Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are there cases in some states where ole-time Dems who always vote Republican can fuck up a Primary?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:21 PM
Original message
Are there cases in some states where ole-time Dems who always vote Republican can fuck up a Primary?
For instance, I've heard that in some states, especially in some of the redder states, there are still huge numbers of older voters who are registered as Democrats, but they have been voting Republican for the last couple decades or more.

So, if the primary is a closed primary, where voters can only vote in the primary of the party that they're registered in, can there be enough of these registered "Democrats" (really Republicans now) that can screw up the results of a Democratic Primary in that state? And if so, is this why they refuse to register as Republicans? Or are they just ole-time Democrats who used to vote Democrat when they were young but never bothered re-registering as Repukes in later years just because they didn't want to bother? Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think theoretically it could happen.
But I honestly don't think many former dem-current repub voters are that malicious that they'd try to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. people who are registered for one party but consistently vote for another rarely
vote in any primaries, and if they would their influence would be negligible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. That's Confusing
How can they be eligible to vote in the general if they haven't voted in the primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. no one has to vote in a primary to vote in a general election.
And people who vote in a primary range from only around one-tenth to one-third of the people who vote in the general, depending on other circumstances.

But you don't have to vote in the primary to vote in the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Err you think hordes of elderly folks are trying to rig the Dem primaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't understimate we elderly folks---we are more devious
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 09:37 PM by Fed_Up_Grammy
than you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Wait until Hillary actually sews this whole thing up in early February -
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 09:41 PM by smalll
we'll see a LOT more threads like this one. Maybe the OP here is just being proactive. :shrug: Heaven help us if she wins Iowa. I want her to win, but DU really needs at least a few weeks to get used to it. A Hill win in Iowa might be just too much, too soon.

If she DOES win Iowa, I exepect to hear about the supermagnets. Supermagnets are the perfect way to steal a caucus. Everyone has belt buckles. Or at least just about everyone in Iowa in the winter does, I should expect. Nice big fat ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. can she sew a couple of buttons on my shirts?
hell i `ll vote for her if she does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. for a vote, she will learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. well I am probably elderly by your standards
and the older I get, the more I see that my best interests lie with the democratic party. I hope you don't think us old farts are unworthy of belonging to your party, dear child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Perhaps I should have made it clear that I thought the idea was rediculous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. IOW, you don't know the answer to an honest question, so you answer just to hear yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. What?
I honestly have no idea what you are talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. why of course we are!
you know we are a bit daft in the head....:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Give it a rest, there is no conspiracy if your girl loses. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I don't need any extra rest, teacher. OTOH, you seem to be losing tons of sleep lately
judging by all your threads showing you're worried to death over the Iowa thing and so uptight that you're already doing threads on third-party candidates you're gonna vote for if your idol loses.

Oh, I see one of your threads about voting third party already got locked. You naughty naughty teacher, you. lol

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3911248&mesg_id=3911248


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. when i vote in a primary i have to declare a party
it`s sucked because there was a republican that was worth voting for but i could`t in the primary just the general election. this primary is a bit more complicated because of the special election in the illinois 14th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. I checked for your state & I noticed it's not listed as open or closed, but "other"
It said something like you must vote in the same primary as the last primary vote, but that it's "loosely enforced".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wouldn't ole-time Dems who "always" vote Republican be considered Republicans?
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 09:46 PM by no name no slogan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. i`m old and you are confusing me
i`m going to go lay down and take a nap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Okay, bear with me
If a person's political party affiliation is determined by what party s/he votes for in an election, wouldn't a person who "always" votes Republican be considered a Republican?

Aw, screw it. I'm going to go find that video footage of Jimmy Carter thwacking that killer bunny rabbit that attacked his canoe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Not in states like Texas
Here we don't have to register with any party, we just vote in one of the party primaries. The only sticking point comes if there is a runoff in the repub primary- if you voted in the Dem primary you can't vote in the repub runoff, even if there is no Dem runoff. Or vice versa of course.

This leads to a great deal of cross party voting, though, at least in areas of the state where one party control exists at the local level. For example, SE Texas is Dem controlled locally, thus most people vote in the Dem primary since that usually decides county and regional races. However, that doesn't mean that those same people then vote straight Dem in November. There have actually been coordinated campaigns by the repubs in the past to attempt to pick the weaker of the Dems in the primary to help the repub in the general. The repubs in Texas did this in the 90s in our Dem primary between Mattox and Fisher- Fisher won because of the likely crossover vote and was then slaughtered by Kay My Daddy Used to Say Hutchison.


But I would imagine that any repub interfernce in the Dem primaries of 08 would be in favor of Clinton, not against- something I don't think the OP would like to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Here in Kansas we have many
Democrats who are registered as Republicans specifically to vote in the primaries, because it's the Republican primaries that matter most in this state. I've spent years trying to convince those Democrats that they are wrong to do so, that their registration as Republicans further weakens the Democratic Party, and that they should be working actively for Democrats from the very beginning.

Keep in mind that there are states in which you don't register a party preference, although presumably you can only vote in one party's primary, and undoubtedly voters in those states sometimes vote in the Democratic primary and sometimes in the Republican one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Thank you, and also to the other couple of posters way upthread for helping clear it up for me
Yours is the kind of post that people can learn something interesting from, as opposed to the goofy ones who are trying to make this thread about Hillary in the dorkiest of fashion.

Thanks! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkoleptic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. I used to be register as a repug in order to cast a primary ballot for..
whomever seemed the most clueless and out of touch.
Blew up in my face on * and I've since realized that irony abounds in the repug political process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thank you, too. That's exactly one of the things I was wondering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynthia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. In Minnesota, you don't "register" as a member of any party
but when it comes time to vote in a primary, you get one ballot or the other, so "cross-over" voting is possible. I don't think it makes much of a difference in the big contests. In a smaller election (congress or state legislature) it might have an impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. So that would be an open primary, right?
where you can vote in whichever primary you choose, but only one primary, not both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynthia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Right,
you can't vote for more than one party in the primary, so you are committing to that party for the few minutes to cast your ballot. After that, you can align yourself with whatever party you want. And in the general, you can choose from all the parties anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC