Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Candidates: Bhutto killing underscores need for tested leaders

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:57 PM
Original message
Candidates: Bhutto killing underscores need for tested leaders
We can argue about who's politicizing these events, but in a few day's time that will be forgotten. It's clear that most of the top candidates and the media have settled on their meme as the title shows.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/politics/ny-uscands1228,0,4618726.story
Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton seized on news of Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto's assassination Thursday, as both used it to underscore a key campaign pitch -- that the United States needs a strong, tested leader to face a dangerous world.


Both Giuilani and Clinton have seen their political fortunes wane during recent weeks of relative stability in the world – and both stand to benefit if Bhutto's assassination refocuses voters on terrorism in these final days before voting begins in Iowa and New Hampshire.


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jjgcYh_MIVdzPCsopJlMH1ejzR9wD8TPUGSG3
Clinton:
"it certainly raises the stakes high for what we expect from our next president. I know from a lifetime of working to make change.

Giuliani:
"Her death is a reminder that terrorism anywhere — whether in New York, London, Tel-Aviv or Rawalpindi — is an enemy of freedom. We must redouble our efforts to win the terrorists' war on us."

McCain:
the death of Bhutto "underscores yet again the grave dangers we face in the world today and particularly in countries like Pakistan..."


It's clear that they're following the strategy followed by Bush in 2004. Raise fears of terrorism and tell people that the stakes are too high for them to risk handing power over to someone new who isn't tested and experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think you have to do more than just take the test
You have to pass it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, that will be the counterargument
Unfortunately, since the grading of the test is so subjective, it's hard to say how it will turn out in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC