|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:03 PM Original message |
Kerry, Edwards Refuse to Join Kucinich in Protecting U.S. Jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SangamonTaylor
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. Edwards wants to 'renegotiate' NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. If it's the same, why not just say it flat out? Why dance around it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KC21304
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. How about saying what Kerry really said on the subject. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. The side agreements are unenforceable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
52. If workers rights were "so important"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SangamonTaylor
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. I would think that you would know better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. But it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Your title is misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Not my title, it's the title of the press release. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Then why would you post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I agree with it... I didn't say I didn't agree with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 06:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
47. If you agree with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
3. Unsurprisingly deceptive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. One can always count on you to get personal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. You mean the one thing you did NOT link to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yep that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. caught again.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Ah another one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:51 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. My digs are reserved for candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. well, now, that would depend... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. You might want to look at post #34 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. I did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. Who is paying Kerry and Edwards for their anti-American jobs stand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. American jobs depend on trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Protecting American jobs is our Number One Priority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Using the loaded term "Protectionism" is a scare tactic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. sure, but it only scares rich people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Well honestly I have to disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Protagoras
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. could you link that survey please :D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:16 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Trying to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Protagoras
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
43. Thanks RQ :D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. American jobs are being hemorrhaged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. we have Protectionism for CEO's jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. GOOD ON YA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
34. And that's not dishonest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. saying anyone who is for protecting jobs is for tariffs is dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. So now you're not for protectionism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idlisambar
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
50. Kucinich doesn't mind the term protectionist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SangamonTaylor
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. i agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mac2
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. Read my posted article about China in the Economic forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Angry enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revcarol
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
28. What gets me is that Kerry voted for the damn things over...and over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 04:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. I guess you don't care about union members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revcarol
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. And a whole lot of those jobs went to Mexico... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Those union members disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhite5
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Big Difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 06:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. What's the difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revcarol
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. DK is a union man through and through. He would never do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangh0
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Not intentionally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
revcarol
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:35 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. And just what is Kerry's idea of "fair trade?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangha
![]() |
Sat Feb-28-04 12:39 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. That's just not true. Why distort? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idlisambar
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 07:44 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Tradewatch -- NAFTA is hurting Mexican farmers and workers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sangha
![]() |
Sat Feb-28-04 12:40 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. What's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idlisambar
![]() |
Sat Feb-28-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. The point is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaggieSwanson
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
39. Thanks for posting this, redqueen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lams712
![]() |
Fri Feb-27-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
48. Way to go DK!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrFunkenstein
![]() |
Sat Feb-28-04 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
57. I'm Against U.S. Jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus
![]() |
Sun Feb-29-04 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
59. Is this the Dems PNAC? Is Kucinich's dream all that off base? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC