|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:52 PM Original message |
Is Edwards becoming the next Nader?? OR If he continues losing, does he stick it out to try to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. The "next Nader?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. A person who continues to run for an office that they know they will not win, but do so to affect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texastoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. There's a thing called the National Democratic Convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. Oh, I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #25 |
51. Actually I wonder when John will bow out if he continues losing or if he stays in for all 48 other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
31. Does that mean that the only candidate that should be running is Hillary Clinton? Or is it Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:47 PM Response to Reply #31 |
50. No, but I wonder when JE will drop out if he continues to lose..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. I wonder this..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. How the fuck can he be the next Nader? He's a goddamned Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. well, Nader was a Democrat once, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Hi GreenArrow, nice to hear from you. Have any heads exploded yet??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I think he's influencing the other candidates somewhat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Clintons victory speech the other night was a good example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. No, I don't think Edwards deserves all the credit for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
54. Good points but I never thought JE would jump from the Party, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Well, they do have somewhat similar histories... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. He's a Democrat. He CANNOT be a Ralph Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lebam in LA (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. 2 States Have Spoken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
6. He's only 6 delegates behind Clinton, you know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. What would you say if JE lost South Carolina??? When do you think its time to get out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. When should your candidate get out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. JE was a known name since the 2004' election. He had that OVER Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Obama had a year's worth of hype and over $100 million |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
52. Not an Obama supporter, just someone pointing out the fact that JE has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Not if his delegate count was still competitive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #19 |
45. It will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. These primaries started way too early. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. For as much effort and time that JE put into Iowa......the only got 2nd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Obama outspending everyone and still needing Republican support? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
48. It is what it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Definitely interesting and somewhat faith restoring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
22. I'm glad the primaries didn't end in NH or Iowa, no matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
10. He has to stay. If Obama falls he will pick him up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. Nader ran as a Green in the General Election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
13. You are daft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
14. He is not yet in a real position to be a Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. We'll see. I am not sure what is going to happen, but I do know that JE has performed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. Delegates: Obama 25 Hillary 24 Edwards 18 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
21. He's staying in because no one else is addressing in detail what he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. "no one else is addressing in detail what he is" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 01:03 AM Response to Reply #39 |
49. None of the other frontrunners are, I meant to say n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
26. "Much food for thought?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comradebillyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm no Edwards fan but he does not deserve to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
33. I think Edwards, and his DU supporters, are becoming the next Kuccinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Excuse me??? [n\t] |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
35. This is not the General Election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
40. I Think I'm Going To Have To Stop Checking In Here! Two States |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
41. Walking my precinct today, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
42. LoZocolo, is that you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #42 |
57. Yep, you got my point. Your point is good to think about to though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
44. Support for Edwards is growing, and people need to stop letting MONEY elect Presidents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
46. Edwards is the only real Democrat in the race. How does that make him Nader? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #46 |
61. ALL our candidates are real Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-09-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
47. Edwards is the best candidate. The press wants Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #47 |
58. That there is the simple facts of the scene. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
55. Has John Edwards withdrawn from the Democratic primary to announce his run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-10-08 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
56. Absolutely NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-11-08 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
60. Nader was not a proud Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC