|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:35 PM Original message |
"Would you rather win FL, CA, MA, PA, OH or IA, ME, LA, SC, UT"......you get the idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fenriswolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. wait untill the general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. If she flunks in TX and OH you will have to admit she's done, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. No. Obama is untested. Rezko trial coming up. Etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. So even if he wins TX and OH with more than 40% (essentially a tie), you'll say she's still in it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. This poster does not belong on our board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. We already know Obama is going to win those states so I would rather he be competitive in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. we already know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. You think Obama is going to lose California and Massachusetts to Republicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. you're actually posting that she's won states that she has NOT won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Why should that matter? It's a classic P2BA thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I think you meant MO an Missouri is the best indicator of how well a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. thanks for the correction. That is what I meant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. When I read the title, before I saw your name, I just knew it was you.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Thats funny! Me too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. Hillary hasn't won PA or OH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. The point is there is nothing that spells an Obama victory at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. And there's nothing that spells a Hillary victory either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. the smart money says "I don't know" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Then why not start a thread saying that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. How about the fact that he swept everything this weekend and has momentum? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:59 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. He had momentum after IA. He had momentum going into CA and MA. It never pays off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
14. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's still democrats voting in those red states and a lot of them post on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
16. What elitist cocktail party gibberish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
17. Thanks. Now go play with your blocks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-10-08 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
21. but I thought we were supposed to win over the heartland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
27. Note how the poster picks out Obama's less likely states, & then adds states HRC has yet to win ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC