|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
JackORoses
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:33 PM Original message |
By pushing the Axelrod statement, are Hillarites unwittingly drawing attention to her IWR vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
1. Disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. By "you people" do you mean us "Obama gangbangers"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:10 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Spoken like a true Bill Shaheen Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:30 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Who is this Bill Shaheen you keep speaking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. lol! You are so very disingenuous. Check the DU archives to see your defense of him two weeks ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:46 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Okay, I know who Shaheen is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:54 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Uh huh... funny how you forget between evening threads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:12 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Find a post of mine defending this Shaheen guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Sorry, I'm not your gopher. Unlike you, I have a very good memory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:20 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. Well your memory is not very good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:22 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Deleted message |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:35 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Keep saying that. It doesn't make it true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:43 AM Response to Reply #36 |
49. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 08:39 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Deleted message |
bluewisdom
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 08:15 AM Response to Reply #36 |
51. Obama support of President Bush's right-wing judges.A BIG Lieberman supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #35 |
61. My memory is just fine. Anyone checking the DU archives can see what I'm talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. hillary's IWR vote? The first in a long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. nobody gave a shit about the IWR in the 2004 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
39. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
41. Are you forgetting the Grand Canyon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #41 |
55. It didn't hurt him in the primary, and the OP is talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:27 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. If Gephardt's people hadn't gone to JK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
44. I guess you forgot about 2006 when the Dems took control because of the War |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
56. did they take control solely because of the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:30 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. are you kidding me? the War was 'the' issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. there for a split second I was under the impression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
4. Obama would have just skipped the vote or voted "present" at best... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Anytime anyone brings up the "present" vote due to ignorance of senatorial legislative process... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. Here's the NYT story - Hillary's IWR misjudgment front and center |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. and yet he gives Obama a free pass for all of his votes for the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Cleaning up "your girl's" mess is not easy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I notice you never respond to the facts,just make smart ass remarks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. One who supposedly knew "the facts" wouldn't have made those silly arguments in the first place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Obama has been all over the place in his "speaking out" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:00 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Uh huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Talk about revisionist history ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Voila. It's not about experience...it's about judgment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
46. do you ever get tired of making this same post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. experience is rendered moot when it is accompanied by poor judgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. I agree with this point of view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElizabethDC
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
16. The issue is brought up all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. I welcome the Hillary campaign to bring it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiley
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
21. Pretty sure that more than just Clinton supporters are trashing Axelrod |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Really? Seems like 99% of the whining outrage on this thread are from Hillaryworlders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. There you go again. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:19 AM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I knew you were a Reagan Democrat before you became a Bill Shaheen Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:37 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. If I'm a Shaheen Democrat then you're a McClurkin Democrat. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 08:52 AM Response to Reply #33 |
54. LOL! love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:15 AM Response to Reply #24 |
42. It's always more than Hillary supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiley
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:53 AM Response to Reply #24 |
68. Anger and Bitterness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
25. Just for one friggin' day - stop it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Why haven't you said that on any of the "Obama said Hillary killed Bhutto " threads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #29 |
40. In view of today's events - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
34. Listen, the war is fucked up, but the guys' statement was assholish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fried Bread
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
43. Axelrod's statement was AWESOME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:37 AM Response to Original message |
45. OK, I give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annie1
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:49 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. After Bhutto's assassination that link is what Obama's top stategist said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
48. What's cool is that now--when they kvetch about Hillary's IWR vote--we'll think about Axelrodgate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:54 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Actually reading msm on Axelrod statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
64. actually Axelrod is not what people will remember, it is Hill's IWR vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
53. noone accused Penn of being smart. especially with this move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BenDavid
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
57. no, just shows the stupidity of obama trying any damn thing to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:45 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. you still do not attempt to defend Hillary's actions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Maybe he's smart enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
60. yes they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
63. None of this matters to typical voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:53 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. exactly, the average voter doesn't care about Axelrod, but the IWR on the other hand.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tactical Progressive
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
69. Hillary's IWR vote was the correct one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lurking Dem
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 11:55 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. The "correct" one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC