|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:25 AM Original message |
Nomination is headed for CONVENTION -- Super Delegates will decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
1. Dennis Kucinich perhaps (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think the requirement would be a favorable McCain head-to-head number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
3. The party machinery is going to twist arms, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. What about Kennedy faction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. They'll fall in line, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. I don't know. Kennedy faction? Their not being able to even come |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow2u3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
5. John Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
6. Dare we say DRAFT GORE??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
droidamus2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:54 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Only choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:32 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Why on earth would anyone want to do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
39. It is call a compromise candidate that all can agree could win v McCain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. Superdelegates should pledge to give their votes to the candidate with the most state delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. No. If we are going to go that route, it ought to be the candidate with the highest popular vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ficus1 (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:52 AM Response to Reply #16 |
35. How do you accurately count caucus states then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Yeah. The whole system sucks. One ever happened to one man (person), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Who do you think they would have chosen just based on backroom negotiations without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. We may find out this summer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
9. Superdelegates will detract from both Obama *and* Hillary. It will be epic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
10. A shared ticket. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:53 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Three headed ticket does not feel right -- Hill Bill Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 07:55 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Oh, I forgot the little woman can't control her man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
15. why do you think that Clinton delegates would revolt if Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrmx9 (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:02 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Not having a candidate until almost September could be a disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:08 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Congratulations on the anniversary of your first thirty days on DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:06 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. They would feel the same way and revolt "visa versa" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
20. Ohio and Texas will help decide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
21. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:35 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Texas is winner take all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. It is, OP is confused. All Democratic races are proportional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. You may be right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
24. If so, OUR party will *splinter* and collapse for a time. I'll NOT condone ROYALTY (super delegates) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
25. I don't see any compromise candidate being picked over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 08:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Do you think Hillary will toss it to Obama if he is ahead in the PLEDGED delegates but she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Only if he does it after some compromise is reached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:11 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I think there is an ethic problem with counting delegates from banned states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. My take on the delegate ban |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
30. Toss a coin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. A two headed coin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sulawesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
31. Internal Power...people line up behind the powerful... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
37. Andrea Mitchel pundit discussion: Super delegates will be DECISIVE this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-06-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Superdelegates will have pressure to support candidate with most pledged delegates. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC