Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Is Your Least Favorite President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:22 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who Is Your Least Favorite President
Finally, a DU Poll Bush can win....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush makes me long for Nixon......
These guys accomplish the equivalent of Watergate on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bush Almost Makes Me Long For Jefferson Davis....
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. Bush makes me wish Jefferson Davis had been successful
We would have never had to put up with Junior. Or his Daddy. Or DeLay. Or Lott. Or Jesse Helms. Or Zell Miller. Or Strom Thurmond. Or Jebbie. Or the Southern Baptists. Or the KKK.

And just in case anybody thinks I'm South bashing, I would have instituted a liberal immigration policy for cool people from Dixie B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Andrew Jackson

Is this who you meant by Andrew Johnson? Why would anyone dislike Andrew Johnson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That was tough!
Because I can't stand Reagan either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. apparently some in congress at the time
I guess. But hey, Clinton was impeached and not convicted either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Because He Thwarted Reconstruction....
That's why he was impeached....

Of course the Radical Republicans didn't say that's why they wanted to impeach him...

Funny, the Republicans were the good guys back then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes and no
I'd probably have been a Republican, but Republicans and Democrats both represented both good interests and very bad interests. Republicans were, remember, also the party of religious fanatics and large business interests, and Democrats were the party of poor, Northern workers and immigrants. The parties were large coalitions with some meritorious parts and some embarassing parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. But The Rs Of That Day Were Tireless Advocates Of The Freedman...
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Of course, having the Radical Republicans in charge of Reconstruction
Edited on Tue Mar-16-04 06:01 PM by Art_from_Ark
in the South would be like having the Neocons in charge of "reconstruction" in Iraq.

The "good" in the Republican Party died with Lincoln, was resurrected with the Progressive movement, and has been locked in a cage for most of the time since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. But The Radical Republicans Were On The Right Side Of History
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. In some ways, yes, in some ways, no
Edited on Tue Mar-16-04 06:12 PM by Art_from_Ark
The RR's were involved in the scandals in the Grant misadministration, they stole the election from Samuel Tilden in 1876, they were the robber barons during the Gilded Age, and they very well may have been responsible for Lincoln's death. A cynic would say that the only reasons they supported the freedmen were to shore up their base in the South and to keep them out of the North.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Hmm... could go either way
Andrew Johnson was weak, though because congress was dominated by radical republicans that's not necessarily his fault. But his presidency didn't accomplish much. On the other hand, he at least remained with the union, I believe he could have gone with the Confederates.

But yeah, Andrew Jackson initiated the trail of tears, I believe, and for that he should be included in this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Because Andrew Johnson was a terrible President
a lot worse as President than Andrew Jackson. Not worse, however, than George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Why?

Because he refused to punish the South following the Civil War?

And Andrew Jackson was a lot worse. People seem to think of the Trail of Tears as just another incident of brutality against the Native American population. Had he arranged for the greatest of comfort in their trip and relocated them to a land flowing in milk and honey, it was still a horrendously stupid action that cost the United States dearly in future dealings with Native American nations further west.

The Cherokee had a written constitution. They had public education. They had churches, plantations, and factories. They applied for statehood. Congress approved. The Supreme Court approved. But Jackson said "no" and, relying upon his popularity with the military, threatened to rip up the US Constitution should Congress and the Court intervene.

Instead of the State of Cherokee paving the way for Native American assimilation into the United States of America, the Trail of Tears stood as an example that no amount of assimilation would be acceptable.

And this was the fault of one man: Andrew Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. John Marshall's Court did intervene
And Jackson replied, "John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."

If Jackson were alive today, he'd fit right in with the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Not at all true
Because Jackson expanded the right to vote to millions of people who had been previously disenfranchised. Before Jackson, this nation was essentially an oligarchy. Only rich, landed men (white, of course) were allowed to vote. Jackson was really instrumental in pushing through universal sufferage. No, it didn't cover women, Native Americans or slaves, but it the stage for the later efforts to do just that. Every citizen could vote - that is really the signature of a democracy, and something then without precedent. He fought to weaken the power of corporations and banks, helping the poor and the middle classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Jackson's reckless monetary policies led to the Panic of 1837
Edited on Tue Mar-16-04 08:48 PM by Art_from_Ark
Jackson encouraged "wildcat banks" to set up shop out in the boonies, where they took depositers' silver and gold and issued paper money that wasn't worth its face value outside of the town it was issued in-- and even in the town it was issued in, it was often used at a discount to real gold and silver, because no one one could be certain when the bank might close up shop and move out. Then Jackson had the nerve to ask for payment of debts to the government in specie (gold and silver), which many people could not do because they had been swindled by the wildcat banks. The one bank that people could trust, the Bank of the United States, had its charter revoked (indirectly, it was allowed to lapse) by Jackson. The next year, when Jackson was safely out of office, the Panic of 1837 struck, resulting in a severe economic depression that would last throughout his hapless successor's term.

As for opening up the vote to the "disenfranchised", he mostly targeted the rednecks who wanted to open up more Indian land to settlement. He never would have been in favor of giving the right to vote to non-whites and females.

Jackson was also notorious for starting the spoils system, in which he doled out government jobs to cronies who were otherwise unqualified for their positions.

And don't get me started on Jackson's genocidal policies.

In short, if Jackson were alive today, he would be a neocon hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. Jackson isn't responsible for the Trail of Tears
The Trail of Tears occurred during Van Buren's Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. It was set in place by Jackson
He had already been forcibly removing Cherokees from their lands at the time that John Marshall's Supreme Court, in 1831, ruled in favor of the Cherokees. But Jackson flagrantly ignored the ruling and did everything he could to make life miserable for the Cherokees. As someone who has worked alongside Cherokees, I know that they have a special dislike for this bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redsoxliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. he slaughtered indians. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalBushFan Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Al Gore
by far the worst. Instead of doing his job he let some inbecile sit in his office and give all the orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redsoxliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
39. HAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA
by far the worst. Instead of doing his job he let some inbecile sit in his office and give all the orders.




LOLOLOLOLOL classic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
methinks2 Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. bush of course but
Jackson was a murderous man. He would get my second vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The BUSHES
BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bush sucks, but Nixon and his crooks were evil
This must be a young crowd. Vietnam, Xmas bombings, Kent State, Weatherman, slush funds, Watergate. And I'm just getting started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. "Nixon sucks, but Bush and his crooks were evil"
This must be a young crowd, Iraq, The Patriot Act, The Anti-Gay Maqrriage Amendment, sweetheart contracts to Haliburton, the outing of CIA agents. And I'm just getting started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I'll see your Patriot act and raise you a Watergate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Watergate was child's play compared to the current gang of crooks
Nixon, as bad as he was, did not have anywhere near the power that the current cabal do.

Nixon-- Democratic Congress, relatively unfettered press, progressive Supreme Court
bu$h-- Reactionary congress, corporate whore press, neocon Supreme Court

I remember Watergate very well. Every night, the news would be about Pentagon Papers and Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist. Later, my US Government teacher brought a TV to class so we could watch Sam Ervin, John Dean, and the Watergate proceedings live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Actually, it's pretty much the same gang of crooks.
The Bush Criminal Empire has been the "men behind the curtain" of every Republican presidency since Eisenhower. Ike figured out their bullshit and wouldn't play along. Some reports even suggest that Nixon was resisting and that Watergate was created so they could dump him. That's why numbskulls Ford and Reagan (and Junior for that matter) were perfect frontmen for the regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. That pretty much explains why the Repugs prefer numbskulls for candidates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. What? No mexican du-ers?
I agree with Bush-2 first, Bush-1 second, Raygun third, and then Polk fourth

Polk was the 18th century version of Bush - the last of Andrew Jackson's proteges, and just as dedicated to expansionism. This man took half of another sovereign nation and added it to the US. And we wonder why Mexico struggles with poverty. They actually occupied Mexico City for a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. GWB runs away with it. I never knew I could despise a leader...
... more than I despised his father.

I shock myself, sometimes. Thanks, GW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zell Millerish Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Conservative Democrats should be in there as well
Given the progressive leanings of the party, shouldn't more conservative Democrats be in there as well? LBJ would get some votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Hehe coincidentally your name is Zell Millerish...
Welcome to DU :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zell Millerish Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Similarities to Miller
Just like Zell Miller, I am a Republican cloaked as a Democrat!;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Welcome, Zell - i hope we can turn you to the Dark - err Democratic - Side
and, no, LBJ screwed up big time with his fight against the commies, but largely redeems himself in history with the civil rights changes and the war on poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zell Millerish Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Dark - err Democratic - Side
Truth be told, I was sent here by the RNC to put you people on "Double Secret Probation"! You see you can tell I am Republicans by my use of expression "you people". Only an elitist, poor people hating, rights trampling Republican would use such an insensitive expression to address such astute noble (if misguided)people like Democrats!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Hmmm, you certainly show all the symptoms of RNC
membership, including the linguistic deficiencies. Stick around, we'll teach you some good marxist populist rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dubya by far...
Bush I didn't do nearly as much damage as his son has done. And Ronnie Raygun, although no prize himself, is better than the neocon clones that he spawned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. They just keep getting worse, don't they?
I shudder to think what repug might follow in Dubyuh's footsteps! :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clyyyde Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. Get ready
It's going to be Rudy, mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Either Reagan or Woodrow Wilson
IMHO, Wilson can NEVER be forgiven for inventing the modern propaganda and war machine that has run the US for almost 100 years.

Without his efforts to turn a relatively peaceful, docile nation into a bunch of raving warmongers just so a few American corporations could be war profiteers this world would not be nearly as screwed up as it is today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. Any repug president looks good
compared to chimpy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC