Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloomberg Buys "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" Ads In Iowa, New Hampshire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:08 AM
Original message
Bloomberg Buys "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" Ads In Iowa, New Hampshire
Media Bistro: Bloomberg Buys Ads In Iowa, New Hampshire

The full-page advertisement (below) just appeared in the Des Monies Register and the New Hampshire Union Leader. It appears to have been funded by a non-profit called Mayors Against Illegal Guns. Except... Mayors Against Illegal Guns was founded by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is the organization's primary source of funding....

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/ (Scroll down.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. The only silver lining if Hillary wins the nomination...
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 01:11 AM by Wolsh
Is Bloomberg will run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. In which case he will be relegated to the irrelevance of Ralph Nader.
Who is also trying to blackmail Democrats with the threat of a spoiler candidacy if his almighty self is displeased with our majority choice.

Golly, hope all the egotistical little shits run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bloomberg is no Nader
Bloomberg would be in it to win, and have a billion dollars to put where his mouth is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. No, I don't see him as Nader. He's more mainstream than that.
Not sure he can win, but he'd pull in more votes than Perot, I'll bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here are the 16 questions on the survey.


1. Tiahrt Amendment: In 2004, Congress put in place an appropriations restriction that limits access by local law enforcement, cities, and states to crime gun trace data, which police chiefs say is critical for catching criminals, illegal traffickers, and dealers who break the law. For example, according to ATF, 57% of guns recovered in crimes originate from just 1.2% of gun dealers – yet the Tiahrt Amendment has prevented cities and states from identifying these dealers. Mayors from across the country, 10 national police organizations and 22 state and regional police groups have called on Congress to repeal the Tiahrt Amendment restrictions. As president, would you include the Tiahrt Amendment crime gun trace data restrictions in your budgets for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF)?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

2. National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Records: Federal law currently prohibits persons determined to be mentally unstable from purchasing or possessing firearms. As you may know, under this existing prohibition Seung-Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter, was legally prohibited from buying guns. Unfortunately, millions of mental health records are currently missing from the federal NICS background check database. According to the Department of Justice and the nonpartisan congressional Office of Technology Assessment indicate that less than 15% of the “mentally defective” people who should be prevented from having guns under federal law are included in the NICS database. Do you support legislation that seeks to ensure that states provide all mental health and other records of persons already prohibited from buying guns to the federal NICS background check database?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

3. Microstamping: In September 2007, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation to require that all new models of guns manufactured or sold in California include “microstamping” technology starting in 2010. This California legislation was endorsed by the California Police Chiefs’ Association, Police Officers Research Association of California, Los Angeles County Police Chiefs' Association, Los Angeles Police Protective League, Orange County Chiefs' and Sheriffs’ Association, and 65 individual California police chiefs and sheriffs. Firearms microstamping is a technology that leaves microscopic identifications on shell casings at crime scenes. Do you support legislation that would require new firearms sold in the United States to include microstamping technology?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

TOUGHENING PUNISHMENT
4. Illegal Traffickers: Do you support increasing the maximum penalty for illegal gun trafficking crimes from 10 years to 20 years ?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

5. Illegal Possession: Do you support increasing the maximum penalty for illegal firearms possession from 10 years to 15 years ?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):
ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL LAW

6. “Terror Gap”: Six years after 9/11, the federal government lacks the authority to prevent gun sales to suspects on terror watch lists. A 2005 GAO study found that 47 suspected terrorists were able to purchase guns from dealers in just a nine-month period because of this “Terror Gap” in federal laws. Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Representative Peter King (R-NY) have introduced the “Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act” (S.1237 and H.R.2074) to give the Department of Justice the authority to stop gun sales to terror suspects. The Bush Administration and the Department of Justice have endorsed S.1237 and H.R.2074. As president, would you support passage of legislation to close this Terror Gap in federal laws?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

7. Sex Offenders: Every state maintains registries of convicted sex offenders. Right now, under federal law, felony sex offenders are prohibited from purchasing firearms but there are no restrictions on the hundreds of thousands of convicted misdemeanor sex offenders’ ability to purchase firearms. Because of the practical difficulties of prosecuting sex crime cases, many defendants are permitted to plead guilty to lesser misdemeanor sex offenses despite the severity of their actual conduct for reasons unrelated to the merits of the case, such as sparing a child from having to testify against a relative or having to testify at all. Therefore, many defendants convicted of a misdemeanor sex offense may pose an equal danger as those convicted of a felony offense. Do you support legislation to bar all convicted sex offenders from purchasing and possessing firearms?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

8. “Gun Show Loophole”: Currently, individuals are able to sell multiple guns as so-called “private sellers” without conducting background checks on the buyers. This practice is often associated with gun shows. Would you support legislation that would require background checks on these types of sales?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

9. Secure Identification for Gun Purchases: In 2013, the federal “Real ID Act” will go into full effect. In order to get into a federal building or to get on a commercial airplane, all persons will have to show secure identification that is compliant with the Real ID Act. However, unless the law is amended, people would not need to show Real ID-compliant identification to buy guns. Requiring gun purchasers to show Real ID-compliant identification could help prevent sales to persons already prohibited from buying firearms, including felons (who might be able to more easily fake non-compliant IDs) and undocumented aliens (who, unless INS has flagged them individually in the background check system, can now buy guns by misrepresenting their status on the background check form). Do you support a change in federal law to require that gun purchasers show Real ID-compliant identification by 2013?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

STRENGTHENING ATF ENFORCEMENT
10. Dealer Inventory Sell-offs: Right now, all gun dealers are required to do background checks, but federal law allows dealers who lose their licenses to sell off their entire inventory as so-called “private sellers” without doing any checks at all. These inventory sell-offs reward instead of punish gun dealers who break the law. Do you believe that gun dealers whose licenses have been revoked for selling guns illegally should be allowed to continue selling guns in their inventory without doing background checks?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

11. Dealer Inventory Controls: In 2005, during inspections of less than 5% of licensed gun dealers, ATF found that more than 12,000 guns had disappeared from dealer inventories. Right now, these inventory discrepancies typically come to light only during ATF inspections. Do you support a requirement that gun dealers conduct an inventory at least once per year and report any missing guns to ATF?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

12. ATF Resources: On average, according to ATF, it inspects a dealer only once every 17 years. ATF has recently announced a goal of inspecting dealers at least once every three years. As president, would you support an increase in ATF’s inspection budget to allow it to meet this goal by 2010?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

13. Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) Employee Background Checks: Federal law prohibits felons, drug addicts, the mentally ill, and other prohibited persons, from purchasing, possessing, or transferring firearms. However, existing federal law does not require gun dealers to perform background checks to determine whether or not an employee involved in gun sales is a felon or other prohibited person. Do you think that licensed gun dealers should be required to perform background checks on all employees who handle firearms to identify current or prospective employees who may be prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms themselves?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

MILITARY-STYLE ASSAULT WEAPONS
14. Recent local studies suggest that high-powered military weapons are being used more frequently by criminals since the ban on these weapons expired in 2004. For example, in Miami these weapons were used in only 4 fatal shootings in 2004, the year the ban expired. By 2006, these weapons were used to murder 15 people in Miami. Moreover, with fatal shootings of police officers up 40% so far this year, some law enforcement organizations have expressed concern about criminals armed with military-grade weapons. President Bush supports reinstatement of the assault weapons ban. Do you support legislation to prohibit the sale of assault weapons?
Yes.
No.
Comments (optional):

LOCAL POLICE FUNDING AND RISING VIOLENT CRIME
15. COPS Funding: A 2005 GAO report estimated that the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) program had contributed to a 1.3% decline in the overall crime rate and a 2.5%t drop in violent crime from 1993 to 2000. Despite these apparent successes, COPS funding has been substantially curtailed in recent years. What is your opinion of the COPS program and what do you believe is the appropriate funding level for that program?
Comments:

16. Fighting Violent Crime: In the last year, violent crime is up 1.9% across the country. As president, what measures would you take to stem the rising tide of violent crime across the country, which so many mayors believe is a critical national priority?
Comments:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks, aikoaiko! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. If I were running for President.
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 01:57 AM by aikoaiko

1. Yes. It seems reasonable to know where guns that get used in crimes originate, but that in itself does not mean the gun dealers were at fault.

2. Yes, The NICS database should be complete and well funded.

3. I don't know. Criminals would simply use brass catchers or revolvers so that microstamped cartridges weren't strewn about crime scenes. Plus, its nearly impossible to keep track of cartridges at shooting ranges and they could be used to implicate innocent people.

4. Yes, I support tougher penalties for illegal traffikers, but I'd also like to see straw purchases to people otherwise NOT prohibited from purchasing a firearm decriminalized.

5. Yes, I support longer sentences for illegal possession of firearms.

6. No. The terror watch list is a strange creation and very fallible. If we have intelligence that a terrorist is in the country, that terrorist should be hauled off to gitmo.

7. Tough one, but no. Felonies should be the cutoff. Moreover, I wish it restrictions were limited to violent felons.

8. No. The gunshow loophole is bullshit. Yes, private sales happen at gunshows, but they also happen at restaurants, grocery store parking lots, gas station parking lots, and kitchen tables (all places I've done so). Bloomberg should be honest and just say he wants to end private sales that don't require background checks.

9. Yes, I'm unhappy about national IDs, but if they are a reality then they will be useful for FFL gun sales.

10. No, only because its a conundrum of sorts. If a gun dealer loses the FFL, then they are just a private citizen again with stuff to sell. Private folks have no access to NICS databases.

11. Yes. Gun dealers should keep track of their inventory and report lost/stolen weapons on some kind of regular basis. It could be 1 year or 2 or 3, I don't care.

12. Yes. The ATF should have a budget to do their job and conduct inspections

13. OK. I can live with the background checks on sellers of guns.

14. Easy no. Banning firearms is unconstitutional, IMHO.

15. Yes, I support increased funding for Community Policing.

16. Its the economy stupid.

eta: typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC