Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby Iowa Poll: Clinton 36% Obama 33% Edwards 31%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:43 PM
Original message
Zogby Iowa Poll: Clinton 36% Obama 33% Edwards 31%
These are the most important poll numbers to watch. What happens when the most likely unviable candidates are distributed among the top 3. Zogby has a completely different result than MSNBC.

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1406

"Importantly, if you eliminate the potentially 'unviable' candidates and redistribute their supporters' second choices, the result is: Clinton 35.8%, Obama 33.4%, Edwards 30.8%."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I still think Edwards will win because of his organization.
Regardless, NH will be all Obama.

It'll be fun to watch! :popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. If you are looking strictly on organization muscle
You have to give the edge to Hillary. She has twice as much paid staff as Edwards and hundreds of more staff from the 527's supporting her. She also has legendary democratic operative Teresa Vilmain running her show.

Just some more FYI about Teresa. Check out this article.

She was responsible for winning Wisconsin for Gore and Kerry in 2000 and 2004, both by less than 1%. She also organized the 80,000 person Bruce Springsteen bash for Kerry the weekend before the election.

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=700397


In Wisconsin, Vilmain has helped elect Sen. Herb Kohl and Gov. Jim Doyle, to name just two. She ran the state for former President Clinton's 1996 campaign and Al Gore's 2000 campaign, and she lent a late hand in 2004 for John Kerry. All three were Democratic victories, the last two by less than a percentage point. Wisconsin was the closest state in America in 2004.
...
Vilmain's job in 2004 included brokering the debate schedule among the Democratic contenders, and after Kerry emerged as the nominee, dispatching organizers to the battlegrounds.

Vilmain ended the campaign in ultra-competitive Wisconsin. She helped organize perhaps the biggest campaign event in the state's modern history, a Bruce Springsteen appearance that drew 80,000-plus people to the capital. When members of the crowd were asked to take out their phones to conduct the "world's biggest phone bank operation," they shut down the cell towers within 15 minutes.

GOP consultant Bill McCoshen of Madison said that "people on the Republican side that do this for a living know who the competition is," and "she's the best."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. We'll see.
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 07:59 PM by calteacherguy
Edwards also has the most committed supporters in every poll I've seen, and the strongest 2nd choice support.

No worries though Herman, after all your girl doesn't need to win little 'ol Iowa, right?

Will be fun to watch. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's too soon for poll numbers to mean anything at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Too Soon
The caucus is Thursday...

I doubt you can do an accurate poll on New Years Eve Day Or New Years Day... That leaves Wed-the first work day of the New Year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. It Would Be Interesting To See If Zogby Or Mason-Dixon Is Right...
In 04 Zogby was the most accurate in IA not DMR as some have suggested:

http://www.pollster.com/blogs/how_accurate_were_the_iowa_pol.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. The polls during the holiday week are skewed....
Many folks are gone, traveling. There is a demographic: travelers are younger, and more educated. These groups will be under-represented in this week's polls.

Obama does much better among young and better educated demographics. So it would follow that it is likely that Obama's numbers are lower in this week's polls than what is true for the entire population.

So, given the above poll results, Obama is looking good. I also think Edwards' organization and momentum is going to help him.

Biden could very well surprise us as well.

I predict Hillary 4th, Biden 3rd, Obama and Edwards vying for 1st with the edge to Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Pollsters Weight Their Results To The Census
In other words all groups will be represented in the polls in numbers representative to their numbers in the actual population which is being measured...If African Americans represent 12% of the population they should represent 12% of the poll...If 6% of Americans have post graduate degrees they should represent 6% of the poll, so on and so fourth...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10.  No, during the holiday period, no polling company even bothers to do polls!
They know it is unreliable.

But here we have to rely on the last week of polling which happens to be in the time period when polls are least reliable.

Sorry, but this was pointed out in an excellent article in pollster.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have taken that poll for several years
and have taken one this year, knowing fully well for Edwards , yet they haven't ask that question this year, they ask me who I voted for in the last election, I am reasonably sure not positive, that they h aven't ask me this year who I will vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC