Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why terrorists prefer Bush and DON'T want Kerry to win.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 10:07 PM
Original message
Why terrorists prefer Bush and DON'T want Kerry to win.
Edited on Fri Mar-12-04 10:08 PM by blm
Because Bush is GOOD for their business. He is PART of it. His thugs were all part of the initial funding of their groups through BCCI and other covert dealings of the 70s and 80s. They have a symbiotic relationship.

Kerry is the one who tried exposing them and their govenment benefactors. Kerry has vowed to start naming names if governments in those nations supporting terror groups don't shut off the funding and open their banking books to anti-terror efforts. He will give them 100 days from taking office and then he lowers the boom on all who do not comply.

Kerry knows damn well who's who from his extensive investigations of BCCI and IranContra and the classified papers he saw that were unable to be released to the public record. Kerry predicted the growth of global terror in his 1997 book, The New War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-04 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I posted something similarly a few days ago...
of course Al-Queda wants Crusader-boy in office for four more years, they can count on him to react exactly as they want him to and totally screw up the "war on terra". I wish some of the Dems would pick up on this too and start making some stark contrasts between the the two halves of the campaign against Al-Queda, before the neocons began shrieking for war against Iraq (Multinational and multilateral and rather successful) and the era after (Unilateralist, except for the "coalition of the coerced", which has been somewhat less successful) and point up how we now receive less cooperation than before, and how that makes us much less safe. I mean, the Iranians cancelled "death to America day" and sent us condolences after September 11th. The Syrians arrested and gave us an important Al-Queda operative. Heard anything like that lately?
Kerry has made a few general statements about his approach to fighting terror but his campaign needs to focus more directly on this (this is after all the linchpin of shrubbie's campaign) and come up with some specific ways in which his approach will differ from shrubbies and how it would make us safer than the approach the regime has taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC