Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Truth About Barack Obama's Iraq War Record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:01 AM
Original message
The Truth About Barack Obama's Iraq War Record
There's a post up right now claiming Obama has a "PRO-WAR RECORD" in the Senate:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4643795&mesg_id=4643795

To make that claim, it cuts and pastes from a poorly-researched and misleading article from Paul Street of Zmag.org. It lists a bunch of funding and confirmation votes which supposedly show Obama to be "pro-war". The problem is that, by their definition, every single Senator has a "PRO-WAR RECORD".

You see, I went through the roll calls for all those funding votes and it turns out that they all (and I do mean ALL) passed unanimously among Democrats.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00109
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00254
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00326
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00366
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00112
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00171
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00261
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00117
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00126

So unless you're ready to call the likes of Feingold, Boxer, and every other Senator who voted against the IWR "pro-war", you're barking up the wrong tree. The bottom line is that these Senators opposed the war from the beginning, but saw the need to support funding (until recently, when many like Obama changed course).

I'm really perplexed as to how a confirmation vote could be seen as a referendum on the war, especially when so many of those votes were also passed unanimously. Even those that had opposition were generally split among anti-war Senators. Obama has always had the position that Presidents should be able to pick who they want to work for them (this obviously doesn't apply to judicial nominees). When he's President, he wants to be able to pick the best people and not have them rejected because they're too liberal.

Has Obama's record been perfect since entering the Senate? No. He's made a number of mistakes in my opinion, including being a little late to wake up to the fact that our presence in Iraq was making things worse and we had no choice but to defund and set a date certain in order to withdraw. And maybe if he was running against Russ Feingold, there'd be a legitimate argument here.

But for Hillary Clinton supporters to be attacking Obama on this score makes me angry when I know that their candidate voted for the Iraq War resolution and has never apologized or even admitted she made a mistake on that vote. And especially when she has the same supposedly "PRO-WAR" record once the war started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ossman Donating Member (883 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. An attack from Hillbots or Repugs?
Its getting hard to tell them apart. They play in the same sandbox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended on principle
Thanks for sharing the fucking context. Now you know how we Edwardians felt when you Obamites ripped Edwards for a year without giving any context to the five bills that were flyspecked out of the thousands he cast...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Umm... wasn't he wrong from day one on Iraq.
I will credit him for changing his mind and for his apology. It should have come down to Edwards and Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. THE PATRIOT ACT PASSED 98-1
98-1!!!!!! Not ONE Obamite had the damn integrity to ever post the fucking vote total. Edwardians should never forget this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why are you bringing up the Patriot Act?
I was referring to the IWR which passed 296 to 133. Edwards unlike Hillary has expressed regret, apologized and explained why he's changed his mind since voting Yes to the war resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Post 2. It was one of the chosen 5
That and the No Child Left Behind (91-8 overall, 47-2 among Democrats including Wellstone, Kennedy, Boxer, Leahy, and new saint Kerry) wee the most obvious examples of what Obama would later decry in the South Carolina debate. Obamites never gave the vote totals for those bills because that would ruin their attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. BAM!!!!! Point made, and point TAKEN! You're quite right! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC