Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bookmark this: Final Iowa results; Obama 38% Edwards 33%, Clinton 29%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:50 PM
Original message
Bookmark this: Final Iowa results; Obama 38% Edwards 33%, Clinton 29%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
forsberg Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. hate to burst your bubble
But Obama is coming in 3rd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Penn, is that you? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. ROFL !
I needed that ... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. No one will choose Hill for their second choice so Hill comes in 3rd. a distant
3rd at that.... imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
35. Wow
Great pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordJFT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. hahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's bold, man! Hopefully you're right, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. No percents for any second tier? Harsh!
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 12:54 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I don't think any are going to be viable in any precinct given where the top 3 are currently polling
Maybe someone gett to 15% in a few locations, but there are 1,700+ preincts. Statewide this translates into maybe 1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. That doesn't sound realistic to me.
I think it's more likely to be Edwards at 36%, Clinton at 32% and Obama at 29%. I do agree, sadly, that none of the 2nd tier will reach 15%. I hope I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They don't need to reach 15% state-wide
There will be some delegates apportioned to a second tier.

(But I agree that no second tier will reach 15% state-wide.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Actually, I think Biden has a shot
I just think the dynamics of the caucus make it possible for Biden to get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The second tier doesn't have to make 15% statewide
they have to make 15% at the precinct level which they will do at many precincts.

AT the bare minimum, the second tier will get 10-12% possible as high as 20%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. I'm confused about Edwards
I understand why people would support him and why he should do well. My sense is that he will not win. I'm not sure if he's going to be 2nd or 3rd. I think Hillary is going to be pushed to third because of the caucus rules which means Edwards is 2nd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
40. I bet you never felt happier to be wrong
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. he he he he he he this don't even deserve a ha ha ha it is so
bullshitty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't know if Obama wins by that margin...
but I still think he's going to win. If he doesn't win, I think he comes in a close 2nd. I don't know why people on this site have written him off all of a sudden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yeah
Every poll I've seen has the race at a virtual three-way tie. It's going to come down to organization, and I think people are greatly underestimating his organization in the state.

I guess we'll find out in a couple days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. ha ha!!! (think nelson from the Simpsons)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. I too think Obama will win or come in a close second...
Don't see it happening by those margins, tho...


Would love to be wrong. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. good luck
hope you didn't put any money on those numbers. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. kick for diversity of opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. DMR Predicting 40% of Dem caucusgoers will be independents
That is double the usual number.

DES MOINES, Iowa — As Thursday’s caucuses approach, political insiders say the outcome is more in doubt than perhaps ever before. That’s partly because neither party has a front-runner — and also because Iowa polling has provided as many questions as answers.

Those uncertainties have persisted into the campaign’s final hours in the wake of Monday’s release of the Des Moines Register poll.

The poll remains the most respected of Iowa surveys, in part because it accurately predicted the 2004 result.

But its conclusion that former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama (D) hold clear leads not only contrasted with the narrow margins of other polls but also was based on two stunning findings: record high turnout by independents and a strong reliance on first-time caucus-goers.
Obama’s internal polling also shows him ahead, according to a senior adviser in the campaign, but Clinton’s chief strategist, Mark Penn, challenged the Register’s results outright.

Most alarming, in the view of Hillary Rodham Clinton's camp, is the Register’s finding that four in 10 Democratic caucus-goers will be independents.

The New York senator still leads among Democrats and would win, Penn pointed out, if the 2008 independent turnout comes in at a level closer to that of previous caucuses.

In 2004, only 19 percent of Democratic caucus-goers were independents. In 2000, the figure was 17 percent, according to a CNN entrance poll. If the Register is right, 2008 would mark an historic doubling of independents participating in the Democratic contest.

The Register’s independent expectation is also roughly 10 percent larger than that of other polls, like those run by John Zogby for Reuters. Zogby’s poll, released Wednesday, finds a statistical tie between Huckabee and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, as well as among the three leading Democrats.

But the Register poll remains the gold standard in terms of its accuracy.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/7681.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. Uh, that adds up to 100% and there are several other candidates that will have at least 1%. Biden...
...could potentially be double digits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not the way the caucus system works.
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 08:39 AM by Perky
You have to meet 15% at a single caucus site or you are not viable. Biden or Richardons have to get 15% in enough sites to get on the board in the state totals.
A scond tier candidate has to get about 20% in about 20% of the sitesto even get to 1% state wide.


it sux...but those are the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Obama Will Not Come In First. Hillary or Barack Will Take Second
It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. apparnently it was not that simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. That's for individual precincts, not state-wide. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. I hate to say I told you so,
Nah I really do not hate it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
25. very good, very close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. Very good prediction! Congrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. That's scary-close...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. I did not think Richardson would get to the viability threshold in enough
preincts to get to the two percent statewide. That actually means he god 15% in about 15% of the precincts.

I have to look at those precincts to see how Edwards faired but It was damn close otherwise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. You need a show on cable!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #28
41. ROFL
Thanks.....


How are things looking to ou in New Hampshire the day after. What are the Headlines in the Union-leader and the Monitor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kosmo Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. Second place baby. Yeah!
From Iowa I'll take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
30. Nice job
Now tell us who'll win NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. New Hampshire prediction
I will wager that the next NH poll will show a bump of 15% for Obama and a small erosion of supportfor Hillary.

Given how Independents and women broke in NH and given that NH is an open primary, Obama will win NH with 45to 47% of the vote.

Richardon will drop out.

It is difficult to see how Hillary wins South Carolina if Obama Steamrolls New Hampshire.

Her first competitve win is going to have to wait until Super Tuesday. That is a tough hand to play. Even harder for Edwards given how he is polling in NH and SC.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. You rock, Perky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Nice, can't disagree with that
I'll be working to make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Good luck in NH
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. you know, my friend predicted Obama-Edwards-Clinton in that order tonight
and says that Obama wins sizably in NH too..we'll see if you're right in five days.lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
39. Well done!
The Perky poll prevails!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC