|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 04:55 PM Original message |
Edwards: "I Believe That NAFTA Should Exist" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tess99
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think he's apologized for his support of NAFTA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. And stunningly - it STILL doesn't matter n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tess99
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Edwards's record does not matter! Haven't you heard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Oh sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. The complete flip-flop is the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenfrequed
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 08:29 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Tue Jan-01-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
40. Uh ... US signed NAFTA 12/92 under GHWB; Senate ratified 12/93 pre-Edwards (who first ran in 98) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Well jesus christ, I didn't say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
20. Ha ha what did they say? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. LIAR LIAR LIAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. So, you put words in his mouth and are then outraged that he contradicts what he never said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I didn't put words in anybody's mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 04:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Maybe it's time you stepped away from the computer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Oh my! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. geez -- just when I thought postings couldn't get creepier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tess99
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. as opposed to what he believed 4 years ago, right. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemKR
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. This Hillary supporter LOVES Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tess99
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. If he wins Iowa, it's a win for your girl. I can't blame you for loving him. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. But he's never been on the cover of Fortune Magazine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. If NAFA involves 'fair trade', why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
11. This is crap. It's from Feb. 2004, and isn't true. Reprehensible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. This in reference to the "Obama lies about Edwards" shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. No excuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. They're HIS WORDS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redbear
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. This is from 2004. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why in the world would you post something like that? It tends not to lend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. It's HIS words, he didn't oppose NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Tue Jan-01-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. And don't forget: he didn't speak out against secession in 1861 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse
![]() |
Tue Jan-01-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
43. love your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. Do you really trust Adam Nagourney for your political coverage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. I trust John Edwards' OWN WORDS n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. It makes no difference how they've been edited or cut, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Those particular words are clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Tue Jan-01-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
42. "I think we do need to renegotiate it. The problem with NAFTA is these side agreements don't work .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
27. I saw Edwards in Wisconsin last Fall. He spoke admittedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. They all say that n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. So what was Edwards stance regarding the H-1B visa policy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
31. But remember, this is the new John Edwards. The "reformed populist" one. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
33. Published: February 24, 2004--he has seen the folly of his past position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 07:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Don't give in so easily: this is four years ago and he's talking about renegotiating NAFTA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. You better alert the Edwards campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
39. Maybe he's seen the reality now. In any case, Edward's core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC