Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is your definition of "progressive"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:29 PM
Original message
What is your definition of "progressive"?
I ask, because I hear the term bandied about loosely, here.

For example, would a progressive mean someone who has the best interest of the people at heart?

Would that include a record on environmental issues unmatched by anyone in congress?

Would it include standing up to big business interests, when those interests clash with the greater good of society?

How about introducing true campaign finance reform?

What about a plan to make health care affordable for millions of Americans not previously covered?

Question: What is it about John Kerry, that causes many of you to believe that he is not a "progressive" candidate?

Rational thought is welcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. progressive
means socialist, or leaning for Social reforms

Insurance is by no means Progressive

Single payer health care, education

larger expansive government

etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's one
In the spirit of Robert LaFollette, the great Progressive leader of the 20th century: a Progressive also says a resounding NO to militarism and its destructive impact on the country and the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. well
the "Progressives" of the early 20th century were mostly bad characters

i believe progressives today stand for far different things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes and no.
The early 20th century progressives weren't all bad. For example I'm not a huge fan of Teddy Roosevelt but Bob LaFollette was right on the money, IMHO.

He spoke out against corporate greed, about workers rights, about greater access to the government for the common people. He was also anti-militaristic, which is a major reason he broke with Teddy over WWI.

LaFollette was also the found of the Progressive magazine (IIRC), which is still published monthly in Madison, WI. It has been a champion of progressive causes for 95 years now, and is a link back to the progressives of yesteryear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes
But prohibition, spiked chastity belts...WASP culture...all somewhat bad

you are correct, there were many great reforms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lams712 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. 20th Century were "Mostly Bad Characters"??????
What and WHO do you mean by that????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R3dD0g Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The early 20th century progressives
strongly believed that the 'poor' should have their family sizes limited, by gov't fiat if necessary. Planned Parenthood wasn't started to give women more freedom over their own bodies, it was begun to limit the number of mouthes a poor family had to feed.

They were only trying to stem the growing poverty in the inner cities, but still, their progressiveness was punitive to personal liberty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. bullshit...
that is a lie - that was the agenda of a different group of people - and i'll just bet you're familiar with them - you are twisting things - what is your agenda...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
32. are you implying that...
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 11:43 AM by Ysabel
you think lafollette was a "bad character"...?

edit - i meant to use your words...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Russ Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Progressive
Moving forward; advancing.

Proceeding in steps; continuing steadily by increments: progressive change.

Promoting or favoring progress toward better conditions or new policies, ideas, or methods: a progressive politician; progressive business leadership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgarretson Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. that's what I was thinking too...
Hey Murikan,
That was my take on progressive too... I think it's the spirit that we can always do better by the world and it's people than we are now... Progressives realize and understand that and work for it to varying degrees.

-Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I just think it has to be defined in feneral terms and not specific issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. That's my def. I find it funny that many who call themselves progressive
on DU seem obessesed with past votes, and are demanding fast radical changes in the political system in contradiction to both of the identifying characterstics of progressivism (ie. look to the future, and gradual evolving progress)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. that's a dictionary definition
It's the same definition that the DLC cynically uses.

It is a movement in politics, with a definite history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. NAFTA/WTO/GATT free trade encompasses everything a progressive should
be against
from slavery my god slavery arent we the 21st century
to the rape of land
to theprivatisation of public services like water
to rampant corporatism
to outsourcing
to the stripping of workers rights
to militarization/imperalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. also when he handed bush the shredder to put the bill of rights in via
the PATRIOT ACT and when he trusted bush w/the lives of our troops in a bullshit oil war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kerry is not a progressive, hes a democrat
Kucinich is a progressive. its the difference between a socialist and a democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rdfi-defi Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. be carefull there smart guy someone might call you on that and ask you to
define socialist. or ask you to define democracy ( "democrat" ). thoes are such loaded terms these days, without defanitions from you, i might think you were trying to soil the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. I find it hard to believe that anyone who looks at twenty years
worth of Kerry's voting record would not call the man a progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. if you have to ask
you'll never understand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. I strongly disagree. I have listened to many people on this
forum, and it seems that to many, "progressive" has a different connotation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. however
It has an indisputable historical connotation. It is an identifiable tradition in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lams712 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. A prgressive, in my opinion, and in addition to the above...
....definitions, is one who looks at problems in the real world and looks for solutions from more of an outsider's perspective.

A person may be a "liberal", but they are more for working within the system. A progressive is more apt to challenge the system to bring about change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Someone interested in progress
Winning elections is a pretty good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. by that definition
we could call George Bush progressive. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Except he's not interested in progress and he lost the election
so I guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. he's interested in progress
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 11:36 AM by maxanne
the progress of his empire, the fortunes of his friends, and the progress of the PNAC agenda.

As for winning - well the election hasn't been won yet.

It's disappointing that someone who writes for a living couldn't give us a better definition of the term "progressive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. It's a shame you can't post a reply to me, ever, in any thread,
without saying something snide.

*snide reply coming in 3...2...1...*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. not true
I used to be one of the adoring multitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. "Affordable" my ass.
Translation "If we dump enough extra public money into for-profit insurance companies' coffers, will they pretty please insure a few more of us?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. Dennis K is a progressive
Look over his platform and his record to understand what that means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
26. 'progressive' has a VERY SPECIFIC political connotation
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 10:55 AM by dymaxia
Many, many people have worked their butts off for progressive causes for decades, and I don't like to see the term co-opted and distorted.

'Progressive' politics have a history in this country. It is irresponsible for those actively involved in politics to deny that history - whether deliberately or unwittingly.

Now, even the DLC is using the term - quite deliberately, I think.

http://progressiveliving.org/progressivism.htm

Progressivism is a political movement that represents the interests of ordinary people in their roles as taxpayers, consumers, employees, citizens, and parents. To coin a phrase, progressivism champions government "of the people, by the people, for the people."

Ordinary people. Progressivism is a movement of, by and for -ordinary- people. Not people who just have some of the 'correct' stances on issues but who also want to get into all the right cocktail parties. It is about accountability to ordinary citizens. As such, it is critical of powerful interests and favors the interests of ordinary people over corporations.

It is not just about certain issues - it is fundamentally anti-elite and reform-minded. That is the thread that connects the progressivism of the past with that in the present.

Progressives are typically portrayed as being "far left", and yet this characterization is in many ways misleading. This impression arises largely because the elitist mass media simplistically portrays American politics as being a one-dimensional split between "liberals" and "conservatives". In fact, American politics are far more complex, and can't be properly understood unless we add (at least) one more dimension: elitism vs. populism.

The progressive agenda of today includes many more things than are in John Kerry's platform. In fact, John Kerry has moved away from liberal stances in recent years.

Progressivism is a very clear movement both inside and outside of the Democratic Party. Most Democrats are not part of this progressive tendency.

There is a Progressive Caucus in the Congress:

http://bernie.house.gov/pc/

Here are their names:

http://bernie.house.gov/pc/members.asp

Dennis Kucinich
Barbara Lee
Lynn Woolsey
Peter DeFazio
Jesse Jackson, Jr
Major Owens
Bernie Sanders
Hilda Solis
Neil Abercrombie
Tammy Baldwin
Xavier Becerra
Corrine Brown
Sherrod Brown
Michael Capuano
Julia Carson
William "Lacy" Clay
John Conyers
Danny Davis
Rosa DeLauro
Lane Evans
Eni Faleomavaega
Sam Farr
Chaka Fattah
Bob Filner
Barney Frank
Raul Grijalva
Luis Gutierrez
Maurice Hinchey
Sheila Jackson-Lee
Stephanie Tubbs Jones
Marcy Kaptur
Tom Lantos
John Lewis
Jim McDermott
James P. McGovern
George Miller
Jerry Nadler
Eleanor Holmes Norton
John Olver
Ed Pastor
Donald Payne
Nancy Pelosi
Bobby Rush
Jan Schakowsky
Jose Serrano
Pete Stark
Bennie Thompson
John Tierney
Tom Udall
Nydia Velazquez
Maxine Waters
Diane Watson
Mel Watt
Henry Waxman


Read the statement of purpose:

http://bernie.house.gov/pc/about/purpose.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. see also
http://www.progressivemajority.org

http://www.progressivemajority.org/values/economics.asp

We need to create rules for the global economy that work for working people, including:

Workers' rights and environmental protections — and the mechanisms to enforce them — in all trade accords.
Debt relief for impoverished nations.
Sustainable green growth with a renewed emphasis on full employment and decent work while making the necessary transition to a sustainable economy.
New initiatives to hold corporations accountable, shut down sweatshops and turn export-processing zones into showcases of decent work, not back alleys of exploitation.
Developing an America that leads in the struggle against disease and poverty, while creating the example of a just democracy for all.


And:

http://www.rollingthundertour.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Thanks for your posts, dymaxia
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. thanks...
from me too... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC