|
framework of establishment assumptions.
If you mean "inside," one could quibble whether Kerry's list of policy points or Edwards' charm was more compelling.
If you mean "outside," IMO, Sharpton won by a huge margin, Kucinich did admirably, and the other two were droning bores. I'm a DK guy, but let's give credit where it's due: NOBODY matches Sharpton for the ability to hit extraordinary high notes with power and accuracy, in 10-second statements. His challenge to Bumiller was courageous & magnificent - "calling her out" on her cheap attempts to confine the proceedings to Kerry & Edwards. He said other great things as well, but the shot at Bumiller stands out, because it was something that so badly needed saying.
The main thing to be said about the debate is not along the lines of who won it. Rather, it's the vivid demonstration of how political dialogue has become completely impossible in this country. The media tries to stage a debate, & wants all responses in 30 seconds or so, with only the 2 "safe" candidates allowed to talk, and with moronic questions like "Is God on America's side" being the subjects of "discussion." This was much more of a non-debate than a debate. Everything that would make for a real debate was actively resisted by the media.
|