Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Iowa Poll: Obama 29%, Edwards 29%, Clinton 28%, Its not gonna get any closer than this folks!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:28 PM
Original message
New Iowa Poll: Obama 29%, Edwards 29%, Clinton 28%, Its not gonna get any closer than this folks!
Obama has dropped four points since the last poll, while Clinton and Edwards has both gone up 4-5 points. Looks like this race is too close to call going into the caucus (just as we expected)

DES MOINES -- A new Iowa caucus poll from Lee Enterprises newspapers shows the Democratic race is a virtual three-way tie, with John Edwards rising to tie Barack Obama for the lead and Hillary Clinton rising to just one point behind.

On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee remains in the lead with a 7-point edge over Mitt Romney.

The poll, conducted with 500 likely caucus goers from each party on Dec. 26 and 27, showed Edwards and Obama tied with 29 percent to lead Democrats, followed by Clinton with 28 percent. Bill Richardson was fourth with 7 percent. Joe Biden was fifth with 3 percent. Chris Dodd and Dennis Kucinich both had 1 percent and 2 percent were undecided.

For Republicans, Huckabee leads with 34 percent, followed by Romney with 27 percent. Fred Thompson is a distant third with 11 percent, followed by a three-way tie for fourth between Rudy Giuliani, John McCain and Ron Paul, with 8 points each. Duncan Hunter had 1 percent and 3 percent were undecided.

The poll, which has a margin or error of plus or minus 4.5 percent, was commissioned by Lee Enterprises and conducted by Maryland-based Research 2000.

There is plenty of room for shifts in the final days before the Jan. 3 caucuses, with 19 percent of Democrats and 31 percent of Republicans saying they are likely or very likely to change their minds.

http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/12/28/news/latest_news/37d0c625226b8b8a862573bf005d9dff.txt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. More good numbers for JRE, they should be happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. It couldn't be any closer.
There's really no way to predict the outcome. (not that that has stopped me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've been saying all along that I couldn't predict the outcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I think when the Des Moines Register releases its polls the day before, there will be an indication.
Even if it's just minimal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I agree, apparently they are considered most accurate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. They predicted the '04 finish in eerily fashion.
I was a Dean supporter back then and recall nervously refreshing their front page to get the numbers, then they were leaked and I saw Dean was 3rd, behind Edwards and the eventual winner, Kerry. Sure enough, that's how they finished.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-01-18-iowa-poll_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's ALWAYS been too close to call
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 01:39 PM by rocknation
It's been Hillary and the corporate media who have been trying to convince us otherwise!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Then, why has Hillary received more negative publicity
than any other candidate?

I haven't made up my mine who I'll vote for, but I get tired of fact-less statements against any candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd just remind people of Pollster.com's analysis of polling trends around Holidays and
this poll was done on December 26th and 27th.

http://www.pollster.com/blogs/polling_on_the_dark_side_of_th.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thats all very true, and I think the polling problems help Obama
With his support trending younger, I think they have a better chance of being out of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And any Iowa poll taken before the Caucus date still falls in holiday season
None of them can be relied on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Look out for the DM Register poll, 'cause I think that will be the most accurate.
They called it in 2004 and I think they'll call it this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's not forget to factor in second choice candidate numbers
which from what I understand could put Edwards in the lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's what I heard! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm not sure if this poll takes into account second choice numbers
So you cant just assume off of what another poll may say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I wrote to the column and the response back
was that the second choice numbers were not included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Edwards is going to win. He just has the strongest support. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC