|
Ministers Without Portfolio (Yet) By CHRIS SPRIGMAN
After almost two months of free publicity during the Democratic primaries, several polls show John Kerry ahead of President Bush. Now that the Democrats have settled on their nominee, however, attention may turn elsewhere. The challenge for Mr. Kerry is to keep voters focused on his candidacy and his ideas.
<snip>
Shadow cabinets have not been used in the United States for both structural and political reasons. In parliamentary systems like Britain's, the winning party assumes power immediately after the election. In a presidential system like America's, voters elect individual candidates, and there is a transition period between the election and the assumption of power. In addition, candidates may be reluctant to form a shadow cabinet because they fear a member might say or do something embarrassing.
That risk certainly exists — but given President Bush's financial advantage, it may be worth taking. John Kerry should name a slate of accomplished, articulate people who would most likely serve in his administration. The expertise and energy of these shadow secretaries — who would have more authority than ordinary campaign surrogates — will keep the public focused on Mr. Kerry's message.
So who would serve in Mr. Kerry's shadow cabinet? There are many possibilities. Elena Kagan, the first female dean of Harvard Law School and a former counsel to President Bill Clinton, could be shadow attorney general and draw attention to the worst excesses of John Ashcroft. Gen. Wesley Clark could be shadow national security adviser, offering an alternative to the administration's unilateralist approach to the war on terror. Former Senator Gary Hart, who was a chairman of a federal commission on national security that issued warnings about terrorism in America before 9/11, could be shadow secretary of homeland security. more Source: New York Times Op-Ed 3/5/04
|