Now that he botched yet another campaign, feel free to vent any grievances against him here.
Edwards had potential. I'll give him that. But concentrating everything on Iowa proved to be an extremely bad move. And, being the campaign manager, Trippi should've foreseen how dangerous that strategy was and should've done something about it.
Trippi's scheme was the same in '08 than it was in '04. Rely heavily on the grassroots and the internet, and hope a win in Iowa will carry the candidate to the nom. He and Edwards ending up getting most of their support from exactly the same place Dean did in '04, the internet. However there is an inherent problem with this strategy. Richard Bennett wrote:
...Briefly put, Dean's problem is the Deaniacs. The Internet-driven campaign has enabled him to amass a large following, but they're primarily unbalanced people, fanatical followers, extremists, and wackos. In my experience with Internet-enabled activism, these are the kind of people most attracted to online chat and email wars, so an organization that's going to use these tools to recruit has to prune the weirdos before they run off the mainstream people...
...So politics, even in the age of the Internet, is still about people, not about technology, gimmickry, or gadgets, and most of the people are moderate, deliberate, and fairly sensible. Dean learned this the hard way, and the only thing that can save his campaign now is the fact that few people are paying attention to what's happening in Burlington or on the Stupid Network.
A telling fact in all this was Dean and Trippi's failure to believe their own campaign rhetoric. They said the campaign was energizing new voters and bringing in new volunteers to work the campaign, but they obviously didn't provide them with the kind of training and direction that's appropriate for political neophytes...
Source:
http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2004/01/29/the-stupid-campaign/And both times in '04 and '08 it resulted in outright defeats when the people went to the polls.