Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary supporters. Explain why your candidate is running as if she was VP of the US

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:36 AM
Original message
Hillary supporters. Explain why your candidate is running as if she was VP of the US
with her husband and had more power than Al Gore.

and why are all of you buying it?

If she gets the nod, will her vp just be a figurehead and bill be the true vp?

Does anyone else find that dynamic to be a slap in the face to our system of government and a bit disquieting?

I am getting more and more distressed with the Clinton scenario every day!

I am hoping for a victory by either Edwards of Obama and even Biden if he can pull it out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess you slept through
the Clinton Presidency then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. No, I didn't.... I believe you might have been. Al Gore was his VP if I recall...
That fact that you believe what you're saying is troubling. We elect a president and vice president. They are the decision makers, not their wives. I respect that Mrs. Clinton wanted to make a mark by proposing health care, but for her to run on a falsehood, that she helped run the country, is really over the top and doesn't speak well for our democracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. How incredibly predictable a response.
You set up a false premise, and then surprise surprise --it 'proves' your conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. I gather you thought Eleanor Roosevelt was just an interfering busy body. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because that equals "experience" or "change" or whatever
position she is stressing this week. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. You're "distressed "? Boo Hoo ..take a chill pill
Personally I love team work. Great teams are winners

Check out my favorite teams and ask them all about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Losers all of them LMAO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Do tell which Florida teams were winners this year? Marlins, D Rays, Dolphins?
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 11:47 AM by durrrty libby
:dunce: :dunce: :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaiilonfong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. You ALWAYS have such nice things to say
I have alerted you!
Happy New Year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Because it's all about winning, and feeling good and feeling powerful
Bullshit Fake Tribalism over real Change and the Business Of We The People.

Being Cool and Part of The Crowd instead of doing what's right.

What a great country this is becoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. even if you win, you lose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. There you go again Windy
breaking-wind out your back-door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Wow, what a reasoned, mature response. I'm impressed.
And unfortunately, most hillary die hards have your same brand of mental acuity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. They are truly becoming like bullies in a sandbox
But I wonder why we never see them staunchly defend her Record?

Because they can't.

It's like being cornered by an obnoxious drunk at a Frat Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. This seems to have been the plan since Bill was in office.
And, yes, I find it offensive. Dynasties tend to be bad for democracy. We know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. cool tactic don't cha think.!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. To subvert the democratic process by attempting to install and king and queen?
Hardly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Who's trying to subvert the democratic process?
We're still having these things called elections, ya know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Yes, for sale to the highest bidder.
Actually, a quick look at the last 40 years of history will prove that the Democratic party did better without Presidential primaries. When we picked our candidates at the convention, they usually got elected. And we kept huge majorities in Congress.

Now the entire system is deliberately front loaded to benefit the candidate with the most corporate money. And we all know who that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. "king and queen" Typical overblown Obama Drama. All hot air and
no substance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. She's running an incumbent's campaign because Mark Penn told her that was the way for her to win. No
mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bellasgrams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Incumbent's race? That's a new one for me.
What is she doing to doing to warrant this title? Or did you just get tired of all the old stuff they've piled on over the years. Frankly a few more years of Bill Clinton's economy and stability sounds good to me. I'm sure if she gets in they will discuss issues just as they did when Bill was in. Actually after 8 yrs of W it will take many, many yrs to recover, regardless of who gets in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. I wish I could take credit, but it's not my original analysis. Here are some sources:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. Obama supporters
explain why Obama is EVEN RUNNING FOR THE CHANCE TO BE PRESIDENT. He is even less qualified than the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. My answer is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. seriously Windy--have you not been bombarded with all of the experience
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 11:51 AM by Evergreen Emerald
Clinton received while in the White HOuse? I know you read DU. It makes me wonder if you are just pretending, or if you are just picking a fight.

Madaline Albright outlined the extensive experience Clinton received at the White House with the over 80 trips as Ambassader to the US in one form or another visiting heads of states of those 80 countries, negotiating, informing, speaking. Her foreign relations experience is vast.

Further, her time in the white house as advisor to the president, gives her a unique perspective. Did she overstep her bounds? Perhaps. The President can use any advisor he trusts. And he said he used her. She did not overstep her bounds in attending security meetings, but that does not diminish the experience she did have.

As a Senator she has also had extensive experience, that has been outlined on DU numerous times.


Clinton's vast and unique experience coupled with her strenght and intelligence, makes her the best candidate for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. There are posters who deliberately ignore any evidence
that doesn't fit the picture they're trying to paint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. and based on her non-response, I suspect you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. Why should anyone explain anything to do you?
You're not voting for her no matter what. Get a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Most president's wives, first ladies if you please, did the sort of things...
that are expected of officers wives in government service.

Contrast Hillary's activities during Bill's presidency with the activities of Laura or Barbara.

A different time, the last activist first lady was Eleanor Roosevelt.

And, nothing between Eleanor and Hillary.

Most first ladies are meant to be seen and not heard. Laura has surfaced from time to time but only in non-confrontational activities. The most confrontational activity Laura has been involved in has been to move from the white house into a hotel from time to time when Shrub falls off the wagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. For all we know, she did Bill Clinton's job for him
It's very possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC