|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
cloud75 (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:42 PM Original message |
MSNBC is out of control. They are still going with the story about Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. I know - and they also don't understand why Michelle's remarks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. MSNBC, KO, Tweety, Whora O'Donnell, Ms. Greenspan and company |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. I watched two hours of Hillary Hate yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
islandmkl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. in general, DENIAL has no inherent relevance to TRUTH... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. You answered your question: It sure sounds like they have an agenda no matter the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Araxen (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. a total of 5 people in the country watch msnbc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. MSNBC= More Shit NoBody Cares about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. Just because they denied it doesn't mean there's no story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloud75 (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Was it a Clinton source a Nobama source...hmmm very Rovarian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. The article said it was a Clinton source, but perhaps not a well-connected one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. Or perhaps somebody who was recently unceremoniously dumped from the campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. sucks don't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. 55% does not "despise" her at all. One national survey shows 25% of Rep women would vote for her.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. and how many Democratic/Independent men wouldn't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Hey shillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Deleted message |
stranger_with_candy (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well if she denied it then it certainly can't be true!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ericgtr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
10. Because her campaign said that's what they were going to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. Huh? I thought you Clinton supporters knew already... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. Turn that crap off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. They have nothing else to talk about and need you to stay tuned for 2 more hours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
20. MSNBC is nothing more than Fox News Lite, maybe even worse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
22. Clearly an Obama attack on the HRC campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
24. Just because the categorically deny it does not mean it's not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Politico is a RW rag....nuff said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
26. That sucks, and I hope you expressed equal outrage yesterday when they ran with the Obama story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-19-08 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
28. If I finally have my timelines straight, the story came out.. then a couple of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC