHO believes that our mission was to take out Musharif(sp)?
As it is pretty clear that he holds the blame for this assassination. Sounds like that whole inexperience thing is showing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama should make a public apology to Senator Clinton, and
this will hurt obama as it should and questions need be asked, where was Obama on funding of Iraq and Pakistan for his tenure in the Senate? What did He do? According to Axelrod, is Obama to blame for the Bhutto assassination too? Outrageous stuff from the Obama campaign.

Obama and his speech of hope made a u turn today and hope this will not destroy his campaign....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluewisdom Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. conflating...rovian style 101
:nuke: apologize bho!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. This has the potential (no pun intended) to blow up in Obama's face
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. This is pathetic..even for Obama...
Is this his message of Hope?
Stepping over a dead woman to put down a rival?
Classy...really classyy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. Axelrod should be Shaheened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Tweety will have an orgasm saying
what character he has for attacking Clinton..
then in the next segment..cry about Hillary kneecapping poor little Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. The Democrats are on the same page when it comes to Afghanistan
and Pakistan. I don't think this tragedy should become fodder for the primary war.

The truth is Pakistan is a very dangerous place; I think most Democrats supported the deal that would have made Musharraf president and Bhutto elected prime minister. So did Condi Rice. It was Dick Cheney who undermined the effort with his 100% support for Musharraf, no matter what Perez did, even when he re-stacked the Supreme Court and declared Marshall Law.

Yes, I don't agree with Hillary's vote for the IWR, but the Iraq War is Bush's war. It was Bush's idea to blow off Afghanistan and Pakistan, and let the situation there worsen, while W pursued his dream of making Iraq a "Jeffersonian democracy" with oil that would flow forever and endless work for private American contractors.

I can't get into these attacks no matter where they come from on something this tragic. All of the candidates should knock it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. I agree.
These attacks do not make them look good. Especially when we should be remembering Ms. Bhutto's life, not politicizing her or her tragic death.


:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
39. DING_DING And the winner is BHO!!!
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 04:33 PM by MNDemNY
The campaign of BHO is the first one in the Democratic race to officially use the death of Bhutto as a political tool...Congratulations, Barack. Can HRC be far behind?http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3894018
Edited to add link and say, I knew it wouldn't be long!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. It is interesting that Obama has no more control over the flapping jaws...
of his Obama Surrogates than any other candidate.

This was a time when statements(non-political)were mandated from the principals. The rest of the surrogates should have had the good taste to refer the press to their principals.

And yes, the Obama surrogate's statement amounted to a political attack on Hillary--who made her statement as she should have done.

Experience and class always wins in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Everything Axelrod said was correct... the only flapping jaws belong to Hillaryworld's minions
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Um his middle name is not Hussein, it's Neo, cause he's THE ONE. That would be BNO...

BARACK NEO OBAMA



http://xs222.xs.to/xs222/07490/TheOne!.gif



Get it right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC