HEADLINE: Bush Lite: What's With the President's Re-election Campaign?
BYLINE: By Stuart Rothenberg
OK, so where are they? And why can't we find them? I'm not talking about those weapons of mass destruction. Or even the jobs that were supposed to be created by the economic recovery. No, I'm talking about those nasty, vicious, unfair assaults from what Democrats refer to as the Republican attack machine.
Democratic Party lore holds that the Republicans fight dirtier than they do. The evidence most often cited includes the so-called Willie Horton ad from 1988, Saxby Chambliss' TV ad attacking then-Sen. Max Cleland (D) in the 2002 Georgia Senate race, and attacks by Bush allies on Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) in the 2000 GOP presidential race, particularly leading up to the South Carolina primary contest.
Regardless of whether you agree that one party tends to be nastier than the other in its attacks (and I don't), this year's Bush campaign has been anything but aggressive or quick to counterpunch.
<snip>
While Kerry and his allies never miss an opportunity to skewer the president or Vice President Cheney, the GOP rapid-response team seems less than rapid and not particularly responsive.
<snip>
http://www.rollcall.com/pub/49_92/rothenberg/4732-1.html(password needed)
The rest of the article goes onto say how the Kerry Campaign has been incredibly aggressive post Super Tuesday, hitting Bush on all levels - domestically and foreign policy, including controversial issues like Bush AWOL. The Bush team has been rather lax in their rapid-response. Conventional wisdom is learn from your mistakes, and in this case the Democrats are tired of the Gore/Dukakis ass kicking we recieved so we're fighting back and fighthing back hard.
Lets go get those Bush Bastards!