Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Nader helping Bush in order to boost his stock portfolio?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:14 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is Nader helping Bush in order to boost his stock portfolio?
We all know how the Wall St. bigwigs love Bush because he helps out the insiders. Since Nader is a corporate insider who masquerades as a corporate crusader, do you think that he is helping to throw the election to Bush for the purposes of boosting his stock portfolio and net worth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. When's the last time Nader championed an environmental issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. One of the reasons...
There may be other reasons also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. He did this kind of thing early in his career.
He bought Ford stock before exposing the Corvair.

I think the Corvair was the last useful thing he did since then. He's been enormously corrupt since then. There was NO accounting for PIRGs, Public Citizen, etc. during his tenure.

He's a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. A burdensome menance upon mankind may his type rot in hell
Ralph Nader Praises "Courage and Persistence" of Striking Southland Grocery Workers Criticizes corporate tactic of shifting health costs to workers as part of a domestic race to the bottom, February 16, 2004

Ralph Nader, Consumer Advocate, calls on Senators to Reject So Called "Compromise" Class Action Legislation Slated to hit the Senate Floor Next Week, January 20, 2004

Ralph Nader and 14 Civic Groups Call on Congressional Leadership to Make Voting Records Available to Public Via Internet, December 30, 2003

Ralph Nader letter to Senator Ted Stevens, November 10, 2003

Ralph Nader letter to Arnold Schwarzenegger , October 3, 2003

Nader Calls On President To State Where He Stands On Texas Republican Party Demands, October 2, 2003

Ralph Nader Urges House-Senate Conference Committee to Remove Harmful MTBE Provision From The Energy Bill (HR6), September 29, 2003

Ralph Nader Letter to Warren Buffett , September 24, 2003

Estimated Tax Savings of Bush Cabinet Under the New Tax Law
September 4, 2003

Ralph Nader Letter to Senator Bill Frist, July 9, 2003

Ralph Nader Letter to FCC Inspector General - H. Walker Feaster III,
May 29, 2003

Statement by Ralph Nader regarding Letters from Civics Groups to Pres. Bush,
March 10, 2003

Journalists Criticize Iraq/War Media Coverage,
March 4, 2003

Statement by Ralph Nader about Oil and the War Against Iraq
February 4, 2003

Broad Coalition Warns of Big Brother in Today's NY Times, January 17, 2003 - U.S. Newswire

Statement by Ralph Nader on the occasion of President George W. Bush's address in Scranton, Pennsylvania on medical malpractice., January 17, 2003 - U.S. Newswire

Nader Lauds Wellstone Legislation
October 21, 2002

'Corporate Socialism'
October 21, 2002

Nader Bearish on Merrill Lynch Settlement
October 21, 2002

Labor Leaders and Allies
Call for the Repeal of the TAFT-HARTLEY ACT
Labor Day

Nader/Love to Judge Kollar-Kotelly on MS case
November 5, 2001

Corporate Welfare for Wall Street
Feb. 13, 2001

Nader to Pataki/Giuliani: Stop NYSE Giveaway
12 Feb. 2001

Testimony of Ralph Nader on THE HOUSING FINANCE REGULATORY IMPROVEMENT ACT
U.S. House of Representatives
Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Securities, and Government Sponsored Enterprises
Committee on Banking and Financial Services, June 15, 2000

Consumer Harm in the Microsoft Case
Dec. 15, 1999

Keep Commercialism Out of Maternity Wards, Nader Urges Hospitals
August 27, 1999

Keep Commercialism Out of Maternity Wards, Nader Urges Hospitals
August 27, 1999

Letter to Pacifica Chairwoman on the sale of Pacifica stations
August 4, 1999

Letter to President Clinton and Senate and Congressional Leadership on Government Surplus Spending
July 19, 1999

Letter to Senate and Congressional Leadership on HMOs
July 15, 1999

Testimony of Ralph Nader on Corporate Welfare
Before the Committee on the Budget, U. S. House of Representatives, June 30, 1999

Letter to President Clinton and Vice President Gore
Condemning Recent Legislation Limiting Y2K Liability for Corporations
June 29, 1999

Testimony of Ralph Nader on Hr 10
Before the Committee on Banking And Financial Services, U. S. House of Representatives, February 11, 1999

"Saving Social Security From the Privatization Threat"Conference Statement
Rayburn House Office Building, January 21, 1999

Nader Criticizes "Sweetheart Deal" for Big Tobacco
November 16, 1998



http://www.nader.org/releases.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Missing the point, IMO
No one's denying that Nader has worked tirelessly for progressive causes.

What confounds many DUers, and many Dems as well, is why he can't acknowledge the very real possibility that his campaign could take enough votes away from the Dem nominee, someone who he could at least work with to further promote progressive causes, and thus hand the election back to the very people who have done so much damage to the very causes he claims to love.

No one's buying his denials that he didn't affect the 2000 election. Note I didn't say "cost Gore the election", I said affect. Nader can't even bring himself to admit that much.

Is it his ego? Is it because the Dems won't raise him on high as their lord and savior? What's the deal, Ralph?

I respect anyone's right be an independent, but fer God's sakes, with everything that's happened to our country in the last three years, is that really a luxury independents have?

Not trying to be combative. The man's run up a great record. I grew up knowing that Nader was one of the "good guys", fighting for the little guy. But exactly what is he, anymore? Because he sure as hell ain't fighting for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. How dare anyone but Kerry run in a democracy
Don't you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nator311 Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. you're missing the point
America has a two party system. Also, even in a place that has a PR system, such as France, there is a runoff election at first. After this members of the left or of the right build a coalition for the general election in order to satisfy some of their needs. Even the French Communists band together with the moderate liberals. Nader could have been smart and ran as a democrat in 2000, which would have probably given him a speaking role at the convention or a cabinet post. Instead, he chose to put the shrub in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Nader invests in Fidelity fund with Raytheon, and Halliburton
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 01:14 PM by jpgray
That one wasn't on your list. He also invests in slave-labor traders Gap, The Limited, and Wal-Mart. Let's not forget his hypocritical quotes, calling General Dynamics and Boeing some of the worst examples of the military industrial complex, yet he invests in both of them.

Writing letters and making statements can be done by anyone. Investing in the worst of corporate America, that takes some work.

edit: But of course it's good that he makes these statements. What's bad is that he doesn't live by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wonder where my pension is invested?
In any event you can be sure I'm not going to be likely to donate it all to programs or efforts to improve the lot of others.

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemId=9114
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ralph is a millionaire politician--your investments are hardly analogous
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 01:24 PM by jpgray
As a public figure who trumpets his vast superiority to the Democrats on these issues and moreover lambasted Gore for corporate stock, this hypocrisy is very serious and troubling. That he would invest in the very Fidelity fund denounced by WTO demonstrators and many erstwhile Nader's Raiders shows the most blatant and insulting hypocrisy. Good for Ralph that he speaks out and is right about the issues, BAD for Ralph that he can't follow his own advice and cut out the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. ho hum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. So why does he invest in the Magellan fund? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. What's the dollar value of his stock in, say, Halliburton?
Because it occurs to me that the best way to get information on a company, and actually be allowed to attend its stockholders' meetings, is to own stock in it. That may or may not explain some or all of the questionable investments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think he just fancies himself in the role of Kingmaker.
IMO, he wants to be able to dictate candidates and stands on issues to the Democratic Party. His theory seems to be that if he makes us lose enough elections, we'll have to give him everything he wants. He seems not to realize that if we gave him everything he wants, we'd lose even more elections.

BTW, I arrived at this impression by reading what his supporters have to say on DU. I think it fits, certainly better than the portfolio thing. Let's be fair, the man does have an impressive life record of service to progressive causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmm. A deliberate jiacinto impersonation? Red meat for the wolves?
I suspect IC is feeling mischievous today. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Shhhhhh...
You're blowing my cover in trying to get the Nader-baiters to come out of the closet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Whatever happened to Carlos?
Something must've happened in one of my extended absences from DU. Why isn't Carlos around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Check your PM in about a minute. I'll explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did Clark run to prevent edwards from winning and raising the LTCG rate to
25% on income over 300K so that Clark would save millions of dollars in tax on the kind of income he stands to earn for the rest of his life?

Probably not, but it makes more sense than Nader running to protect the value of his stock portfolio which is worth about 1 million bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. If Johnny boy doesn't get VP will he work as a lobbyist for ATLA?
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 03:32 PM by SahaleArm
Or will he go back to chasing? Or will he start lobbying for tax sheltors so he doesn't have to pay medicare tax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Since he never did any of that before, I don't know why he'd start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ah! That merry rattle...
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 02:12 PM by scarletwoman
of chains being yanked.... }(

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC