There's a post up right now claiming Obama has a "PRO-WAR RECORD" in the Senate:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4643795&mesg_id=4643795To make that claim, it cuts and pastes from a poorly-researched and misleading article from Paul Street of Zmag.org. It lists a bunch of funding and confirmation votes which supposedly show Obama to be "pro-war". The problem is that, by their definition, every single Senator has a "PRO-WAR RECORD".
You see, I went through the roll calls for all those funding votes and it turns out that they all (and I do mean ALL) passed unanimously among Democrats.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00109http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00254http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00326http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00366http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00112http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00171http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00261http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00117http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00126So unless you're ready to call the likes of Feingold, Boxer, and every other Senator who voted against the IWR "pro-war", you're barking up the wrong tree. The bottom line is that these Senators opposed the war from the beginning, but saw the need to support funding (until recently, when many like Obama changed course).
I'm really perplexed as to how a confirmation vote could be seen as a referendum on the war, especially when so many of those votes were also passed unanimously. Even those that had opposition were generally split among anti-war Senators. Obama has always had the position that Presidents should be able to pick who they want to work for them (this obviously doesn't apply to judicial nominees). When he's President, he wants to be able to pick the best people and not have them rejected because they're too liberal.
Has Obama's record been perfect since entering the Senate? No. He's made a number of mistakes in my opinion, including being a little late to wake up to the fact that our presence in Iraq was making things worse and we had no choice but to defund and set a date certain in order to withdraw. And maybe if he was running against Russ Feingold, there'd be a legitimate argument here.
But for Hillary Clinton supporters to be attacking Obama on this score makes me angry when I know that their candidate voted for the Iraq War resolution and has never apologized or even admitted she made a mistake on that vote. And especially when she has the same supposedly "PRO-WAR" record once the war started.