Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wanna read my letter to the editor? (Bush soft on terror)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 09:04 PM
Original message
Wanna read my letter to the editor? (Bush soft on terror)
Last week, I wrote one comparing Martha Stewart's mini-crime to Bush's Harken stock mega-crime and they published it.

This week? Bush is soft on terror. I hope they publish it! I'm going to use a different name and town from last week. I want to try and do this once a week. I figure this is one thing that I can do to try and help get the truth out.

--------------
BUSH IS SOFT ON TERROR

George Bush is trying to focus on his image of a strong leader and protector, but the truth is that he is soft on defense. He has not properly defended this country and he obviously does not understand what needs to be done.

He ignored pleas to focus on Al Queda from the outgoing administration until 9/11 happened. Then, after delivering a few blows to Al Queda and the Taliban, all of a sudden he changed priorities. Instead of continuing the search for Osama (who had attacked the US), he decided to go after Saddam (who hadn’t). He put the majority of our resources and troops in Iraq instead of continuing on the path to dismantling Al Queda.

Bush promised us that he would protect us, that he would dismantle Al Queda, that he would get Osama dead or alive. Instead, 2.5 years later, the Taliban once again control almost 1/3 of Afghanistan and Al Queda is at full-strength, carrying out a large attack on Spain and planning another attack on US soil. And what did Saddam have? Nothing. If Bush had not switched the majority of our resources to Iraq, Al Queda may be a memory by now. Not to mention how Bush constantly protects Saudi Arabia—the country where 15 of the 9/11 hijackers were from.

We are no safer now than we were the morning of 9/11. Al Queda has the strength to repeat 9/11 at any moment now. Bush has let us down. He does not know how to handle the most basic elements of defense: identify the enemy and bring them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EdGy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. This letter is very good...
This is the kind of letter and message that should be flooding every newspaper and broadcast outlet throughout the USA.

MoveOn and Kerry should be running ads that dramatize these points.

Bush is weak on terrorism. His policies have been a disaster.

And the proof is right out in the open, not at all hard to find, and very straightforward.

Thanks for this letter, Killarney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmaier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. That letter is too good not to share broadly
Very, very nice job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent letter! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is wonderful.
Can I copy it and send it to the Star Telegram in Ft. Worth under my name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sure! Anyone that wants to
can copy this and send it to their papers under their names. It's ok with me.

The more people that read stuff like this in their papers every week, the better IMO. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I should probably say that I'm sending it to the Boston Globe
(just so no one else sends the same letter to the Boston Globe under another name). :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Change the letter to be YOUR personal letter...
It's a great letter(thnks for writing it), but we don't want to SPAM the ltte pages.

All we need is for some visiting paid infiltrator on this site to point out that ltte's in 20 towns are EXACTLY the same.

Surely each of can add our own personal touch...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC