Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who here thinks they would make a better VP than Breaux, Landrieu or Bayh?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 04:01 PM
Original message
Who here thinks they would make a better VP than Breaux, Landrieu or Bayh?
Remember, if anything happens to the President, VP runs the show. Who would you trust with the number 1 spot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. why not Zell miller or Joe Lieberman?
talk about hold your nose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would like to see Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL_Zebub Donating Member (473 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Myself, of course.
Why settle for a lesser evil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wes Clark, of course. I keep imagining how he would
have reacted if he'd been the one reading to those little kids the morning of 9/11.

That's assuming, of course, that 9/11 would even have happened if Wes Clark--or John Kerry, or Bill Clinton, or Al Gore--had been president then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kerry won't choose Landrieu. Issue of Kerry's key requirement: "Prepared
for the Office." Landrieu, like many others mentioned, is just not
prepared for the role of CIC at at time of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nator311 Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bayh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would
I'm a Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Great response.
That's a qualification these three seem to lack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nonsense
All three of these senators are loyal Democrats in states where it's tough for a Democrat to get elected. They would all be terrific running mates for Senator Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Oh my goodness..
logic isn't allowed here. :eyes:

Reminder.. the VP's job is to primarily get the Presidential nominee past that magical 270 electoral vote mark. This would entail shoring-up a weakness (real or perceived), and/or opening-up electoral votes from a crucial state that would otherwise be near impossible.

Kerry could have Zell Miller as his VP for all I care. Or McCain. Or Lieberman. Once the VP is in office, his job is to have a pulse. That's all.

Meanwhile, Kerry will be in his oval-shaped office, nominating good liberal judges (for LIFETIME terms), issuing intelligent executive orders to restore compliance with the EPA/the UN/various treaties/etc, and killing bad conservative legislation with his mighty veto pen. When the VP is named, I hope people here logically calculate this thoroughly instead of having an emotional asthma attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Anyone who picks one of these three proves he cannot be trusted.
It is the first test of a nominee and, if he picks someone with aa 70% Republican voting record (as Landrieu claimed she had when she ran for re-election), Kerry will lose the left. It was not the right that cost Dean the nomination. It was losing the left. Without the left, Kerry cannot win the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC