Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's young voters and black voters are no match for Hillary's older, women voters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:24 PM
Original message
Obama's young voters and black voters are no match for Hillary's older, women voters
Media Downplay Widespread Support for Hillary

Alternet
By Peggy Simpson, Women's Media Center.
February 6, 2008.

{snip}

Clinton won the hotly contested California primary with a huge margin among Hispanics, Asians -- and women. Women voted for her by a commanding 57-39 margin, ignoring appeals last weekend from Oprah Winfrey, Caroline Kennedy and her cousin Maria Shriver to switch to Obama.

Clinton's endorsements from three children of the late Robert Kennedy had been discounted, when noticed at all, by the East Coast media. They wrote in a Los Angeles Times op-ed piece that ran soon after Caroline Kennedy's bombshell Obama endorsement that, in essence, deeds count more than poetic words. Former Maryland Lieutenant Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend said she had worked with Clinton for 25 years, as had her two brothers for 15 years, on issues of children and poverty. This may have had resonance with California Latinos.

They stayed hitched to Clinton. They also turned out in record numbers, comprising nearly 30 percent of the California vote, voting 66-33 for Clinton. Hispanic women also voted with Clinton in Obama's home state of Illinois, as well as in other states where they are a significant bloc, such as New Jersey and New Mexico.

Super Tuesday reinforced certain realities. Obama does best with blacks, more affluent and better educated voters and with those under 30. He is doing better with whites than in earlier primaries. Clinton wins with a solid bloc of women voters, a better than 2-1 margin among Hispanics, an even larger one among Asian voters and a major edge among older voters.

That doesn't tell the full story. Women are turning out in record numbers and have averaged 58 percent of Democratic primary voters. Young voters are not. Their turnout Tuesday ranged from 8 percent in New Mexico to 16 percent in California but the average was about 12 percent -- not much more than their historic average. The Iowa caucus surge of young voters has not been replicated elsewhere.

More pertinent is the fact that Obama's clout with young voters is eclipsed by Clinton's strength with voters 60 and over, who form a core chunk of the Democratic electorate. They constituted 30 percent of the voters in New York and Massachusetts, 36 percent in New Mexico, 28 percent in California and 32 percent in Missouri.


http://www.alternet.org/election08/76211/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_State_Elitist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. It usually is the older women that come in groups that make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. why the backlash against the young who would have to fight in a war if drafted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. go play somewhere else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. There is no backlash against young voters. From the article:
"Women are turning out in record numbers and have averaged 58 percent of Democratic primary voters. Young voters are not."

Campaigning for and supporting your candidate is all well and good, but it's the votes that count. It doesn't matter how enthusiastic you are about a candidate, unless you show enough commitment to get out and vote for your candidate it's a wasted effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. How many of those older women read the BCCI report? If they had they'd never vote
for a Bush or a Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. way off point
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 02:27 PM by bigtree
start your own thread on that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Wrong, big. I AM an older woman and this thread is about....ME.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 02:40 PM by blm
heh. So I'm pondering why SOME older women (who SHOULD be more like me) have never bothered to show an interest in their country's actual historic record enough to become more informed voters.

That's all. ;))))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. sweetie
you're a gem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. She will also win the Latino vote.
Sidenote: Someone needs to tell John Nichols (The Nation) that the tension between Latino's and Blacks is mutual so stop trying pin all the blame on the Latinos.

Also Oprah Winfrey, Caroline Kennedy, Maria Shriver are three people one should never listen to when it comes to such serious matters as electing a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I don't wish for that tension to have any influence.
we need to come together in the fall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. And I'm SURE you'd be saying the same thing if they'd backed Hillary.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. Oh you can listen to Oprah. You just don't have to do what she says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. It takes effort to turn out young voters.
You have to organize. Obama was able to do that in Iowa but not California. Obama can win in November with good organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I thought Kerry did as good as anyone
but, in 2004 the youth didn't show up in the numbers projected. I think some education is in order, but the key is to design that drive around the individual states and their particular rules and schedules. I saw where there was some confusion in neighboring Va. over if they were supposed to vote yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. That's because the youth vote was still tied to Dean.
Kerry was a poor compromise.

Just as those youth who ARE turing out in record numbers for Obama are just as likely to stay home in November if Hillary gets the nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:37 PM
Original message
Youth showed up in large numbers in '04.
Larger than in the past.
At the same time Kerry said very little to young voters. They weren't going to get out and vote based on what he did during or after Vietnam, which is what half the election was about. Young people showed up to vote against Bush but no one showed up to vote FOR Kerry. He didn't give them much of a reason to.
Obama will do better because he speaks to young people and gives them something to vote for and not just someone to vote against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. you've got a good case to argue on that
from Rock the Vote:

It’s true that there was a lot of talk about young voters in both 2004 and 2006 – but for very good reason. After a nearly continuous downward turnout trend since 1972, turnout among 18-29 year olds was up significantly in 2004 and 2006.

* In 2004, 20.1 million 18-29 year olds voted, a 4.3 million jump over 2000. The turnout increase (9% points) among the youngest voters was more than double that of the overall electorate (4% points). (U.S. Census Bureau)

* In 2006, the youth increased by 1.9 million over 2002 levels. Turnout among the youngest voters grew by 3% points over 2002, twice the turnout increase (1.7% points) of older voters. (U.S. Census Bureau)

In fact, in 2004 the turnout rate of 18-29 year olds was higher than all but one year (1992) since 18-20 year olds got voting rights in 1972.

more: http://blog.rockthevote.com/2007/12/for-media-young-voter-myths-and-facts.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Plus, its harder to get young people to vote in a primary.
If there had been turn out comparable to a general election then the youth vote would have made a bigger difference for Obama. He had a very strong organizational effort to get them voting in Iowa but California came too fast and is too large. That's why Hillary won CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm an "older woman" for Obama and many of my "older women" friends
are for Obama and some of my rock solid Republican friends are for Obama...Obama will roll right over John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedomofspeech Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
48. same here.....
I don't have one female friend supporting Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't be so sure both my sister in law and me
both white middle agers are voting for obama. and I know alot of others...even my 80 yr old mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. that's not bearing out in the stats. Let's hope it pulls even in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. The thing is that Dem women will vote for Obama in November, not sure about Independents
for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. The thing is that every time Dem women hear, read this one, they re-examine that
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 02:34 PM by robbedvoter
so call wisdom - and the fact that you don't see how offensive it is, makes it even worse. Some of us, emotional Dem women are kinda fed up with those attitudes - you might to dial back the arrogance a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Huh?
Are you saying that lifelong Dem women will NOT vote for Obama if he gets the nomination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. We'll see. But I notice that the author neglected something
very important. White men are going for Obama- not Clinton, and ssdly, I think this is a trend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. actually, I've seen them about evenly split
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. no. I'll try and find the article I read about it.
even though I'm for Obama I hate seeing that stuff. Just as I hate seeing the AA vote and the latino vote so polarized. It's funny but it doesn't bother me to see older voters or younger voters or more and less affluent voters going in a certain way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. well, this is the primary
I imagine we'll be unified against the republican by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I do not think
that is a bad thing. There are different groups within the democratic party. If any group made a decision based upon hatred of another group (racism, sexism, etc) then it would be sad. There is no doubt that some people are motivated by fear, anger, and hatred -- DU provides solid evidence of that. But I assume that most groups are deciding who they will support, based upon the qualifications of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not to mention white men. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm an older woman voter
Gobama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. It is amazing that Obama has matched Hillary given her support from women and older voters.
Is that your point?

He must have something going for him. He must be getting his share of votes from somewhere, if not from women, older voters and Hispanics. Will Obama's support fade because the people who support him are less dependable or don't vote? So far his groups are matching up fairly evenly against hers. If his support fades, I'll offer my congratulations to Hillary.

We will see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I think the dynamic of the primary has suited his campaign well.
He still has some major state problems, but in states with defined demographics which favor him, he does well. Do you see a scattering of that support with the scattered demographics? I'm just talking out of my ass on this, but it would explain Cali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. Not sure I understand.
If by "states with defined demographics which favor him" you mean states with lots of African Americans, he does indeed to well in those states and he has done well in states without many AAs. Similarly, Hillary has done well in states with lots of Hispanics and she has done well in states that don't have that many.

They each have bases of support (I suppose all presidential candidates do), then they strive to reach out to other voters. If Obama can't appeal successfully to voters in states without a lot of Blacks, then he won't win the nomination. He's done well at this so far, but who knows if it will continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I think he does have a broad section of support, but these numbers cited in the article
show weaknesses against Clinton in these groups. I would expect those differences in support to mostly disappear in the general election, no matter who is the nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well, this older woman voter is not "Hillary's".
I can think on my own and unlike a lot of them, won't vote for her just because she's a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. I'm with you , sparosnare. I am a 62 year old white Grandma for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think those older women voters would turn out for Obama
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 02:43 PM by RamboLiberal
in the GE. I think though that most of the young voters energized by Obama will not turn out for Hillary. And there's a very good chance a good chunk of the African-American vote will be very tempted to sit this one out if they feel the Democratic party and Clinton have slighted them.

I also think the Hispanic vote would turn out for Obama over the xenophobic Repukes and a pandering McCain for the GE.

IMHO Hillary has too many voters who would never pull the lever for her to win the states needed to get the electoral college numbers needed to win.

Obama I think has the chance to pick up more states than Hillary.

But who knows - our party is taking a risk this season with either candidate - but hey either way feels good to me over what the Repukes offer. It's just my opinion that Obama gives us the better chance to win the WH. But I'm voting for whomever wins the nomination. I just hope what happens with the party and I'm speaking of a brokered convention, super delegates, trying to seat Mich and Florida, etc., won't be something that turns Dems against each other. Even if this happens and I'm pissed and holding my nose I see no alternative but to still vote for the candidate even if I'm sending flaming letters to Howard Dean and the DNC.

BTW I'm a 55 year old white female who will vote for Obama in the Pennsylvania primary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. In a state like Florida, older voters are going to be really
important, if one wishes to win a general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. This one is even better:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. that's been discussed here.
I think some consideration should be given, however, to the patterns which have already occurred. You are right, however, to suppose that these voters would respond in a more enthusiastic and organized manner in the general election against the republican candidate. In that effort, we really have no way of knowing how the campaign of, say, McCain, will affect our nominee's appeal to these groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
36. Isn't that kinda hard to tell?
Historical turnout, that is. These are primaries, and many states have not had competetive primaries since 1992. In our last caucus in 2004, there were less than 20 participants. This year we had 600. That feels like a record turnout in all demographics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
37. I AM WOMAN, HEAR ME ROAR!
Older women are smart, level-headed, don't drink much Kool-Aid and really aren't very fond of cults.:)

GO, HILLARY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. He is, after all, The Black Candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. a great deal of his support leading to victory came from the votes of blacks
in states like Ga., S.C., and Alabama. That bloc was diluted in states with a more scattered, diverse population where Clinton was able to pull in Latinos, Asians, and women of all races to give her the edge.

But, Obama also has a decent draw on white voters, male and female, which make him extremely competitive with Clinton (the white, woman candidate ;))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
44. geezers rule!

those kids and blacks don`t know shit..they are being brainwashed by the cult of obama!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. the 'kids' need better support from the party in the primary season
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. you are correct..if we lose them now...
well the party lost me during the 60`s, i had hope with bobby then he was was killed...i gave up being political until the mid 90`s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
49. That's the problem with shutting down the whole
public education enterprise: people under 50 don't even know what a primary or a caucus is. I find it disgusting that these people with demonstrably less stake in the future dominate our choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC