|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:20 PM Original message |
Okay, let's see if we can get an Obama supporter to finally answer this.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Just a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I'd guess you'd have to ask Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I'm willing to - but help me out here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. SNORT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex Talionis (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
46. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
77. 5'10" never sounded so good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ignore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. And I will keep asking it every night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. fingers in ear...lallalalallallalalala |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Same OP, rephrased and posted 100 times, doesn't bear revisiting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
48. Actually look down thread... someone finally gave an honest answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. Will someone please tell me how to put someone on ignore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. Go to the top of their post - there are icons on the right . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #52 |
85. Thank you very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. Anytime - I don't have any at the moment, but if I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. DO you beat your wife/husband? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Nope -- never have. Now can you answer the question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I'll re-phrase that: "How often do you beat your wife/husband?" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flor de jasmim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Rephrasing... (I can't resist) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
55. Welcome to DU, Sandi. Have a heart! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. ....... wth? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because cutting off funding for troops already deployed is different that voting to deploy troops. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. But now he IS in favor of troop withdrawals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. I'm curious about something... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. People gave them to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
65. so you're saying that those who have voted against the continued funding are wrong? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. Most people are not going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Sure I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. I don't wanna argue with you mags, not today. I'll buy ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
50. Go to Trader Joe's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #50 |
60. 2 buck Chuck -- yeah, baby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:38 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. I think it varies by location |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. I never heard of the place.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. They're on the coasts mostly (now not even remotely on-topic) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. I have seen her make honest points. The fact that glitterbabies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1awake (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. glitterbabies.. hmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. Bush would have taken the money from other Pentagon programs to keep Iraq going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. So why he is for troop withdrawals now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Shhhhhh...... shhhhhhhhhhh..... there, there, now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #25 |
42. God, that's great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #25 |
71. Must...vote..Obama...Hope for Change.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #71 |
93. You are very sleepy...you really ARE a chicken...you will now cross the road and vote for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
33. Simple, because the Democrats are running Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. How does that factor in? What difference does it make who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. You need 60 senators to agree to a vote, so you need 60 to do anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Again, what does that have to do with the flip flop on this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
88. perhaps this might help? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
96. He wasn't running for president when he was against that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
13. cite some facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. Here you go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. That's a really good resource |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
57. and here YOU go- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Okay, that explains why he was against defunding and troop withdrawals THEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #59 |
73. the reality is- and it is not a pretty one, but it is reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. I posted a link to his voting record - you'll need to read the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mopinko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:36 PM Original message |
from the new york times- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saturday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
17. I think you bring up a legitimate question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
19. which bill are you referring to? THis one from 2005? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yeswecan08 (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
26. The media has scrutinized him to no end - somebody hasn't been paying attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. LOL - the media has not even begun to scrutinize him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
30. I will give you my take. They should never had voted for the IWR in the first place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. So first he was against troop withdrawals and defunding.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
63. once you break a nation- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
74. He wasn't for us getting into Iraq in the first place. That is the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. So why is he for them now when he was against them before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. I am not following you, he is not for us staying in Iraq, both candidates aren't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
32. You have the unmitigated gall to ask for "No tantrums, no bullshit?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. uh huh... done with your tantrum now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. No, I will not answer any of your questions. You're the only one to which I say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #47 |
61. Done with your tantrum now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
56. exactly, she's a waste of fucking oxygen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #56 |
79. Then why do you read my posts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
38. The answer is obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. I think I would tend to agree with that... thanks for the honest answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #43 |
62. Well, his voting record isn't the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
45. In fairness, it's been the Republicans who have brought the funding resolutions to the floor, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. That's only one of the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
49. Did Hillary vote to defund the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #49 |
58. She has now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #58 |
84. I'm against the war, but I disagree with pulling the funding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
53. Because he knew * would hold the troops hostage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Okay, so why is he for those same dem proposals now that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. He's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. Well he voted for the last round of troop withdrawals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. And? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. No, I posted his record... he was against troop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #82 |
91. I assume he thought it could happen now and couldn't happen then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #82 |
97. He knew he couldn't win the nomination if he didn't flip flop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
54. It won't matter, you won't believe it, and you'll just fly off the handle again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:38 PM Response to Reply #54 |
66. IOW, you don't want to say, or don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:39 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. No you don't, you piss all over their replies without even a moment's thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. If you don't have a response that is responsive to the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #54 |
86. Completely agree. If they're for HRC, they do more harm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
89. I've decided to make you disappear thru primary season....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hill_YesWeWill (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
90. Well, I can't really answer that, I think only he could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
92. He's against the war - but not against the troops sent there to fight it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Then why did he vote against funding after he began running for president? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
95. When did our party attempt to defund the war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC