Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FlashBack: Recount in New Hampshire Ends With No Significant Discrepancies (Nov 2004)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:18 PM
Original message
FlashBack: Recount in New Hampshire Ends With No Significant Discrepancies (Nov 2004)
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 11:19 PM by kansasblue
Nader-Camejo Hand Recount in New Hampshire Ends With No Significant Discrepancies
New Hampshire�s optical scan machines predate Diebold�s purchase of company that manufactured them

Washington, DC: The Nader-Camejo hand recount in New Hampshire ended Tuesday at 12:30 p.m. when the last of the 11 selected wards was counted. Nader-Camejo requested recounts on Nov. 5 in precincts where the Diebold AccuVote optical scan machine was used, and where the reported vote count favored President George W. Bush by 5% to 15% over what was expected based on exit polls and voting trends in New Hampshire. The Nader-Camejo campaign received more than 2,000 faxes from citizens urging a recount.

http://www.votenader.org/media_press/index.php?cid=413
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Periodically there are gross errors, but really the optical scans aren't
that bad. We use them here in Waukesha and let me tell you, the counts accurately reflect the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. exactly...
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 11:28 PM by stillcool47
isn't that what we want?..... hand-count a percentage of the votes..every time.
How many precincts was that?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, I read your post but one can also understand the confussion...
With Diebold having anything to do with owning any company these days, ya just don't know what to believe anymore....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC