|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:34 PM Original message |
Would Clinton go into a protracted legal fight against the DNC for MI and FL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. She'll try to do anything to win... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. You people act like she's all powerful when she's losing this election pitifully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. I hope so - couple of million votes equals just about all Obama's caucuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. So win at all costs, screw how petty it'd make her look, especially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. The one trying to hide the votes probalby looks the worst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Yes, Obama not wanting them seated would look bad, which is why it can't come to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avrdream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Wow, P2BA, that's the first time I have seen all your hearts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. I think the only reason she would brig a possible suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. The superdelegates would be the ones making that decision, not Hillary, not the judicial systems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. If Clinton sues the DNC, she'll lose the superdelegates for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. No. Anyone here saying she would are stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
28. Clintons don't play safe -- they go for broke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. Hell yes. When the rules are not to her liking they should be ignored. just like jr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. When all you people are proved wrong, I will point and laugh at your utter revulsion toward one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Hope so. Voters voted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Don't be assinine. She'll request to have them seated. Obama, if they matter, won't. Supers would... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. I think it is inevitable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Ugh, why do you people parrot this crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. You do know what Senator Nelson said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. They could still be seated by Hillary, the superdelegates, or (unlikely) Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. If Clinton files suit? I've been out of this loop, but I didn't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. How would you feel if she filed a suit to get the delegates from MI and FL? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I would be repulsed at such an idiotic move. She'd lose all political capital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Thanks. And FTR, I'm an Obama supporter but just wondered how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Honestly, I think we should have another primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. You aren't allowed by party rules. You CAN caucus though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. You probably need to get that information to Camp Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't think she'll get in a legal battle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:00 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Thank you. Wow, the first ardent Obama supporter to say this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
22. Frankly, I think the candidates should stay out of those decisions. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
26. The courts would dismiss this faster than you can say "Day 1" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #26 |
32. You are correct. No Justiciable Controversy!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC