How many antiKerry smear sites are up and running already?

[blm]

Maybe we should make a list so we are all aware of WHO and what we are up against the next 7 months.

[Melodybe]

1. Kerry only has a tenth of the anti sites that shrub has.

The best thing about looking at anti-Kerry aka freeper sites is that the graphics and format sux. Freepers always have these really stupid sites, all of the photoshops are done badly. Looking at their sites proves to me that all of the smart folks are in our camp.


HA HA HA FREEPERS SITES SUCK!

[KittyWampus]

2. Honestly, I Think Leftists Tend To Be More Creative

and maybe, since we are a bit more likely to be artistically creative, we have less of a need to use violence as an outlet.

[DuctapeFatwa]

3. The War on Terror must be expanded to fight evilcoders who hate Kerry

If you can find enough, you could make a deck of cards!

[blm]

4. Well, I know according to YOU Kerry belongs in a deck of cards with Bush.

YOU tell everyone that Kerry is just a better spoken version of Bush.

YOU tell gullible people that Kerry is the same as Bush but he uses prettier words.

YOU either have a perception problem or you are working to suppress voter turnout on the left.

[DuctapeFatwa]

5. The Kerry assets you mention seem to be doing pretty well for him

Kerry doesn't need the votes of the "left."

His positions on the issues will do more to "suppress" the handful of voters who oppose current US policy regardless of who articulates it, and after the election there will be plenty of time to get those dangerous folks into progressive pre-emptive custody.

[Name removed]

6. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[blm]

7. BTW...You hijacked a thread again. Why not make your own antiKerry smear

site and stop pretending you care about the concerns of the left?

[Dookus]

8. they already made one

but new rules forbid me from mentioning it.

[HalfManHalfBiscuit]

10. There are some new rules about other websites?

Could you point me to them, I must have missed them.

Thanks.

[edzontar]

31. See my post in ATA on this.

nt,

[edzontar]

30. The only so-called "Anti-Kerry" site you are NOT allowed to mention

Is NOT an anti-Kerry site at all.

[blm]

13. You are misstating my post again. YOUR perceptions

were listed and the point made that your perceptions are meant to mislead people into believing that Kerry and Bush are the same, thereby devaluing their vote.

[DuctapeFatwa]

14. I don't think bush needs your help to smear Kerry with these false charges

of opposing US policies. He has 200 million dollars to hire pros. Do you think you are more skilled than they?

[blm]

18. STOP saying Bush and Kerry are the same, DF. You are NOT telling the truth

.

[DuctapeFatwa]

20. There are some very visible cosmetic and stylistic differences

If there were substantive differences in policy, it is unlikely that he would have garnered either the delegates or the contributions that he has.

If you doubt that, try reviewing the Super Tuesday results of candidates who advocated even slight deviations from the status quo.

[AntiCoup2K4]

17. And YOU tell everybody that global fascism is perfectly acceptable

...as long as it's in a bright shiny new wrapper called "PPI"

[blm]

19. And YOU have no idea what Kerry's policies are.

Instead you rely on what you heard about ONE advisor while completely IGNORING Kerry's own lengthy record of policy positions that rely on his own progressive mindset.

And yet you give undying support for someone who was FOR EVERY war the last 30 years, including the illegal Reagan and Bush wars in Central America, all the while you dump on one of the most progressive foreign policy minds of the last thirty years. Can't you see how that sanctimony wears thin?

[IndianaGreen]

23. Will a President Kerry follow Spain's example and pull out of Iraq?

Or will Kerry keep US troops in Iraq for as many years as it takes to keep an American puppet regime in power, as we did in South Vietnam?

An occupation is an occupation no matter which flag the occupier flies.

[RichM]

9. This is a good point. I hadn't realized the seriousness of this threat.

The Kerry-hating evilcoders - they're everywhere!

Send 'em to Gitmo!

[Hav]

11. That's what you call a good point?

That thread wasn't about "banning" or forbidding "anti-Kerry" sites. So the point of the poster, who often enough "joked" about Kerry extending the Patriot Act or the war on terror to include those who "dissent", is invalid and unfunny.

The original poster stated:

"Maybe we should make a list so we are all aware of WHO and what we are up against the next 7 months."

It was just about informing about what's going on.
Nowhere do I read something that justifies your comment of "Send 'em to Gitmo! ".
Maybe you should have paid more intention to the whole thread instead to the old slogan of the poster you replied to.
You might also realise soon that this very slogan belongs to his standard responses that he used in severak threads already.
In my opinion, he should at least try to choose a phrase that somehow remotely fits into the thread. Unfortunately, that's not the case here.

[RichM]

15. 2 comments. First, the post I was responding to was funny. It was

very, very funny. That's why I responded to it. I was trying to make a little joke - though I realize it wasn't nearly as funny as the post I was responding to.

Second, everything else you said is a confused pile of horse manure. I don't know what your problem is, & I don't care.

[Hav]

26. .

Well, I'm not surprised that it is confusing for you. You didn't understand most posts in that thread otherwise you would have known what the topic is.
Further, you didn't say you found the post funny. You said he had a good point. For the case you didn't know, there is a difference between a funny post and a post with a good point.
Seems that if you don't even know what you were writing yourself, it is very understandable that you have a hard time to understand the posts of other people.

[hippiegranny]

12. probably DOZENS

and sometimes du is one of them. many people here still want to whine about kerry and try to trash him. i ask, to what end? they WANT bush to win?

[sandnsea]

16. Still more anti-Kerry DU posts

Even in this thread I see. I don't know what the point of it all is. Were some of these people ever for any Democrat at any point in time???? :crazy:

[Dark Angel]

21. Those who seek to tear down Kerry,

can not, in my opinion, say that they are looking out for the best interests of the Democratic Party's base constituencies: that would be labor unions, teachers, middle and working class people, veterans, and the list goes on. If you do not vote for Kerry, then you are saying that it does not matter what happens to these constituencies. That is my opinion.

[edzontar]

32. BAN them!!!!! Purge them!!!!! Will no one deliver you?

nt.

[RetroLounge]

22. I hold in my hand a list....

have you no decency sir, at long last?

:eyes:

RL

[blm]

29. Have you ever bothered to notice...

that some of us are serious when we post and have not participated in the silly competitive forum battles?

I care about the faux veteran sites that are being promoted as real veteran sites and the faux outraged catholics, et al. Obvious GOP operatives, imo.

I was hoping we could make a real list here but it seems the vanity of some posters always rears its ugly head.

[Name removed]

24. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

25. SInce you already know we are requested not to post about

nor attack that site per your post in ATA...why did you just register and do it twice?

[radfringe]

27. hits on google

Google:

key word:
anti-Kerry approx 20,200 hits
anti-Bush approx 404,000 hits

anti-democrat approx 11,300 hits
anti-republican approx 10,700 hits

[blm]

28. Thanks for those who took the post seriously and raspeberries to those

who injected their own vanity into the thread.